Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
0.86s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1974
In Oklahoma City v. … See also Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, Okl., 116 P.2d 700 (1941) which states: "The legislature may make the title to an act as restrictive as it pleases and courts cannot enlarge the scope of the title."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 1980
Title 19 O.S. 901 .19 [ 19-901.19 ] (1979), provides in pertinent part: "The board shall also levy an annual assessment sufficient to care for the cost of operation of the district and the maintenance of the fire department … A similar question was addressed in Armstrong v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 21, 1980
First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings Loan Board, Okla. 569 P.2d 993 (1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 15, 1972
Tate v. Logan, Okl., 362 P.2d 670 ; Allen v. Burkhart, Okl., 377 P.2d 821 ; Gates v. Easter, Okl., 354 P.2d 438 , 441." … See Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank Trust Co., supra; Bradford v. Schmucker, 135 F.2d 991 , 996 (1943); Velazquez v. Thompson, 451 F.2d 202 , 205 (2d Cir. 1971); Holt v. Brown, 336 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: John D. Harrington, Chairman, Statewide Virtual Charter School Board
2015 OK AG 11 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 2015
The Legislature Intended the Board to be an Entity Separate and Apart From the State Department of Education ¶4 In construing any statute, we must first ascertain and give effect to legislative intent. YDF, Inc. v. … Citationizer: Table of Authority Cite Name Level Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 2006 OK 32 , 136 P.3d 656 , YDF, INC. v. SCHLUMAR, INC. Discussed Title 59.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1979
Department of Education, may be summarized as stating the following: By reason of decisions by the United States Supreme Court in Geduldig v. … Aiello and National League of Cities v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 1999
Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 , 104 (1976). … Kratz, 905 P.2d 753 , 755 (Okla. 1995), and, intent is ascertained from the whole act, City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations Board, 904 P.2d 604 , 609 (Okla. 1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1995
See Wood v. Independent School District No. 141 of Pottawatomie Co., 661 P.2d 892 (Okla. 1983). … TWA v. McKinley, 749 P.2d 108 , 110 (Okla. 1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1971
(Emphasis added) Statutes governing Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund should be liberally construed in favor of firemen, City of Ardmore ex rel Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment, Okl., 467 P.2d 502 , (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1977
Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge, 156 P.2d 340 . In Oklahoma County v. … The above reasoning was followed in the case of Gibson v. Phillips University, 195 Okl. 456 , 158 P.2d 901 (1945). See also: Board of Equalization v. Tulsa Pythian Benevolent Association, 195 Okl. 458 , 158 P.2d 904 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1994
ARTICLE V , SECTION 1 . THEREUNDER, THE AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE EXTENDS TO ALL RIGHTFUL SUBJECTS OF LEGISLATION NOT WITHDRAWN BY THE CONSTITUTION OR IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. OBBS V. … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, 257 P.2D 802 (OKLA.1955). WHATEVER THE LEGISLATURE MAY DO BY STATUTE, IT MAY MODIFY BY STATUTE. COLPITT V. HERRINGTON, 519 P.2D 553 (OKLA.1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1979
London Square Village v. Okla. County Equalization and Excise Board, 559 P.2d 1224 (1977); Dairy Queen of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 205 Okl. 473 , 238 P.2d 800 (1951); Board of Equalization v. … Howard v. Manning, 79 Okl. 165 , 192 P. 358 , 12 A.L.R. 819 (1920); Sublett v. City of Tulsa, 405 P.2d 185 , 200 (Okl. 1965).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1979
Const. art. 6 11 , Wright v. State, 137 P.2d 796 (Okla. 1943). … In Alfalfa Electric Coop., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1994
ARTICLE V , SECTION 1 . THEREUNDER, THE AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE EXTENDS TO ALL RIGHTFUL SUBJECTS OF LEGISLATION NOT WITHDRAWN BY THE CONSTITUTION OR IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. DOBBS V. … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, 257 P.2D 802 (OKLA.1955). WHATEVER THE LEGISLATURE MAY DO BY STATUTE, IT MAY MODIFY BY STATUTE. COLPITT V. HERRINGTON, 519 P.2D 553 (OKLA.1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 12, 2004
Williamson v. Comm'rs of the Land Office, 301 P.2d 655 , 659 (Okla. 1956). … Ass'n v. Nigh, 642 P.2d 230 , 235-36 (Okla. 1982). 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1986
Grand Jury of McCurtain County v. Pate , 572 P.2d 226 (Okla. 1977); Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Heublein Wines, Int'l ., 566 P.2d 1158 (Okla. 1977); Draper v. … See also, cf., Wiseman v. Boren , 545 P.2d 753 , 761 (Okla. 1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 4, 1993
LEAVE ENTITLES A MEMBER TO AN ADDITIONAL YEAR OR FRACTION THEREOF OF SERVICE CREDIT, THE MEMBER'S EMPLOYER SHALL REIMBURSE THE SYSTEM FOR THE COST OF FUNDING THE ADDITIONAL RESERVE BY PAYING THE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE BOARD … CARTWRIGHT V. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP., 663 P.2D 718 (OKLA.1982).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1973
The general rule in construing legislative enactments is found in Special Indemnity Fund v. … Also in McVicker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1976
Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, Okl., 509 P.2d 666 , 668 (1973). Thus, the number of days that school is to be in session and instruction offered is mandatory. … General Motors Corporation, Argonaut Division v. Cook, Okl., 528 P.2d 1110 , 1114 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 10, 1977
736 .1 [ 59-736.1 ] will not be set out in full in this opinion since the Attorney General has recently rendered his Opinion No. 76-239 which held, pursuant to the United States Supreme Court decision in Virginia State Board … of Pharmacy, et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna