Case law

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Scott M. Inman, State Representative, District 94

2014 OK AG 7 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 2014

As such, Article V, Section 56 of the Oklahoma Constitution requires that it contain only appropriative provisions. Id. ; see also Fent v. State ex rel. … Id. ; see Tulsa Stockyards, Inc. v.

Opinion No. 72-277 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1972

Applying the plain meaning construction rule as expressed in McVicker v. … Board of County Commissioners of the County of Caddo, 442 P.2d 297 , 1968 , wherein the Court stated: "All courts recognize that if the wording of a provision of a statute or constitution is plain, clear and unambiguous,

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 2009

Hampton v. … Reardon v.

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 30, 1986

The board of county commissioners, in an open meeting, shall open the sealed bids and compare them to the state contract price. … The board of county commissioners shall select the lowest and best bid within thirty (30) days ." (Emphasis added). The language quoted above is simple, plain and free of ambiguity.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 29, 2001

See Satepeahtaw v. State, 595 P.2d 805 , 806 (Okla.Crim. 1979) (characterizing housing authority's officials' diversion of housing authority monies as embezzlement of State funds). … Auth. v. Craytor, 600 P.2d 314 , 316 (Okla. 1979). Therefore, in matters of State property and the powers of State agencies, State law, rather than tribal law, controls.

Opinion No. 69-195 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1969

(b) a resolution is the mere expression of an opinion and not an enactment of law:" This writer is aware that the case of Board of Commissioners of Marshall County v. … Shaw, 199 Okl. 66 , 182 P.2d 507 (1947), overruled in part Hawks v.

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1988

BOARDS, BUREAUS, COMMISSIONS, AGENCIES, TRUSTEESHIPS, AUTHORITIES, COUNCILS, COMMITTEES, PUBLIC TRUSTS, TASK FORCES OR STUDY GROUPS" IN THE STATE "SUPPORTED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY PUBLIC FUNDS OR ENTRUSTED WITH THE EXPENDING … SANDERS V. BENTON, 579 P. 2D 815 (OKLA. 1978).

Opinion No. (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1980

City of Midwest City v. Harris, Okl. 561 P.2d 1357 (1977). … The business address of a licensee is referred to in 59 O.S. 1563 [ 59-1563 ], which requires the licensee to notify the Board of the place where he engages in the fitting and sale of hearing aids.

Opinion No. (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1993

STATE AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS HAVE SUCH POWERS AS ARE CONFERRED UPON THEM BY LAW AND SUCH AS MAY BE FAIRLY IMPLIED FROM THE STATUTE GRANTING EXPRESS POWERS. MARLEY V. CANNON, 618 P.2D 401 (OKLA.1980). … HOWEVER, AN AGENCY, BOARD OR COMMISSION HAS NO AUTHORITY TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY OR FUNCTIONS WHICH MAY BE EXERCISED ONLY BY THE STATE ENTITY. ANDERSON V. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, 446 P.2D 814 (OKLA.1968).

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 3, 2001

United States v. Colahan, 811 F.2d 287 , 294 (6th Cir. 1987). … Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 667-68 (Okla. 1973); Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980); In re State Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 206 P.2d 211 , 215 (Okla. 1949). 4 IV.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 2005

Trust Co. v. … Boice v. State, 473 P.2d 241 , 245 (Okla. 1970).

Opinion No. 73-115 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 1973

Morgan v. Commissioner, 309 U.S. 78 , 84 L.Ed. 585 , 60 S.Ct. 424 1940 ; United States v. American Trucking Assoc., 310 U.S. 634 , 84 L.Ed. 1345 , 60 S.Ct. 1059 1940 ; Trosk v. … Board of Elections, 262 N.Y. 430 , 187 N.E. 566 1933 ). The Supreme Court of Oklahoma has similarly stated (Peterson v.

Opinion No. 74-272 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1975

This general rule has been followed in Oklahoma as set forth in Goodin v. … See also Allen v. Burkhart, 377 P.2d 821 (1963).

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 1979

In Austin, Nichols Co. v. … Oklahoma County Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, 578 P.2d 1200 (Okla. 1978), the Court was confronted with the following stipulated facts: Each corporate taxpayer was headquartered in New York and shipped its manufactured goods

Opinion No. 77-263 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1978

It should further be recognized that your question also may extend to commercial enterprises that provide tutorial assistance, give review courses, and offer courses to assist in preparation for college board, medical board … , law board, and other standardized tests.

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 13, 2007

Telle v. Carter , 39 P.2d 134 , 137 (Okla. 1934). … Matlack v. Oklahoma City , 134 P. 58 , 59 (Okla. 1913).

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Wade Roussellot, State Representative, District 12

2014 OK AG 5 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 2014

Sys. v. … Morgan v.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Shelton, State Representative, District 97

2014 OK AG 4 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 2014

YDF, Inc. v. … Sys. v.

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1979

Ridley Packing Co. v. Holliday, 467 P.2d 480 (Okl. 1970). … Nucholls v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 560 P.2d 556 (Okl. 1977). Thus when referring to "facilities", one must refer to a class of property, real, personal, and intangible.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 2000

.) ¶ 4 In Shotts v. … . ¶ 5 In making its decision the Court relied on Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Warram, 285 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1955).