Case law

McKee v. Page

438 P.2d 649 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1968

In Traxler v. … {See, however, Moulthrope v.

Handley v. State

65 Okla. Crim. 268 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1938

Dec. 317 ; Martin v. Hostetter, 59 Okla. 246 , 158 P. 1174 ; Conditt v. McKinley, 94 Okla. 266 , 221 P. 1007 ; Dunn v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 76 , 267 P. 279 ; Myers v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 170 , 267 P. 867 ; Murray v. … McHenry *274 v. State, 61 Okla. Cr. 450 , 69 P. 2d 90 ; Denton v. State, 62 Okla. Cr. 8 , 70 P. 2d 135 ; Rhodes v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 124 , 267 P. 490 ; Phillips v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 52 , 244 P. 451 ; Cahill v.

WITHEROW v. STATE

2017 OK CR 17 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 2017

In Hain v. … One Chicago Coin's Play Boy Marble Board v. State ex rel. Adams , 1949 OK 251, ¶ 21, 202 Okla. 246, 249, 212 P.2d 129, 133. 3 The Court unanimously reached the same conclusion in Speed v. State , No. F-2015-35 (Okl.Cr.

Rutan v. State

202 P.3d 839 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 2009

Scott v. … See Revilla v.

Ezell v. State

66 O.B.A.J. 3913 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1995

Edmonson v. … See, e.g., Guy v. State, 778 P.2d 470, 476 (Okl.Cr.1989); Brown v. State, 762 P.2d 959, 962 (Okl.Cr.1988); Johnson v. State, 761 P.2d 484, 490 (Okl.Cr.1988); Johnson v.

Hankins v. State

62 Okla. Crim. 252 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1937

Birmingham a time or two, and finally told the other officers to get the cuffs and a board and he would make them tell the truth about the mules. … Flynn v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 41 , 133 Pac. 1133 ; Kirk v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 281 , 135 Pac. 1156 ; McKinney v. State, 20 Okla. Cr. 134 , 201 Pac. 673 ; Powell v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 332 , 207 Pac. 570 ; Wever v.

Newsted v. State

720 P.2d 734 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1986

Jones v. … State, 617 P.2d 223 (Okl.Cr.1980); and, Chaney v. State, 612 P.2d 269 (Okl.Cr.1980), modified on other grounds, sub nom., Chaney v. Brown, 730 F.2d 1334 (10th Cir.1984). . Parker v.

Davis v. State

65 Okla. Crim. 306 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 29, 1938

Howell v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 292 , 243 P. 997 ; Wiese v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 203 , 240 P. 1075 ; McClary v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 403 , 246 P. 891 ; Kohler v. U. S., 9 Cir., 9 F. 2d 23 . In the case of Reutlinger v. … This question has been before this court on many occasions, commencing with Brown v. State, 3 Okla.

Sheppard v. State

306 P.2d 346 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1957

Witness said, however, that he was not classified with the board of education as an assistant to the supervisor of census and attendance. … See School Board District No. 18, Garvin County v.

Hair v. State

532 P.2d 72 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1974

Board.” … See White v. State, Okl.Cr., 498 P.2d 421 (1972) and Igo v. State, Okl.Cr., 267 P.2d 1082 (1954).

Chuculate v. State

487 P.2d 1000 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1971

See: Powell v. State, Okl. Cr., 478 P.2d 923 (1970), Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L. Ed.2d 1247 (1968); and Thompson v. State, Okl.Cr., 438 P.2d 287 (1968). … That is a matter provided for by the Pardon and Parole Board and is not a consideration for the court or the jury under any circumstances.

Perkins v. State

35 Okla. Crim. 279 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1926

Brown v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 394 , 188 P. 1097 . … Henry v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 369 , 136 P. 982 , 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 113; Blanck v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 339 , 169 P. 1130 ; Rogers v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 277 , 131 P. 941 ; Rhea v. Ter., 3 Okla. Cr. 230 , 105 P. 314 .

Huckaby v. State

94 Okla. Crim. 29 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1951

This rule has been approved by the Kansas court in the later cases of State v. Craig, 124 Kan. 340 , 259 P. 802 , 54 A. L. R. 1233, and State v. Dye, 148 Kan. 421 , 83 P. 2d 113 . In Zell v. State, 189 Ind. 433 , 127 N. … To the same effect is State v. Falsetta, 43 Wash. 159 , 86 P. 168 , 10 Ann. Cas. 177, and State v. Dejean, 159 La. 900 , 106 So. 374 . The reason for the rule is stated in 22 C. J.

Hatch v. State

662 P.2d 1377 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1983

The requirement of consent by the State and judge as set forth in Crawford v. Brown, 536 P.2d 988 (Okl.Cr.1975) was met. Accordingly, the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails. II. … Fox v. State, 524 P.2d 60 (Okl.Cr.1974). In Fox , citing from Pereira v.

Price v. Territory

1 Okla. Crim. 508 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1909

The state of Florida at the time of the trial of the above-entitled case had a statute known as above stated, providing a time for the board of county commissioners to select from the registered voters of their respective … See, also, State v. Bates, 38 La. 491 ; State v. Holcombe, 41 La. Ann. 1066 , 6 South 758; Buel v. People, 78 N. Y. 492 , 34 Am. Rep. 555 ; Mitchell v. Com., 75 Va. 856 ; Stone v. State, 42 Ind. 418 .

Sherrill v. State

47 Okla. Crim. 275 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1930

Bulls v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 64 , 241 Pac. 605 . What were the surrounding circumstances in this case? … Loudermilk v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 146 , 242 Pac. 1060 . *282 The defendants next complain of the instructions of the court.

Miller v. State

29 P.3d 1077 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 17, 2001

See also Salazar v. … The victim's mother, Lillian Brown, also testified that Appellant should, in her opinion, receive the death penalty. When asked why, Ms. Brown testified, "He's a menace and a threat to everyone in society.

Russell v. State

17 Okla. Crim. 164 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1920

Cr. 362 , 102 Pac. 57 , Brown v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 442 , 106 Pac. 808 , Nowlin v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 27 , 115 Pac. 625 , 121 Pac. 791 , Weinberger v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 441 , 128 Pac. 160 , Teer v. State, 10 Okla. … In McDonald v.

Grimes v. State

365 P.2d 739 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1961

McNutt v. State, Okl.Cr., 288 P.2d 418 ; Nelson v. State, Okl.Cr., 288 P.2d 429 ; Brock v. State, Okl.Cr., 349 P.2d 20 ; Hudman v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 160 , 205 P.2d 1175 ; Cody v. State, Okl.Cr., 361 P.2d 307 ; Pate v. … Defendant said he took a .22 rifle upstairs and put it in the gun rack or on the ironing board.

STATE v. COUSAN

447 P.3d 481 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 15, 2019

United States v. … See also Nix v.