Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
2.88s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 1998
Fuller v. … ISD 89 of Oklahoma County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 28, 2005
The fund shall be nonfiscal and shall not be considered in computing any levy when the municipality makes its estimate to the excise board for needed appropriations. … Id. ; see Nordlinger v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978
Argonaut Division v. Cook, 528 P.2d 1110 (Okl. 1974) . … Sewer Systems — Solid Waste Fills — Waste Treatment Plants — Permits — Investigations — Industrial Waste. ". . . " (c) Whenever complaints shall be made to the Commissioner by the Mayor of any city, or the President of the Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1969
(Emphasis added) "Generally the board of directors has the right to designate a stated value per share; in some states the amount which the directors elect to establish as stated value per share cannot be less than a minimum … Detroit Mortgage Corporation v. Secretary of State, 211 Mich. 320 , 178 N.W. 697 , 182 N.W. 526 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1997
Quinlan v. Koch Oil Company, 25 F.3d 936 , 941 (10th Cir. 1994) ( citing Texas County Irrigation Water Resources Association v. … Sinclair Oil Gas v. Bishop, 441 P.2d 436 (Okla. 1967) and Tom P. McDermott, Inc. v. Bennett, 395 P.2d 566 (Okla. 1964). 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 1971
the question of whether outside audits might be made under a statute which specifically provides for auditing by the State Examiner and Inspector, the Oklahoma Supreme Court stated in News-Dispatch Printing and Audit Co. v. … Board of Commissioners of Grady County, 61 Okl. 259 , 161 P. 207 (1916) as follows: ". . .The statute has furnished it in the instrumentality of the office of State Examiner and Inspector.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1972
Even though all "private" firemen receive a pay increase after ninety days of service, this increase is not due to longevity or merit since it is an across the board increase and not in recognition of individual achievement … McVicker v. Bd. of Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 , 302 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 1992
BANKING BOARD OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, 704 P.2D 490 (OKLA.1985). … WALLACE V. BREWER, 315 F.SUPP. 431 (D.C.ALA.1970).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1972
The case of Laininger, et al. v. Ward-Beekman Brooks, Inc., Okl., 282 P. 467 (1929), the Court stated in syllabus four: "Limitations provided by (statute) has a definite purpose. … Title 61 O.S. 51 [ 61-51 ] (1971) states: "All agencies, boards, commissions, offices, institutions, or other governmental bodies of the State of Oklahoma, and all individuals making purchases on behalf of such governmental
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 1997
Nelson v. Pollay, 916 P.2d 1369 , 1373 (Okla. 1996). … See also, City of Hugo v. State ex rel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1978
This act shall not apply to school board or bond election. … Ridley Packing Company v. Holliday, 467 P.2d 480 (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: Glen D. Johnson, Chancellor, Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education
2015 OK AG 13 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 2015
Twin Hills Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Forest Park , 2005 OK 71, ¶ 6 , 123 P.3d 5, 6 . … Fourth, the course must be approved for credit by the State Board of Education and the independent district board of education.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1975
In Leeper v. … In Maryland Casualty Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: The Honorable Brenda Stanley, Oklahoma State Senate, District 42
2024 OK AG 8 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 2024
There, this office concluded that even a contract between a public utility and a state agency board, where the officer of the State was also an employee of the public utility, could be defined as receipt of interest, profit … West Discussed 1980 OK CR 86 , 620 P.2d 408 , STATE v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1988
V. BANKING BD. OF STATE OF OKLAHOMA, 704 P.2D 490 (OKLA. 1985). … V. PANAMA-WILLIAMS. INC., 597 F.2D 702 (10TH CIR. 1979); SEE ALSO STATE EX REL. MURPHY V. BOUDREAU, 652 P.2D 531 (OKLA. 1982); AND SMITH V. STATE, 626 P.2D 1357 (OKLA. CRIM. APP. 1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 1987
SETTLES V. BOARD OF ED. OF DEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. … IN SO RULING, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RELIED ON THE STATE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN STATE V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1999
As the United States Supreme Court held in Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. … peakers will be provided up to five minutes to express their issue, although the Chair has the authority to reduce or extend this timeframe." ¶ 7 As the United States Supreme Court recognized in Perry Education Association v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 2010
Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat'l Corp. , 614 P.2d 576 , 579 (Okla. 1980). … In Excise Board v. Lowden , 116 P.2d 700 , 702 (Okla. 1941), the court, quoting State ex rel. Ledbetter v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 2002
The recognition that the United States Constitution does not grant such a right is based on the United States Supreme Court's holding in Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. … Haworth Bd. of Educ. v. Havens, 637 P.2d 902 , 904 (Okla.Ct.App. 1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 6, 1996
TXO Production v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission, 829 P.2d 964 , 968-69 (Okla. 1992). … The entire act, when read as a whole in light of Midwest City v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna