Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,251 results
1.80s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 13, 1994
Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtin County, 698 P.2d 930 , 932 (Okla. 1985). Where the intent of the legislature iS plainly expressed in the statute, it must be followed without further inquiry or statutory construction. … Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan, 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982). Also, it is presumed that the legislature, in the statute, said what it meant and meant what it said. Darnell v. Chrysler Corp., 687 P.2d 132 (Okla. 1984).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 26, 1972
McVicker v. … Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 (1968), held: "If wording of provision of statute or constitution is plain, clear and unambiguous, its evident meaning must be accepted and there is no reason
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 1979
See Johnson v. State Election Board, 197 Okl. 211 , 167 P.2d 891 (1946). It is, therefore, the official opinion of the Attorney General that your question should be answered as follows: In light of Okla. Const.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1980
In Home-Stake Production Co. v. … The Board of Equalization, Okl., 416 P.2d 917 (1966), the Court said: "The law is settled that no claim of tax exemption can be sustained unless it is shown same clearly comes within the provisions of the law under which
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1968
Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co., Okl., 421 P.2d 244 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 2007
Telle v. Carter , 39 P.2d 134 , 137 (Okla. 1934). … Matlack v. Oklahoma City , 134 P. 58 , 59 (Okla. 1913).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1969
(b) a resolution is the mere expression of an opinion and not an enactment of law:" This writer is aware that the case of Board of Commissioners of Marshall County v. … Shaw, 199 Okl. 66 , 182 P.2d 507 (1947), overruled in part Hawks v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuestion Submitted by: The Honorable Ron Justice, State Senator, District 23
2014 OK AG 15 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 31, 2014
BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF GARFIELD COUNTY Discussed at Length 1972 OK 98, 498 P.2d 1395, SHIPP v. SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA INDUSTRIES AUTH. Discussed 1943 OK 270, 140 P.2d 740, 193 Okla. 1, BLACK v. … BOARD OF COM'RS OF HARMON COUNTY v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMM'N Discussed Title 19.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 4, 1974
No Commissioner or other officer of any Urban Renewal Authority, Board or Commission exercising the powers pursuant to this Act shall hold any other public office under the incorporated city other than his commissionership … Following the general rule of statutory construction as contained in Schroeder v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 2000
.) ¶ 4 In Shotts v. … . ¶ 5 In making its decision the Court relied on Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Warram, 285 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1955).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1970
However, in Elias v. City of Tulsa, Okl. 408 P.2d 517 (1965), the Supreme Court held: ". . . that Chapter 19Aa, S.L. 1955, 19 O.S. Supp. 1955, 863.1-863.43, [ 19-863.1 ] — [ 19-863.43 ] is unconstitutional." … O.S. 866 .2 [ 19-866.2 ] was amended by the addition of the following paragraph: "In the counties in which a Lake Area Planning and Zoning Commission is authorized as provided above, said commission may be created by the Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1974
Hawks v. Bland, 155 Okl. 178 , 9 P.2d 720 . … Rector v. State, (1972), 495 P.2d 826 , citing Newman v. State, ex rel. Board of Regents, (1971), 490 P.2d 1079 . We do not now find that the judiciary should abolish the doctrine."
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 2005
Trust Co. v. … Boice v. State, 473 P.2d 241 , 245 (Okla. 1970).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1988
THE FUND SHALL BE NONFISCAL AND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED IN COMPUTING ANY LEVY WHEN THE MUNICIPALITY MAKES ITS ESTIMATE TO THE EXCISE BOARD FOR NEEDED APPROPRIATIONS. … I-30 OF ADAIR COUNTY V. BLAIR, 613 P.2D 1046 (OKLA. 1980).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1979
Const. art. 6 11 , Wright v. State, 137 P.2d 796 (Okla. 1943). … In Alfalfa Electric Coop., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1968
People v. Olson, 42 Cal.Rptr. 760 , 764 , 765 , 232 C.A.2d 480 ; Mathews v. Pyle, 251 P.2d 893 , 895 , 896 , 75 Ariz. 76 ; State ex rel. Kavanaugh v. Henderson, 169 S.W.2d 389 , 392 , 350 Mo. 9 68 ; Griffiths v. … In this regard see Lingo-Leeper Lumber Co. v. Carter, 161 Okl. S, 17 P.2d 365 (1932).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1979
Ridley Packing Co. v. Holliday, 467 P.2d 480 (Okl. 1970). … Nucholls v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 560 P.2d 556 (Okl. 1977). Thus when referring to "facilities", one must refer to a class of property, real, personal, and intangible.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 24, 1979
In Shea v. Shea, Okla., 537 P.2d 417 (1975), the Court held that the word "may" usually is employed to imply permissive or discretional, and not mandatory action or conduct. … Moreover, Section 8(b) of the Act provides in pertinent part as follows: "In lieu of the travel reimbursement or monthly travel allowance as provided by law, the board of county commissioners, with concurrence of the county
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 24, 1976
In Re W 339 New York Supp. 2d 193, 195 (1972) "Advertise means 'to give public notice of; to announce publicly . . . to call public attention to . . . an invitation to the general public.' " Sassone v. … Board of Chiropractic Examiners 20 Cal Reporter 231, 235 (1962). "To advertise is to give notice to; to inform; to make known to." Bissell Carpet Sweeper Company v. Masters Mail Order Company of Washington, D.C., 140 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 18, 1980
Tate v. Logan, Okl., 362 P.2d 670 (1961). … Bloom v. Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychology, et al., 492 S.W.2d 460 (1973). In Taylor v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna