Case law

Carmack v. State

44 Okla. Crim. 171 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 17, 1929

In the case of Tempy v. State, 9 Okla. … See, also, Vickers v. United States, 1 Okla. Cr. 452 , 98 Pac. 467 ; Hunter v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 533 , 107 Pac. 444 ; Miller v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 255 , 131 Pac. 717 , L. R. A. 1915A, 1088; Littrell v. State, 21 Okla.

Wood v. State

77 Okla. Crim. 305 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1943

The cases were reversed in an opinion, by Justice Roberts, in conformity with the decision of West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 , 63 S. Ct. 1178 , 87 L. Ed. 1628 , decided at the. … Mississippi, supra; West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, supra. From a reading of the opinions of the Supreme Court of the.

In Re Swaim

66 Okla. Crim. 30 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1939

The authorities cited by the petitioners beginning with Pennsylvania Coal Company v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 , 43 S. Ct. 158 , 67 L. Ed. 322 , 28 A.L.R. 1321 , and Burns Baking Company v. Charles W. … Lamm v. Mid-State Serum Company et al., Mo. App., 272 S.

Davis v. State

792 P.2d 76 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 3, 1990

Ca *84 vaness v. State, 581 P.2d 475, 478 (Okl.Cr.1978). Evidence given by a prosecutor could easily carry more weight with a jury than the evidence of other witnesses. Brown v. State, 506 P.2d 1396, 1399 (Okl.Cr.1973). … King v. State, 562 P.2d 902, 904 (Okl.Cr.1977). In Mahan v.

Nichols v. Jackson

72 O.B.A.J. 3717 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 2001

In Press-Enterprise Co. v. … In Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California for Riverside County, 478 U.S. 1 , 106 S.Ct. 2735 , 92 L.Ed.2d 1 (1986) and United States v.

Stewart v. State

4 Okla. Crim. 564 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1910

Neuendorff v. Duryea, 6 Daly (N. Y.) 276; State v. Benedict, 11 Vt. 236 , 34 Am. Dec. 688 . In Galvin v. State, 6 Cold. … The testimony shows that they congregated at a public schoolhouse at night without the permission and against the will of the board of trustees, that they continually rang the large school bell, and whooped and yelled at

McGaughey v. State

72 O.B.A.J. 3431 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 2001

See State v. … Id. at 562 , 103 S.Ct. 1319 (citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975)). . Id. at 562-63, 95 S.Ct. 2254 . . Id. at 563, 95 S.Ct. 2254 (citation omitted). . Id. .

Barnard v. State

76 O.B.A.J. 1873 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 16, 2005

T6 In MceBrain v. … See Atterberry v. State, 1986 OK CR 186 , 731 P.2d 420 (conviction reversed where trial court improperly expanded scope of child abuse statute through inaccurate jury instruction). . See Fontenot v.

State v. Young

70 O.B.A.J. 1076 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1999

. ¶4 In State v. Young, Case No. … . ¶ 18 In Moran , policyholders of the State Insurance Fund sued to enjoin the Fund Commissioners and the Board of Managers from liquidating Fund assets in the amount of $4,000,000.00.

Barrett v. State

57 Okla. Crim. 259 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1935

Green v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 191 , 122 Pac. 1108 ; Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 Pac. 359 . “Direct evidence to establish the corpus delicti is not required. … In Edwards v.

Brumley v. State

85 Okla. Crim. 238 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1947

In the case of Brown v. … Davis v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 453 , 196 P. 146 ; Moody v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 327 , 164 P. 676 ; Hathcoat v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 5 , 107 P. 2d 825 ; Edson v. State, 77 Okla. Cr. 100 , 139 P. 2d 198 . In Haas v.

Denney v. State

346 P.2d 359 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1959

Littke v. … In Chesser v.

Bohannon v. State

271 P.2d 739 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1954

Dobbins v. State, supra; Edwards v. State, supra; O’Donley v. State, 91 Okl.Cr. 352 , 219 P.2d 259 ; Cowley v. State, supra; Dyer v. State, 58 Okl.Cr. 317 , 52 P.2d 1080 ; Goodart v. … See Edwards v. State, supra; State v. McMains, Okl.Cr., 241 P.2d 976 ; State v. Dobbins, supra; Owens v. State, 6 Okl.Cr. 110 , 116 P. 345 , 36 L.R.A.N.S., 633 .

Highfill v. State

26 Okla. Crim. 420 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1924

Also see Meiggs v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 557 , 185 Pac. 450 ; Thompson v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 716 , 184 Pac. 467 ; Johns v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 585 , 129 Pac. 451 ; Cole v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 439 , 195 Pac. 901 ; Mobbs v. … Brown, 28 Or. 147 , 41 Pac. 1042 ; State v. Watkins, 11 Nev. 30 ; State v. Rose, 47 Minn. 47 , 49 N. W. 404 .

Valentine v. State

16 Okla. Crim. 76 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 19, 1919

In the case of U.S. v. … See, also, Walsh v. Patterson, 59 Neb. 645 , 81 N.W. 853 ; Metzer v. State, 39 Ind. 596 ; Patrick v. Crowe, 15 Colo. 543 , 25 P. 985 ; People v. Warren, 122 Mich. 504 ."

Van Paden v. State

13 Okla. Crim. 585 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1917

In the case of Morris v. State, 6 Okla. … See, also, Nelson v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 473 , 106 Pac. 647 ; Hawkins v. U. S., 3 Okla; Cr. 656, 108 Pac. 561 ; Blair v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 365 , 111 Pac. 1003 ; Smith v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 289 , 114 Pac. 350 ; Offitt v.

Magnan v. State

207 P.3d 397 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 22, 2009

v. … Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 541 , 107 S.Ct. 837, 839 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987)).

Grant v. State

58 P.3d 783 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 2003

Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 384 , 106 S.Ct. 2574 , 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986) (quoting Strickland); see also Brown v. … State, 2001 OK CR 11 , 29 P.3d 569, 573-74 (quoting Hawkins); Powell v. State, 1995 OK CR 37 , 906 P.2d 765, 772 , cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1144 , 116 S.Ct. 1438 , 134 L.Ed.2d 560 (1996); Brown v.

CONROY-PEREZ v. STATE

440 P.3d 64 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2019

In Philpott v. … Essex County Welfare Board, 409 U.S. 413, 415-17, 93 S.Ct. 590, 592-93, 34 L.Ed.2d 608 (1973), the United States Supreme Court held that Social Security funds were protected from claims by state governments.

Wright v. State

535 P.2d 315 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 5, 1975

Rather, as in Hester v. … Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435 , 53 S.Ct. 210 , 77 L.Ed. 413 ; Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369 , 78 S.Ct. 819 , 2 L.Ed.2d 848 ; Masciale v.