Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.42s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976
Sekt v. … (citing authority) Spearman v. Williams, 415 P.2d 557 , 600 (Okl. 1966). Ruble v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 1972
The United States Supreme Court decision of Dunn v. Blumstein, No. 70-13, decided March 21, 1972, arose from an interpretation of the Tennessee durational residency requirements for voter qualifications. … The Secretary of each county election board is herewith given authority to register electors and transfer or reinstate their registration at any place within the county at any time except on Sundays, legal holidays, election
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 14, 1979
Bramlett v. District Court of Marshall County, Okla. 557 P.2d 424 (1976); White Stag Manufacturing Company v. Mace, Okla. 556 P.2d 997 (1976). … Board of Commissioners of McIntosh County, 31 Okla. 636 , 122 P.168 (1912).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976
In the case of Draper v. Phelps, D.C. Okl., 351 F. … As to whether the Legislature may constitutionally set minimum age requirements and educational requirements, your attention is invited to the case of Johnson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1999
, district, school district, fair board, court, executive office, advisory group, task force, study group, or any subdivision thereof, supported in whole or in part by public funds or entrusted with the expenditure of public … In Merrill v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 14, 1979
Bramlett v. District Court of Marshall County, Okl. 557 P.2d 424 (1976); White Stag Manufacturing Company v. Mace, Okl. 556 P.2d 997 (1976). … Board of Commissioners of McIntosh County, 31 Okl. 636 , 122 P. 168 (1912).
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: The Honorable Steve Kunzweiler, District Attorney, District 14
2015 OK AG 4 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 2015
F.O.P., Lodge No. 188 v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa Co. Discussed at Length 1951 OK 262, 236 P.2d 987, 205 Okla. 233, JOHNSTON v. … CONNER Discussed at Length 1998 OK 44, 959 P.2d 979, 69 OBJ 2025, TULSA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S F.O.P. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Discussed at Length 1983 OK 101, 675 P.2d 432, Hillcrest Medical Center v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 1968
The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma interpreted the foregoing section in the case of County Board of Equalization, Pittsburg County, vs. … The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma in Pioneer Telephone and Telegraph Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 1975
See e.g., People v. Salas, 7 Cal.3d 812 , 820-24 . … Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County v. Mars, Sheriff, 189 Okl. 339 , 117 P.2d 129 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 2004
Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287 , 295 (1942) (quoting Milwaukee County v. M.E. White Co., 296 U.S. 268 , 276-77 (1935)). … Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 301 P.2d 212 , 216 (Okla. 1956).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1980
Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 422 P.2d 840 (Okl. 1966). … the association and shall be entitled to receive from the association within three years after his ceasing to be a member the value of his membership interest in the association subject to the conclusive appraisal by the Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 2002
DREW EDMONDSON Attorney General of Oklahoma DOROTHY BROWN Assistant Attorney General 1 The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Callender v. … Bowen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 1975
of way and such crossing and in case any railroad company or corporation fails so to construct and maintain said crossing for thirty days after written notice by the road overseer of any road district or the council or board … Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 1996
State v. … See, e.g., Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors v. Guardian Funeral Home, 429 P.2d 732 , 733 (Okla. 1967).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 8, 2005
Farmers Home Admin. v. … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1975
Absent specific legislation, the Personnel Board may establish job qualifications for positions under the Merit System pursuant to 74 O.S. 805 [74-805] (1971). … Co. v. Cooksey, Okl., 285 P.2d 223 (1955). Since objective qualifications are not subject to evaluation, Section 831F can only apply to qualifications that require subjective evaluation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1980
Relative to your second question, the decision of the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Gray v. Board of Education of Pawhuska Independent School District, Okl. 389 P.2d 498 (1964) is determinative.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1977
In Broadrick v. … activity by classified state employees, did not violate the First Amendment rights of such employees in view of the fact that such statute could be construed, and was in fact construed previously by the State Personnel Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1971
See State Board v. Youngs Market Co., 299 U.S. 59 81 L.Ed. 38 , 57 S.Ct. 77 ; Joseph S. Finch Co. v. McKittrick, 305 U.S. 395 , 83 L.Ed. 246 , 59 S.Ct. 256 ; and Indianapolis Brewing Co. v. … An analogous question was answered by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Wood Co. v. Russel, 102 Okl. 92 , 226 P. 1040 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 20, 1978
In Stewart Machine Company v. … Oklahoma Tax Commission, 294 P.2d 809 (1956); and Bailey v. State Board of Public Affairs, 194 Okl. 495 , 153 P.2d 235 (1944).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna