Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.91s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 8, 2003
For example, in Eaves v. … Satepeahtaw v. State, 595 P.2d 805 , 808 (Okla. Crim 1979).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 1996
To similar effect, see Decker v. … As to bonds issued by the board of education such bonds must be approved by election of the school district upon the question of issuing such bonds; 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1969
official and having completed six (6) years or more of credited service as an elected state official and having paid to the Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System sufficient contributions which shall be determined by the Board … An Oklahoma case, Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Okl. 349 P.2d 646 (1960), in quoting from another Oklahoma case, King v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 13, 1971
When a Commission is created by statute, its powers are limited to those granted by the applicable statute, which may not be enlarged by the Board itself. Boydston v. State, 277 P.2d 138 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1970
[ 20-1304 ] (1969), provides in part: "Claims against the Court Fund shall include only such expenses as may be lawfully incurred incident to the operation of the court in said county, and are approved by the governing board … See Bateman v. Michigan Public School Em. Retirement Fund Bd., 333 Mich. 264 , 52 N.W.2d 693 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 12, 1971
transferred and (2) the total amount appropriated or that should have been appropriated for transfer fees by the district from which the pupils are transferred, in accordance with an attendance report filed with the State Board … The words in any statute, in common use, are to be taken in their plain, obvious and ordinary signification in accordance with their ordinary meaning, Carter v. Phillips, 88 Okl. 202 , 212 P. 747 (1923).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1968
In Norris v. … In State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 10, 1975
Vested right is defined in Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … 52, Article V, Section 54 ."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 1990
THIS STATUTE SPECIFICALLY APPLIES TO BOARDS OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS. UNDER THIS STATUTE, THE METHOD OF CALCULATING THE LEVY FOR THE SINKING FUND TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL ON THE BOND ISSUE IS QUITE CLEAR. … GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY V. STATE 645 P.2D 1011, 1019 (1982). THESE TWO STATUTES ARE BOTH APPLICABLE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUES AND ARE NOT INCONSISTENT WITH ONE ANOTHER.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1970
In Elder v. … In McLean v. State, 95 Okl.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1968
In City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R. … And the enumeration of specific powers operates to exclude those not enumerated. citation" In Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1975
House Bill 738, 1965 Session Laws, further provided at Section 2 thereof for the creation of a Lake Area Planning and Zoning Commission by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of any county authorized to so create … Becknell v. State Industrial Court, 512 P.2d 1180 (Okl. 1973). Also, as a general rule of statutory construction, a legislative act should be construed as a whole. Donelson v. Oldfield, 488 P.2d 1269 (Okl. 1971).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 7, 1976
In Harrison v. … Slater v. Fire and Police Board of Denver, Col., 96 P. 554 (1908), is nearly identical on the facts and law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1974
for the appropriate discharge of the duty herein imposed; (8) return to the Oklahoma State Reformatory all parolees who have violated the terms and conditions of any parole granted, however, the State Pardon and Parole Board … State v. Grant, 102 N.J. Super. 164 , 245 A.2d 528 , 430 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1974
McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1969
personnel is 73 O.S. 163 [ 73-163 ] (1961), which provides: "In order to prevent any defaults or threatened defaults in the payment of said bonds, the Authority is hereby authorized and empowered, in cooperation with the State Board … (Emphasis added) Spiers v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1968
"(c) Any advisory board contract, or any similar contract, agreement or understanding, offering, providing for or promising any special profits. … The Pennsylvania court, in McDowell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1968
In the case of Hawks, et aL, v. … Board of Edu., 171 N.Y. 263 , 63 N.E. 1107 ." To the same effect, see the cases of Carter, State Auditor, v. Thomas, 172 Okl. 558 , 46 P.2d 460 ; Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368 , 56 P.2d 136 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 1973
Dowell v. Board of Education, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 1939 ). … Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Fortinberry Co., Inc., 207 P.2d 301 (Okl. 1949); City of Wilburton v. King, 162 Okl. 32 , 18 P.2d 1075 (1933).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1979
Hillcrest Hospital v. State Industrial Court 452 P.2d 781 (Okl. 1969), syllabus 3. … Clark v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna