Case law

Opinion No. 69-102 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1969

(Emphasis added) "Generally the board of directors has the right to designate a stated value per share; in some states the amount which the directors elect to establish as stated value per share cannot be less than a minimum … Detroit Mortgage Corporation v. Secretary of State, 211 Mich. 320 , 178 N.W. 697 , 182 N.W. 526 .

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 2000

Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983); Acevedo v. City of Muskogee, 897 P.2d 256 (Okla. 1995); and United States v. … In Civil Service Comm'n v.

Question Submitted by: Senator Mary B. Boren, Oklahoma State Senate, District 16

2024 OK AG 5 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2024

Hatfield v. Jimerson, 1961 OK 250, ¶ 9 , 365 P.2d 980, 982 (quoting State ex rel. Tayrien v. … , Transportation Commission, ODOT County Advisory Board, ODOT Tribal Advisory Board, Committee on the Pilot Shortage, Highway Construction Materials Technician Certification Board, Interstate Midwest Reginal Passenger Rail

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1991

E.Q., HUGHES V. COMMONWEALTH DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, 523 A.2D 747 (PA. 1987); VEROCHI V. COMMONWEALTH, 477 N.E.2D 366 (MASS. 1985); DOTSON V. ARUNDEL COUNTY, 451 A.2D 317 (MD. 1982); CITY SERVICE GAS CO. V. … SEE KADMAS V. DICKINSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 487 U.S. 459 , 101 L.ED.2D 399, 108 S.CT. 2481 (1988); CLEGQ V. OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD, 637 P.2D 103 (OKLA. 1981). SEE ALSO GOODMAN V.

Opinion No. (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 12, 1993

V. … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666, 668 (OKLA. 1973). THERE IS NO STATUTORY PROHIBITION AGAINST TEMPORARY SALES.

Opinion No. 93-573 (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 12, 1993

V. … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD V. MOSS, 509 P.2D 666, 668 (OKLA. 1973). THERE IS NO STATUTORY PROHIBITION AGAINST TEMPORARY SALES.

Opinion No. 76-398 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1977

Taylor v. Cockrell, 27 Okl. 630 , 112 P. 1000 (1910), established that the State Examiner and Inspector acts within his constitutional authority independent of the Governor's office. … department, and all commissioners and superintendents, and boards of control of state institutions, and all other officers entrusted with the collection, receipt, custody or disbursement of the revenue or moneys of the state

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 1997

Nelson v. Pollay, 916 P.2d 1369 , 1373 (Okla. 1996). … See also, City of Hugo v. State ex rel.

Opinion No. 68-155 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1968

Where a special fund is created from sources not coming from, or out of, the general revenue fund of the state, the authority to the official board or commission to spend said fund for a special purpose may be granted where … In Edwards v.

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2004

Grand River Dam Auth. v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1019 (Okla. 1982) (footnotes omitted). … Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff's F.O.P., Lodge No. 188 v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 959 P.2d 979 , 981 (Okla. 1998); Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff's F.O.P., Lodge No. 188 v.

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2009

Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980); see also Shipp v. Se. Okla. Indus. Auth. , 498 P.2d 1395 , 1398 (Okla. 1972); Morris v. City of Okla. … Id. ; Shipp v. Se. Okla. Indus. Auth. , 498 P.2d 1395 , 1398 (Okla. 1972) Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). 3.

Opinion No. (1990) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1990

AT 142, QUOTING WILLIAMS V. LEE, 358 U.S. 217 , 220 (1959). … CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 800 F.2D 1446 (9TH CIR. 1986) (ALLOWING SIMILAR TAXATION OF CIGARETTES); COTTON PETROLEUM CORP.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1979

In State v. … Comr's of the Land Office v. Board of Comr's of Woods County, Okl. 257 P. 778 (1927); Popp et al. v. Munger, et al. Okl. 268 P. 1100 (1928); and State ex rel. Comr's of the Land Office v.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 24, 1995

Union Trust Co. v. Cox, 155 P. 206 , 209 (Okla. 1916). … Scott-Rice Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 503 P.2d 208 (Okla. 1972). To date no court has found the statutory definition unconstitutional.

Opinion No. (1987) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 1987

SETTLES V. BOARD OF ED. OF DEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. … IN SO RULING, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RELIED ON THE STATE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN STATE V.

Opinion No. (1991)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1991

HOWEVER, OKLAHOMA DOES RECOGNIZE AN IMPLIED WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY THEORY OF RECOVERY IN JONES V. GATEWOOD, 381 P.2D 158 (OKLA. 1963). … V. BANFIELD, 363 P.2D 942 (OKLA. 1961).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1994

BOYDSTON V. STATE, 277 P.2D 138 (OKLA.1954). … TITLE 60 O.S. 384 (1991) PROVIDES: "ANY PROPERTY INVOLVED IN A GIFT, TESTAMENTARY OR OTHERWISE, GIVEN TO THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA OR SOME STATE OFFICER, BOARD, COMMISSION, OR AGENCY FOR THE USE OR BENEFIT OF A SPECIFIED STATE

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 6, 1995

solely for enforcement of controlled dangerous substances laws, drug abuse prevention and drug abuse education, and maintained by the district attorney in his discretion for those purposes with a yearly accounting to the board … Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission, 764 P.2d 172 (Okla. 1988).

Opinion No. 78-259 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 6, 1978

Horath v. Pierce, Okl., 506 P.2d 548 (1973); State ex rel. Hampton v. Oakes, Okl., 281 P.2d 749 (1955). … Board of Elections, 262 N.Y. 430 , 187 N.E. 566 1933 ). The Supreme Court of Oklahoma has similarly stated (Peterson v.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1995

Dubuque Packing Company, Inc. v. Fitzgibbon, 599 P.2d 440 (Okla.Ct.App. 1979). … Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan, 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982). Where the language of a statue is plain and unambiguous, there is no room for construction. Cavett v.