Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.70s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1991
IN OKLAHOMA CITY V. … WHILE THE POSITION OF SECRETARY/BAILIFF SATISFIES THE FIRST TWO ELEMENTS OF A PUBLIC OFFICE IN OKLAHOMA CITY V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1971
In this regard, see New York State Labor Relations Board v. Interborough News Company, 10 N.Y.S.2d 396 , 170 Misc. 347 . … N.L.R.B. v. Epstein, C.A. 3, 203 F.2d 482 , cert. den. Epstein v. N.L.R.B., 74 S.Ct. 474 , 347 U.S. 912 , 98 L.Ed. 1068 ; N.L.R.B. v. Jackson Press, Inc., C.A. 7, 201 F.2d 541 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 1996
State v. … See, e.g., Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors v. Guardian Funeral Home, 429 P.2d 732 , 733 (Okla. 1967).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1969
under consideration your letter in which you ask for: ". . . an opinion concerning the split sentence, that we may have some guidance as to the appropriate time to docket for clemency consideration by the Pardon and Parole Board … Wiley v. State, Okl. Cr., 349 P.2d 30 (1960); Campbell v. State, Okl. Cr., 287 P.2d 713 (1955); Stevens v. State Okl. Cr., 274 P.2d 402 (1954); Slaughter v. State, 94 Okl. Cr. 407 , 236 P.2d 993 (1951); and others.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 1996
Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 , 1364 (Okla. 1978). … See White v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 26, 2007
Taylor v. State Farm Fire Cas. Co. , 981 P.2d 1253 , 1261 (Okla. 1999) (footnote omitted). … Thompson v. Hickey , 8 Abb. N. Cas. 159, 166 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. 1880) (holding that a family burial lot in which an interment has been made cannot be mortgaged).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1985
Even upon reaching the age of sixty (60), the member may apply to the OLERS Board and continue his or her duties. 47 O.S. 2 -305 (A) (1984). … Mayberry v. Coyne , supra; Mulvey v. Waldo , 140 N.Y.S. 988 (1912); see also, United States v. Teller , 107 U.S. 64 , 2 S.Ct. 39 , 27 L.Ed. 352 (1883).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 2008
other political subdivision of the state, any public trust, any public entity specifically created by the statutes of the State of Oklahoma or as a result of statutory authorization therefor, and any department, agency, board … In the absence of an express definition of the common words used in a statute, the words must be given their plain and ordinary meaning. 25 O.S. 2001 , § 1[ 25-1 ]; City of Durant v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 9, 1995
Clifton v. Clifton, 801 P.2d 693 (Okla. 1990). … The basic principle concerning the power of an administrative board to adopt rules and regulations is that the "agency making same be fully authorized to do so either by statutory provision or by implication." W.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1991
SEE, ALLEN V. STATE. 803 P.2D 1164 (OKL.CR.1990); BRADY V. … THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS RULED RATHER DEFINITIVELY ON THE REQUIRED PROCEDURE TO TERMINATE A CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE IN CLEVELAND BOARD OF EDUCATION V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1978
(Emphasis added) As noted in the case of Dependent School District No. 13 v. … Matheson, State Representative: "A school board may issue school bonds for a more specific purpose or project than those enumerated in Article X, Section 26 of the Constitution, provided the specific purpose falls within
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 1979
Re Redwine's Estate, Okla., 445 P.2d 275 (1968); McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okla., 442 P.2d 297 (1968). … Special Indemnity Fund v. Harold, Okla., 398 P.2d 827 (1964); Ridley Packing Company v. Holliday, Okla., 467 P.2d 480 (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 2, 1973
In Peterson v. … In the Oklahoma case of Custer County Excise Board v. St.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1973
Applying the plain meaning rule of McVicker v. … Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968), wherein the Court stated: "All courts recognize that if the wording of a provision of a statute or constitution is plain, clear and unambiguous, its evident
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 21, 1996
of Article V, § 33. … (Emphasis added.) ¶ 15 This definition of "revenue bill" was reaffirmed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Board of County Commissioners v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 2009
The employee has not had a due process hearing as required by Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill , 470 U.S. 532 (1985), or a name-clearing hearing under the requirements of Melton v. … The employee has not had a due process hearing as required by Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill , 470 U.S. 532 (1985), or a name-clearing hearing under the requirements of Melton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1968
The said opinion also overruled an opinion dated September 13, 1963, addressed to you as Director of the Oklahoma State Personnel Board concerning a classified employee signing a referendum petition; it also overruled, insofar … Among the cases discussed in previous opinions and mentioned by you in your letter are the following: State v. City of Cleveland, 33 Abs 557 , 33 N.E.2d 35 (1940), and Heidtman v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1971
Thus, in Sheldon v. … State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 15, 1974
Gragg v. Dudley, 289 P. 254 , 143 Okl. 280 (1930). The Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma in Reddell v. State, 170 P. 273 , 14 Okl. … McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (Okl., 1968). The Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Miller Construction Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 2006
Johnson v. Woodward, 38 P.3d 218 , 222 (Okla. 2001). "The best evidence of legislative intent is the statutory language itself." Id. (quoting Upton v. State Dep't of Corr., 9 P.3d 84 , 86 (Okla. 2000)). … We found that the discussion of collective bargaining matters by local boards of educations were open to the public. Id. at 234-35.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna