Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

3,434 results

1.25s

  • Gonzales v. State

    507 P.2d 1277 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1973

    Roy Bryson, the wrecker driver, testified that he inventoried the defendant’s car and found three bottles and a syringe in a brown paper sack on the floorboard. … California, 395 U.S. 752 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969), and followed in Fields v. State, Okl.Cr., 463 P.2d 1000 (1970).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Pettigrew v. State

    346 P.2d 957 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1959

    “In Ward v. … Also, Brown v. State, 9 Okl.Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 ; Choate v. State, 12 Okl.Cr. 560 , 160 P. 34 , L.R.A.1917A, 1287; Edwards v. State, 46 Okl.Cr. 77 , 288 P. 359 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Anderson

    513 P.2d 345 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1973

    See: People v. Kowalsky, 2 N.Y.2d 949 , 162 N.Y.S.2d 355 , 142 N.E.2d 421 ; Montford v. Wainwright, 162 So.2d 663 (Florida 1964); State v. Rhodes, 77 N.M. 536 , 425 P.2d 47 ; 24 B C.J.S. Criminal Law § 1995(4). … As other corollaries it might be suggested that he is liable in quasi-contract for the value of his board and lodging, and criminally liable for obtaining them by false pretenses. We cannot take this optimistic view."

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hays v. State

    38 Okla. Crim. 331 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1927

    In this room the officers found an opening about three and one-half feet square in the beaver board ceiling. … Levy v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 199 , 238 P. 235 ; Best v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 89 , 240 P. 159 ; McClary v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 403 , 246 P. 891 ; Whitford v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 22 , 247 P. 424 ; Ellis v. State, 34 Okla.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. State

    401 P.2d 199 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 1965

    Nevertheless, in the early case of Queen v. … See, also, Keck v. State, Okl.Cr., 376 P.2d 525 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Evinger v. State

    57 Okla. Crim. 63 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 23, 1935

    Canard v. State, 2 Okla Cr. 505, 103 Pac. 737, 881 , 139 Am. St. Rep. 949 ; Muldrow v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 549 , 185 Pac. 332 ; Simpson v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 533 , 185 Pac. 116 ; Ralston v. State, 16 Okla. … Cr. 634 , 185 Pac. 831 ; Browning v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 373 , 239 Pac. 272 ; Ables v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 26 , 247 Pac. 423 ; Neff v. State, 39 Okla. Cr. 133 , 264 Pac. 649 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Williams v. State

    4 Okla. Crim. 523 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1910

    In Spawn, v. … Wilson v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep. 22; Norris v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep. 172; Rahm v. State, 30 Texas Crim. App. 310; House v. State, 19 Texas Crim. App. 227.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    83 Okla. Crim. 209 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1946

    E. 779 ; State v. Newell, 134 Minn. 384 , 159 N. W. 829 ; State v. Rowley, 197 Iowa 977 , 195 N. W. 881 ; State v. Brown, 3 Boyce (Del.) 499, 85 A. 797, 800 ; State v. Doty, 167 Minn. 164 , 208 N. W. 760, 761 ; Rex. v. … State v. Brown, supra: The following is pertinent from State v. Doty, supra: ‘There was evidence of two other abortions performed about the same time.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Sturns v. State

    46 Okla. Crim. 322 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1930

    In Murby v. U. … In Lindsay v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pickens v. State

    600 P.2d 356 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1979

    In Fowler v. … Moon v. State, Okl.Cr., 475 P.2d 410 (1970); Tarter v. State, Okl.Cr., 359 P.2d 596 (1961); Payne v. State, 10 Okl.Cr. 314 , 136 P. 201 (1913). Thus, we held in Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • CONROY-PEREZ v. STATE

    440 P.3d 64 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 2019

    In Philpott v. … State Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McGlumphy v. State

    538 P.2d 1097 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1975

    An oft-repeated rule of this Court as to corroboration of an accomplice was set forth in Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 518 P.2d 898 (1974), wherein we stated, at page 901: “ . . . … In Whiteley v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Scott v. State

    67 O.B.A.J. 3572 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1996

    Two officers will then board the bus and pull the bags from the overhead compartments so that a drug dog can sniff the bags. … As this Court set forth in Smith v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Hammond

    775 P.2d 826 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1989

    Davis v. State, 300 P.2d 1000, 1007 (Okl.Cr.1956). The legislative intent should be sought in the ordinary meaning of the words of a statute, construed in view of the connection in which they are used. Brown v. … In State v.

    Overruled on other grounds by State v. Young, 65 O.B.A.J. 1571 (1994)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Sandy v. State

    94 Okla. Crim. 80 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 2, 1951

    Wayne V. … Graham v. State, 80 Okla. Cr. 159 , 157 P. 2d 758 ; Coats v. State, 90 Okla. Cr., 217 , 212 P. 2d 141 ; Brown v. State, 92 Okla. Cr. 448, 224 , P. 2d 614, and cases cited in these cases.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ake v. State

    778 P.2d 460 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1989

    Ake, 470 U.S. at 83 , 105 S.Ct. at 1096 ; Brown v. State, 743 P.2d 133, 137 (Okla.Crim.App.1987). … As we stated in Brown , “an indigent defendant is not entitled to public funds to ‘shop around’ until he finds a ‘hired gun’ with a favorable opinion.” 743 P.2d at 137. See also DeBolt v.

    Overruled in part by TAYLOR v. STATE, 2018 OK CR 6 (2018)Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Taua v. State

    484 P.2d 540 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1971

    He observed clothing laying on right front floor board of the 1963 red Ford and upon removing the clothing he found a billfold. The items were introduced into evidence without objection. … The trial court excused the jury and conducted a Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Daniel v. State

    67 Okla. Crim. 174 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 15, 1939

    The defendant was working with a nail bar in removing some of the boards from the partition. … In Nelson v. State, 34 Okla.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Feige v. State

    23 Okla. Crim. 434 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1923

    of the amended information in this ease is as follows: “Said defendant did then and there unlawfully, wrongfully, and willfully practice medicine within the State of Oklahoma, without first having obtained from the state board … Hughes v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 117 , 122 Pac. 555 ; State v. Zanger, 9 Okla. Cr. 122 , 130 Pac. 1107 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BENCH v. STATE

    504 P.3d 592 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 2021

    See Harris v. State , 2007 OK CR 32, ¶ 2 , 167 P.3d 438, 441 ; Browning v. State , 2006 OK CR 37, ¶ 2 , 144 P.3d 155, 156 ; Murphy v. State , 2005 OK CR 25, ¶ 3 , 124 P.3d 1198, 1199 . … STATE Discussed 2005 OK CR 25 , 124 P.3d 1198 , MURPHY v. STATE Discussed at Length 2006 OK CR 37 , 144 P.3d 155 , BROWNING v. STATE Discussed 2007 OK CR 32 , 167 P.3d 438 , HARRIS v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.