Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.48s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1990
V. FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. OF OKLAHOMA CITY, 525 P.2D 644 (OKLA. 1974). WORDS MAY EVEN BE ALTERED, MODIFIED OR SUPPLIED IN ORDER TO GIVE A STATUTE THE MEANING INTENDED. WRAY V. … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, 442 P.2D 309 (OKLA. 1968). IT IS ALSO PROPER TO RESORT TO THE HISTORY OF THE MEASURE IN DETERMINING ITS MEANING. STATE EX REL. RUCKER V. TAPP, 380 P.2D 260 (OKLA. 1963).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1978
The only other executive sessions authorized by 25 O.S. 307 [ 25-307 ] relate to district boards of education and are not applicable to the Tax Commission. … Special Indemnity Fund, 538 P.2d 590 (1975); Stockton v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 205 Okl. 6 , 235 P.2d 286 (1951); Campbell v. Cornish, 163 Okl. 213 , 22 P.2d 63 (1933); and Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1970
In Searcy et al. v. State ex rel. … In the case of Board of Trustees of the Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 14, 1979
See Article XVII , Section 3(a), Oklahoma Constitution; City of Tulsa v. Johnson, 145 P.2d 198 (Okla. 1943); Ramsey v. Leeper, 31 P.2d 852 (Okla. 1934). … See Ramsey v. Leeper, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1996
Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16 of Payne County, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). … These individuals would include certain members of the Board of Corrections and even the Attorney General. ¶ 7 The Governor, through an executive order creating a cabinet secretary position cannot supersede the plain intent
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: The Honorable Dana Prieto, Oklahoma State Senate, District 34
2024 OK AG 6 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 2024
COM'RS Discussed at Length 1924 OK 396 , 231 P. 250 , 104 Okla. 260 , BOARD OF COM'RS OF TULSA COUNTY v. NEWS-DISPATCH PRINT Discussed 2010 OK 5 , 237 P.3d 134 , ESTATE OF CROWELL v. … F.O.P., Lodge No. 188 v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa Co. Discussed at Length 1982 OK 133 , 658 P.2d 464 , Summey v. Tisdale Discussed at Length 1951 OK 262 , 236 P.2d 987 , 205 Okla. 233 , JOHNSTON v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1969
Also in the case of Baker v. … (Emphasis added) In the case of Rhea v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1978
Street v. … Case v. Pinnick, 186 Okl. 217 , 97 P.2d 58 (1939)." The Court had previously stated in AMF Tubescope Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1971
In Gray v. … Case Plow Works v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1973
Under the rule of construction of statutes in McVicker v. … Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968), the following was stated: "All courts recognize that if the wording of a provision of a statute or constitution is plain, clear and unambiguous, its evident
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 1970
In the case of Cummings, et al. v. … Board of Education, Oklahoma City, 190 Okl. 533 , 125 P.2d 989 (1942) the Supreme Court of Oklahoma held in paragraph three of its syllabus: "A pecuniary liability created by statute operating as a punishment to a wrongdoer
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 4, 1974
See U.S. v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 (1940). … In the case of U.S. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1979
As recognized in Nucholls v. … Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, Okla., 560 P.2d 556 (1976) the validity of zoning regulations may not exceed the power delegated by statute and such use of excessive power is invalid and void.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 1988
In Herndon v. … . ¶ 7 Also pertinent to our inquiry although not conclusive is the case of Pawnee County Excise Board v. Kurn, 101 P.2d 614 (Okla. 1940), interpreting and applying Article X , Section 20 , of the Oklahoma Constitution.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: Rollo D. Redburn, Executive Director, Oklahoma Lottery Commission
2017 OK AG 2 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 4, 2017
Draper v. … Powers Restaurants, Inc. v. Garrison , 1970 OK 30, ¶8 , 465 P.2d 761, 764 ; see also Burkhardt v.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1970
In Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. … In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1989
V. NIGH, 640 P.2D 230, 235 (OKLA. 1982). … V. NIGH, 642 P.2D 230, 235 (OKLA. 1982) AND STATE EX REL. WILLIAMSON V. COMMISSIONERS OF THE LAND OFFICE, 301 P.2D 655, 659 (OKLA. 1956). IN STATE EX REL. WILLIAMSON V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 1997
Hill v. Board of Education, 944 P.2d 930 , 931 (Okla. 1997). … See, e.g., Village of Pleasant City v. Division of Reclamation, 617 N.E.2d 1103 , 1105 (Ohio 1993); Town of Norfolk v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 22, 1976
In applying this same standard of statutory construction, the Oklahoma Supreme Court stated in the case of Ramsey v. … In the case of James v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1976
other political subdivision of the state, any public trust, any public entity specifically created by the statutes of the State of Oklahoma or as a result of statutory authorization therefor, and any department, agency, board … Equipment was defined by the Court in Acacia Oil Gas Co. v. Tidal Oil Co., 91 Okl. 237 , 217 P. 372 : "The word 'equipment' is a very broad and general term, . . .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna