Case law

Driggers v. United States

1 Okla. Crim. 167 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 1908

W. 294 ; Lee v. State, 44 Tex. Cr. R. 460 , 72 S. W. 195; State v. Exum, 138 N. C. 599 , 50 S. E. 283 ; State v. Grant, 79 Mo. 113 , 49 Am. Rep. 218 ; Hicks v. State, 165 Ind. 440 , 75 N. E. 641 . … North Carolina: Wallace v. Grizzard, 114 N. C. 488 , 19 S. E. 760 . Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. Brown, 23. Pa. Super Ct. 470; Crooks v. Bunn, 136 Pa. 368 , 20 Atl. 529 . South Carolina: State v. McDaniel, 68 S.

POSEY v. STATE

548 P.3d 1245 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 2024

Uttecht v. Brown , 551 U.S. 1, 9 (2007); see also Eizember v. … Brown v. Sanders , 546 U.S. 212, 220 (2006) (footnote omitted).

Stouffer v. State

738 P.2d 1349 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 18, 1987

Filgueras v. State, 668 P.2d 1172 (Okl.Cr.1983); T.R.M. v. State, 596 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1979); and, Lemmon v. State, 538 P.2d 596, 601 (Okl.Cr.1975). … Brown v. State, 650 P.2d 50 (Okl.Cr.1982). Prior to the complained comments that were made in the first stage, defense counsel had ridiculed the State's evidence as being embarrassingly slim.

Rhamy v. State

307 P.2d 555 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1957

See among cases where applied: Louis v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 156 , 222 P.2d 160 ; Woolridge v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 326 , 263 P.2d 196 ; DeArmond v. State, Okl.Cr., 285 P.2d 236 . … The Pardon and Parole Board is under no such inhibition where the prisoner brings himself within its regulations, and in its judgment the facts would justify relief.

Bias v. State

561 P.2d 523 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1977

See, Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 456 P.2d 604 (1969). In light of the fact that it was defendant’s motion for severance filed the day before trial that was sustained, we find this assignment of error without merit. … In Carr v.

Rowbotham v. State

542 P.2d 610 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1975

In Miranda v. … In Pate v.

Diaz v. State

728 P.2d 503 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1986

On February 1,1982, appellant boarded a plane in Tucson, Arizona, and flew to Oklahoma City to meet with Dr. Harold Wurst. Appellant was having financial problems and Dr. … See Cloman v. State, 574 P.2d 410, 420-21 (Wyo.1978); Grigsby v. State, 260 Ark. 499 , 542 S.W.2d 275, 280-81 (1976); State v.

Slaughter v. State

69 O.B.A.J. 87 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1997

See Yates v. … Davenport v.

LOCKETT v. STATE

2014 OK CR 3 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 2014

set execution dates in January 2014 for Lockett and Warner after both death row inmates had exhausted their state and federal appeals. 1 Both sought and were denied executive clemency from the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board … Duvall v.

Fanning v. State

27 Okla. Crim. 27 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1923

And the case of Turnbull v. … The question of trespass *40 was not involved, as in the following eases cited by defendant: Dickinson v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 151 , 104 Pac. 923 ; Collegenia v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 425 , 132 Pac. 375 ; Armstrong v.

Grasso v. State

64 O.B.A.J. 2360 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1993

The factors that persuade me are the consistent, across-the-board opinion that Grasso is competent, Grasso’s statements to the lower court and this Court, and Dr. … See Godinez v.

Klettke v. State

92 Okla. Crim. 366 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1950

In State v. … In Knight v.

Lowe v. State

541 P.2d 244 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1975

In Rambo v. … Also, Janeway v.

Taylor v. State

889 P.2d 319 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1995

Brown, 470 N.W.2d 30, 32 (Iowa 1991) (holding that trial court’s admissibility decision regarding expert testimony will be reversed only if discretion abused and defendant suffered prejudice). … Brown v. State, 751 P.2d 1078, 1079 (Okl.Cr. 1988). . There was no such prejudicial testimony in this case. . According to Arthur J.

Barnett v. State

263 P.3d 959 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 2011

Simpson v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 , 53 LEd.2d 187 (1977); Perry v.

McCracken v. State

65 O.B.A.J. 3381 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1994

In Farmer v. … See Salazar v. State, 852 P.2d 729 (Okl.Cr.1993); Pickens v. State, 850 P.2d 328 (Okl.Cr.1993); Fox v. State, 779 P.2d 562 (Okl.Cr.1989); Stafford v. State, 669 P.2d 285 (Okl.Cr.1983).

Holt v. State

84 Okla. Crim. 283 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1947

Jenkins v. State, 80 Okla. Cr. 328 , 161 P. 2d 90 ; State v. Frisbee, 8 Okla. Cr. 406 , 127 P. 1091 ; Pollock v. State, 26 Okla. Cr. 196 , 223 P. 210 ; Conley v. State, 34 Okla. … In Tobin v. State, 49 Okla.

COLE v. TRAMMELL

358 P.3d 932 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 2015

Cole v. … See Woolen, 1984 OK CR 58 , T6, 676 P.2d at 1876-77 ("Mandamus is a command from a court of law of competent jurisdiction ... to some inferior court, tribunal, or board, or corporation or person, requiring the performance

Washington v. State

989 P.2d 960 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 7, 1999

Appellant relies on Cheney v. State, 1995 OK CR 72 , 909 P.2d 74 and Brown v. … See also Brown v.

Hooks v. State

126 P.3d 636 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 2005

Hooks v. State, 1993 OK CR 41 , 862 P.2d 1273 , cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 1870 , 128 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994). . Hooks v. … Myers v. State, 2005 OK CR 22, ¶ 6, 7 , 130 P.3d 262 . . The proceedings followed our instructions in Lambert v.