Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
2.00s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 2001
No. 89 v. Okla. City Fed'n of Teachers Local 2309, 612 P.2d 719 , 722 (Okla. 1980) (citing Rogers v. Okla. … Bd. of Tr. of Firemen's Relief Pension Fund v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 1, 2007
In Marley v. … See Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980) . 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 18, 2001
See City of Hugo v. State ex rel. Pub. Employees Relations Bd., 886 P.2d 485 , 492 (Okla. 1994). … See, e.g., FDA v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp., 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 1297 (2000). ¶ 2 The Oklahoma Scenic Rivers Commission's (the "Commission") authority derives from the Scenic Rivers Act.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1990
INC., 751 P.2D 1070 (OKLA. 1988); HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA. 1985). STATUTES SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS WHOLE, SO TO GIVE EFFECT, IF POSSIBLE, TO ALL OF THEIR PROVISIONS. COWART V. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: The Honorable Dustin Roberts, Oklahoma State Representative, District 21
2014 OK AG 13 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 2014
Smith v. State Bd. of Equalization , 1981 OK 57, ¶ 9, 630 P.2d 1264, 1267. … See Edmondson v. Pearce , 2004 OK 23, ¶ 72, 91 P.3d 605, 635.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 29, 2001
Bankers Ass'n v. Okla. … First Title Trust Co. v. First Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n, 415 P.2d 930 , 939 (Okla. 1965).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 4, 1979
, as authorized by state and federal law, for special education purposes and further that ample authority exists for local school district applications for such funding to be received, reviewed and approved by the State Board … Refer, generally, Nicholson v. Pittenger, 364 F. Supp. 669 (U.S.D.C., E.D. Penn., 1973), Natonabah v. Bd. Education, 355 F. Supp. 716 (U.S.D.C., D.N.M., 1973); Alexander v. Califano, 432 F. Supp. 1182 (U.S.D.C., N.D.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 2003
In the next year a millage rate adjustment is calculated for all enacted millage prescribed by the applicable sections of Articles V and X of the Oklahoma Constitution. … KINNEY Assistant Attorney General 1 According to the 2002 Progress Report to the Legislature and the State Board of Equalization on County Visual Inspection Programs, prepared by the Oklahoma Tax Commission, the following
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1968
In Watton v. … In Tulsa County v. St.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 2001
See Battiest v. State, 755 P.2d 688 , 689 (Okla.Crim. 1988); Grand Jury v. … In Oklahoma City v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 4, 1970
The two corporations enjoy the same Board of Directors and Officers. … In Wallace v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1988
AMF Tubescope v. Hatchel, 547 P.2d 374 (Okla. 1976). … Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 (Okla. 1980). ¶ 10 It is, therefore, the official opinion of the Attorney General that: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 15, 2005
Oliver v. City of Tulsa, 654 P.2d 607 , 611 (Okla. 1982). … Sharp v. Tulsa County Election Bd., 890 P.2d 836 , 840 (Okla. 1994).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1979
receive more than ten percent (10%) of the net receipts from the solicitation contributions, nor where the charitable organization whose name is used would receive less than ninety percent (90%) of said receipts, nor when the board … Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County v. Albus, 572 P.2d 554 (1977); Street v. Bethany Fireman's Relief and Pension Fund, 555 P.2d 1295 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978
In Shotts v. … In Board of County Commissioners v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 15, 1996
The fund shall be nonfiscal and shall not be considered in computing any levy when the municipality makes its estimate to the excise board for needed appropriations. . . . C. … The initiative and referendum provisions of Articles V and XVIII, as well as other fundamental concepts of constitutional law, must be reviewed. ¶ 6 In Granger v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 1979
receive more than ten percent (10%) of the net receipts from the solicitation contributions, nor where the charitable organization whose name is used would receive less than ninety percent (90%) of said receipts, nor when the board … Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County v. Albus, 572 P.2d 554 (1977); Street v. Bethany Fireman's Relief and Pension Fund, 555 P.2d 1295 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 1992
HESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA.1985). WORDS IN A STATUTE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A CONTRARY LEGISLATIVE DEFINITION, MUST BE GIVEN THE SAME MEANING ATTRIBUTED TO THEM IN ORDINARY PARLANCE. … CRANDON V. U.S., 110 S.CT. 997 , 494 U.S. 152 , 108 L.ED.2D 132 (1991).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 1993
SESS V. EXCISE BOARD OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY, 698 P.2D 930 (OKLA.1985). WORDS IN A STATUTE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A CONTRARY LEGISLATIVE DEFINITION, MUST BE GIVEN THE SAME MEANING ATTRIBUTED TO THEM IN ORDINARY PARLANCE. … CRANDON V. U.S., 110 S.CT. 997 , 494 U.S. 152 , 108 L.ED.2D 132 (1991).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 14, 1992
Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 (Okla. 1982). … Cave Springs Public School District I-30 v. Blair, 613 P.2d 1046 (Okla. 1980).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna