Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoklaag

2,251 results

2.00s

  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 2001

    No. 89 v. Okla. City Fed'n of Teachers Local 2309, 612 P.2d 719 , 722 (Okla. 1980) (citing Rogers v. Okla. … Bd. of Tr. of Firemen's Relief Pension Fund v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2007)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 1, 2007

    In Marley v. … See Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980) . 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 18, 2001

    See City of Hugo v. State ex rel. Pub. Employees Relations Bd., 886 P.2d 485 , 492 (Okla. 1994). … See, e.g., FDA v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp., 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 1297 (2000). ¶ 2 The Oklahoma Scenic Rivers Commission's (the "Commission") authority derives from the Scenic Rivers Act.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1990

    INC., 751 P.2D 1070 (OKLA. 1988); HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). STATUTES SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS WHOLE, SO TO GIVE EFFECT, IF POSSIBLE, TO ALL OF THEIR PROVISIONS. COWART V. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Question Submitted by: The Honorable Dustin Roberts, Oklahoma State Representative, District 21

    2014 OK AG 13 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 2014

    Smith v. State Bd. of Equalization , 1981 OK 57, ¶ 9, 630 P.2d 1264, 1267. … See Edmondson v. Pearce , 2004 OK 23, ¶ 72, 91 P.3d 605, 635.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 29, 2001

    Bankers Ass'n v. Okla. … First Title Trust Co. v. First Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n, 415 P.2d 930 , 939 (Okla. 1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 78-300 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 4, 1979

    , as authorized by state and federal law, for special education purposes and further that ample authority exists for local school district applications for such funding to be received, reviewed and approved by the State Board … Refer, generally, Nicholson v. Pittenger, 364 F. Supp. 669 (U.S.D.C., E.D. Penn., 1973), Natonabah v. Bd. Education, 355 F. Supp. 716 (U.S.D.C., D.N.M., 1973); Alexander v. Califano, 432 F. Supp. 1182 (U.S.D.C., N.D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 2003

    In the next year a millage rate adjustment is calculated for all enacted millage prescribed by the applicable sections of Articles V and X of the Oklahoma Constitution. … KINNEY Assistant Attorney General 1 According to the 2002 Progress Report to the Legislature and the State Board of Equalization on County Visual Inspection Programs, prepared by the Oklahoma Tax Commission, the following

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-261 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1968

    In Watton v. … In Tulsa County v. St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 2001

    See Battiest v. State, 755 P.2d 688 , 689 (Okla.Crim. 1988); Grand Jury v. … In Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-244 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 4, 1970

    The two corporations enjoy the same Board of Directors and Officers. … In Wallace v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1988

    AMF Tubescope v. Hatchel, 547 P.2d 374 (Okla. 1976). … Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 (Okla. 1980). ¶ 10 It is, therefore, the official opinion of the Attorney General that: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 15, 2005

    Oliver v. City of Tulsa, 654 P.2d 607 , 611 (Okla. 1982). … Sharp v. Tulsa County Election Bd., 890 P.2d 836 , 840 (Okla. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1979

    receive more than ten percent (10%) of the net receipts from the solicitation contributions, nor where the charitable organization whose name is used would receive less than ninety percent (90%) of said receipts, nor when the board … Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County v. Albus, 572 P.2d 554 (1977); Street v. Bethany Fireman's Relief and Pension Fund, 555 P.2d 1295 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 78-309 (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978

    In Shotts v. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1996)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 15, 1996

    The fund shall be nonfiscal and shall not be considered in computing any levy when the municipality makes its estimate to the excise board for needed appropriations. . . . C. … The initiative and referendum provisions of Articles V and XVIII, as well as other fundamental concepts of constitutional law, must be reviewed. ¶ 6 In Granger v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1979

    receive more than ten percent (10%) of the net receipts from the solicitation contributions, nor where the charitable organization whose name is used would receive less than ninety percent (90%) of said receipts, nor when the board … Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County v. Albus, 572 P.2d 554 (1977); Street v. Bethany Fireman's Relief and Pension Fund, 555 P.2d 1295 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 1992

    HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA.1985). WORDS IN A STATUTE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A CONTRARY LEGISLATIVE DEFINITION, MUST BE GIVEN THE SAME MEANING ATTRIBUTED TO THEM IN ORDINARY PARLANCE. … CRANDON V. U.S., 110 S.CT. 997 , 494 U.S. 152 , 108 L.ED.2D 132 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1993)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 1993

    SESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA.1985). WORDS IN A STATUTE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A CONTRARY LEGISLATIVE DEFINITION, MUST BE GIVEN THE SAME MEANING ATTRIBUTED TO THEM IN ORDINARY PARLANCE. … CRANDON V. U.S., 110 S.CT. 997 , 494 U.S. 152 , 108 L.ED.2D 132 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 14, 1992

    Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 (Okla. 1982). … Cave Springs Public School District I-30 v. Blair, 613 P.2d 1046 (Okla. 1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.