Case law

Jackson v. Page

431 P.2d 666 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1967

The records obtained from the Pardon and Parole Board reveal that this is not the first term of imprisonment to which petitioner has been subjected, as he served time in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in 1959; therefore, … See also Application of Roberson, Okl.Cr., 400 P.2d 459 and Lott v. State, Okl.Cr., 376 P.2d 634 . Under the authority of Application of Roberson and Lott v.

Cornelious v. Adkisson

394 P.2d 651 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1964

any public building, except for the purpose of dispatching business with the public corporation shall in each and every case constitute a trespass unless the manner; purpose and extent of its use is first presented to the Board … The recent case of Lock, et al, v. Falkenstine, Okl.Cr., 380 P.2d 278 ; comprehensively lays down the standards by which penal statutes or ordinances are to be measured.

Ex Parte Munger

29 Okla. Crim. 407 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1925

was finally discharged, because the funds for holding such court had become exhausted; that no more funds will be available for the holding of a jury term of court in said county until after July, 1925, unless the excise board … Eubanks v. Cale, 4 Okla.

Childs v. State

47 Okla. Crim. 86 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1930

A board had been sawed in such a manner that a short piece of floor could be lifted out, and three pints of whisky were concealed in this hole and a rug on the floor spread over the opening. … Worley v. State, 42 Okla. Cr. 243 , 275 Pac. 398 ; Husband v. State, 45 Okla. Cr. 406 , 283 Pac. 584 ; Ryan v. State, 46 Okla. Cr. 5 , 283 Pac. 809 .

Spencer v. State

404 P.2d 46 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 5, 1965

Brown. * * * “Q. What were your instructions as to how he was to perform that test? 'A. … See, Apodoca v. State, supra; Allbright v. State, 92 Ga.App. 251 , 88 S.E.2d 468 ; Bates v. State, 40 Ala.App. 549 , 117 So.2d 258 .

Freeman v. State

65 Okla. Crim. 40 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 2, 1938

In Love v. State, 12 Okla. … Brown v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 115 , 167 P. 762 . *47 We have refrained from discussing the evidence and the other errors assigned for the reason that this case will be tried again.

LEE v. STATE

2018 OK CR 14 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 31, 2018

The fact that the Pardon and Parole Board has arbitrarily set forty-five (45) years as the number the Board will use to comply with the "Forgotten Man Act", 57 O.S.Supp.2013 § 332.7, does not affect the actual sentence; that … number affects only when the Board will consider the inmate for purposes of parole.

Glenn v. State

77 Okla. Crim. 124 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1943

conducted, he was keeping a Avatch on these premises, and that he saAV a black car drive up and saw the defendant come out of the house and hand a package through the window of the car; that the package Avas wrapped in brown … Defendant complains that the judgment and sentence is excessive in this case, and cites the case of Harmon v. *129 State, 75 Okla. Cr. 37 , 128 P. 2d 237 . The facts in that case are not applicable to- the facts here.

Griffin v. State

453 P.2d 278 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1969

This Court, in view of Sheppard v. Maxwell, supra, held in Shapard v. … The trial court allowed this testimony into evidence and defendant, in claiming that it was error, cites Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 , 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966); and, Brown v.

Roberson v. State

362 P.2d 1115 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1961

London v. State, Okl. Cr., 297 P.2d 567 ; Dixon v. State, 95 Okl. Cr. 207, 242 P.2d 474 . In Brown v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 389 , 208 P.2d 1143 , we held that appeal by petition! … In Caples v.

Thompson v. State

365 P.2d 834 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1961

The attorney general agrees that the case of Edwards v. State, supra, succinctly sets forth the law applicable in the case at bar. … In the case of Hawkins v.

Ford v. State

52 Okla. Crim. 321 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1931

Newby v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 291 , 188 Pac. 124 ; Ussaery v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 397 , 212 Pac. 137 ; Smith v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 383 , 212 Pac. 1012 . … Adeaholt v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 122 , 198 Pac. 351 ; Campbell v. State, 23 Okla. Cr. 250 , 214 Pac. 738 ; Pickett v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 60 , 248 Pac. 352 ; Mayse v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 144 , 259 Pac. 277 .

Keltner v. State

52 Okla. Crim. 150 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1931

Brown: Incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial, and states that if he did talk to anybody else it would not be competent in this trial. By the Court: Sustained. Exception. Mr. … In Lazenby v. State, 18 Okla.

Committi v. State

28 Okla. Crim. 385 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1924

“No warrant shall be issued to search a private residence, occupied as such, unless it, or some part of it, is used as a store, shop, hotel, boarding house, or place for storage, or unless such residence is a place of public … See companion case of Committi v. State, 28 Okla. Cr. 380 , 231 P. 316 , for authorities collated on this question.

Marr v. State

513 P.2d 324 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 1, 1973

In Baeza v. … In Conway v.

Hanlan v. State

96 Okla. Crim. 331 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1953

Waters v. State, 87 Okla. Cr. 236 , 197 P. 2d 299 ; Brannon v. State, Okla. Cr. App., 234 P. 2d 934 ; Kizer v. State, Okla. Cr. App., 249 P. 2d 132 ; Ex parte Brown, 77 Okla. Cr. 96 , 139 P. 2d 196 .

Satepeahtaw v. State

595 P.2d 805 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 23, 1979

(For their appeal, see DeLaune v. State, Okl.Cr., 569 P.2d 463 [1977].) During this period, defendant Bointy served on the Authority’s Board of Directors. … In Estes v.

McNeely v. Page

427 P.2d 652 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 3, 1967

The records obtained from the Pardon and Parole Board reveal that this is not the first term of imprisonment to which petitioner has been subjected, as he served time in the Texas Penitentiary at Huntsville, Texas; therefore … See also Application of Roberson, *653 Okl.Cr., 400 P.2d 459 and Lott v. State, Old. Cr., 376 P.2d 634 . Under the authority of Application of Roberson and Lott v.

Bechtel v. State

63 O.B.A.J. 2499 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 2, 1992

Jamison v. … v.

McClintoc v. State

24 Okla. Crim. 442 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1923

Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282 , 187 Pac. 930 ; Brown v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 505 , 184 Pac. 912 ; Alexander v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 200 , 153 Pac. 619 .