Case law

Orme v. State

63 Okla. Crim. 325 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 14, 1938

In Tillery v. State, 23 Okla. … Choate v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 314 , 258 Pac. 360 ; Clemmer v. State, 56 Okla. Cr. 354 ; 40 Pac. 2d 37 ; Fred Houston v. State, 63 Okla. Cr. 49 , 72 Pac. 2d 526 ; A. G. Goodnight v. State, 62 Okla.

Davis v. State

280 P.2d 749 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1955

Under the provisions of Tit. 37 O.S.1951 § 88, it is provided: “No warrant shall be issued to search a private residence, occupied as such, unless it, or some part of it, is used as a store, shop, hotel, boarding house, or … Relf v. State, 35 Okl.Cr. 234 , 250 P. 141 ; Duncan v. State, 11 Okl.Cr. 217 , 144 P. 629 ; Blackwell v. State, 54 Okl.Cr. 401 , 22 P.2d 1041 ; Watson v. State, 73 Okl.Cr. 58 , 117 P.2d 808 ; Buckley v.

Stewart v. State

757 P.2d 388 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 25, 1988

Deputy Court Clerk Ramona Browning identified State Exhibits Nos. 6-8, as copies of a petition, ex parte emergency order, and final protective order, which were filed respectively on March 7, 8 and 14, 1985, listing Jesse … Under Wainwright v.

Ex Parte Justus

3 Okla. Crim. 111 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1909

Elliott v. Peirsol, 1 Pet. 328 , 7 L. Ed. 164 . … Tweed v. Lipscomb, 60 N Y. 559, 19 Am. Rep. 211 .”

Igo v. State

267 P.2d 1082 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1954

Riddle v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 397 , 223 P.2d 379 ; Smith v. State, 55 Okl. Cr. 214, 28 P.2d 587 ; Jones v. State, 20 Okl. Cr. 233, 202 P. 187 ; Neill v. State, 89 Okl. Cr. 272, 207 P.2d 344 ; Woolridge v. … He-stated that, the defendant h^d on,. a red shirt and brown pants. He was. asked: “Q. Did you recognize Pearl Igo,?. A. I couldn’t exactly recognize her.

Grant v. McLeod

325 P.2d 1083 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 14, 1958

Dawson v. … Collins v. State, 24 Okl.Cr. 117 , 217 P. 896 ; White v. State, 45 Okl.Cr. 289 , 283 P. 581 ; Ex parte Coley, 67 Okl.Cr. 482 , 94 P.2d 968 ; Willard v.

Akins v. State

91 Okla. Crim. 47 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1950

He was assured his board would not cost him anything. Thereafter the argument about the gambling started over again. … In Lee v. State, 67 Okla.

KETCHUM v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA

2026 OK CR 17 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 2026

OSCN Found Document:KETCHUM v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA KETCHUM v. … Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). See Calvert v. State , 2022 OK CR 19 517 P.3d 977 Pullen v. State , 2016 OK CR 18 387 P.3d 922 McDaniel v. Brown , 558 U.S. 120, 131 (2010); Young v.

Burns v. State

8 Okla. Crim. 554 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1913

State v. Bilansky, 3 Minn. 246 ( Gil. 169 ); State v. Ryan, 13 Minn. 370 ( Gil. 343 ).’ … See, also, Brown v. State, 13 Ark. 100 .” The same doctrine was announced in the case of Folden v. State, 13 Neb. 332 , 14 N.

Tubby v. State

15 Okla. Crim. 496 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 20, 1919

Crittenden v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 351 , 164 Pac. 675 , and cases cited in the body of that opinion. … Cheadle v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 566 , 149 Pac. 919 , L. R. A. 1915E, 1031.

Walters v. State

455 P.2d 702 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 21, 1969

Defendant’s contention (d) falls within the rule enunciated in Wallace v. … In Robison v.

RUNNELS v. STATE

2018 OK CR 27 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 9, 2018

The fact that the Pardon and Parole Board has arbitrarily set forty-five (45) years as the number the Board will use to comply with the "Forgotten Man Act", 57 O.S.Supp.2013 § 332.7, does not affect the actual sentence; that … Hogan v.

Cavett v. Territory

1 Okla. Crim. 493 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1908

C. 265, 266; United States v. Hill, 1 Brock. 156 , Fed. Cas. No. 15,364; Mackey v. People, 2 Colo. 13 ; Stone v. People, 2 Scam. (Ill.) 326; Straughan v. State, 16 Ark. 36-43; Wilburn v. … State, 21 Ark. 198, 201 ; Gibson v. Com., 2 Va. Cases, 111-121; Shaffer v. State, 1 How. (Miss.) 238; Woodsides v. State, 2 How. (Miss.) 655; State v. Harris (Supreme Court of Iowa September, 1884) 17 Chi. Leg. N. 58.

Ridgeway v. State

25 Okla. Crim. 41 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1923

Jones v. State, 20 Okla. Cr. 233 , 202 Pac. 187 ; Harrison v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 14 , 141 Pac. 236 . … J. 1363; Dobbins v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 403 , 208 Pac. 1056 ; Williams v. State, 19 Okla.

Jackson v. State

73 O.B.A.J. 9 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2001

Hale v. State, 1988 OK CR 24 , ¶ 48, 750 P.2d 130, 142 . … Trice v. State, 1993 OK CR 19, ¶ 24 , 853 P.2d 203, 212 .

Lambert v. State

984 P.2d 221 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1999

See Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 , 5 U.S. 137 , 2 L.Ed. 60 . . Thompson v. … See, e.g., Hadley v. Alabama, 575 So.2d 145 (Ala.Crim.App.1990); Arizona v. Jimenez, 165 *243 Ariz. 444 , 799 P.2d 785 (1990); Brown v.

ZOU v. STATE

2026 OK CR 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 2026

OSCN Found Document:ZOU v. STATE ZOU v. … Bosse v.

Tuggle v. State

73 Okla. Crim. 208 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1941

Hardy v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 75 , 248 P. 846 ; Spelling v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 195 , 28 P. 2d 584 ; Hancock v. State, 57 Okla. Cr. 329 , 48 P. 2d 348 ; McDessey v. State, 61 Okla. Cr. 345 , 68 P. 2d 113 ; Prothero v. … The trial judge sees the defendant, and is necessarily more or less familiar with the circumstances surrounding him and his case; and the fact that the county board of insanity may have adjudged him insane prior to the time

C. M. G. v. State

594 P.2d 798 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 1, 1979

In Donnelly v. … In United States v.

Williams v. State

321 P.2d 990 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1957

In People v. … Mercy, which this defendant did not extend to his victim, is within the power of the Pardon and Parole Board and the Governor. Art. 6, Sec. 10, Okla. Const.