Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.60s
Board of Com'rs v. State Industrial Commission
184 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1938
Brown testified on both hearings. On the first hearing his statement was made of record by agreement. … Barnes Drilling Co. v. West, supra; Texas Co. v. Roberts, 146 Okla. 140 , 294 P. 180 ; Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 P. 785 ; Fain Drilling Co. v. Deatherage, 179 Okla. 409 , 65 P.2d 1212 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Comrs. Grant Co. v. McKinley
8 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899
In Van Trees v. Territory, 7 Okla. 353, 54 Pac. 495 , Mr. … (Story, Const. 1768; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 Wall, 532; Light v. Bank, 2 Okla. 543, 37 Pac. 1075 .”)
Cited 4 timesPublishedMcMaster Construction, Inc. v. Board of Regents
68 O.B.A.J. 790 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1997
Brown, 422 N.E.2d 1254 (Ind.Ct.App.1981); Attlin Construction, Inc. v. Muncie Community Schools, 413 N.E.2d 281 (Ind.Ct.App.1980); Krohnberg v. Pass, 187 Minn. 73 , 244 N.W. 329 (1932); Malloy v. … Boyertown Area School Board, 540 Pa. 308 , 657 A.2d 915 (1995); Mongiovi v. Doemer, 24 Or.App. 639 , 546 P.2d 1110 (1976); Gulf Bitulithic Co. v. Nueces County, 11 S.W.2d 305 (Tex.Ct.App.1928); City of Houston v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCarroll, Brough Robinson v. Board of Commissioners
64 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1917
of said board, before the taxes were paid. … In re Appeal of Eranklin Hickman, 63 Okla. 14 , 162 Pac. 176 ; Weatherly v. Cloworth Development Company, 63 Okla. 397 , 166 Pac. 156 ; Weatherly v. Sawyer, 63 Okla. 155 , 163 Pac. 717 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedAcres v. Excise Board of Muskogee County
149 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1931
One of the leading cases on the first contention is Perrine v. Bonaparte, Co. … Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Seely
621 P.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1980
This Court does not disagree with the Board’s first broad contention that conducting a liquor-related business is a privilege granted by the State. In Brown Distributing Co. v. … State v. Parham, 412 P.2d 142, 147 (Okl.1966).
Cited 12 timesPublishedBrasier v. State Board of Barber Examiners
193 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1943
On December 3, 1940, we held this rule to be valid in Schwarze v. Clark, 188 Okla. 217 , 107 P. 2d 1018 . … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. OSBORN, WELCH, and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEdelmann v. Board of Com'rs, Leflore Co.
110 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1925
Held, the contract is null and void,” —following the cases of the Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Co-Operative Publishing Co., 104 Okla. 262 , 231 Pac. 251 ; Board of County Com’rs of Tulsa County v. … . & Audit Company, 104 Okla. 260 , 231 Pac. 250 ; Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Tulsa Camera Record Co., 103 Okla. 35 . 228 Pac. 1103 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Burris
626 P.2d 1316 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1980
Department of Transportation v. Pile, 603 P.2d 337 (Okl.1979); Pittsburg Press v. Pittsburg Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 , 93 S.Ct. 2553 , 37 L.Ed.2d 669 (1973). 3 . Brown Distributing Company v. … Also see Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedWilson v. State ex rel. State Election Board
270 P.3d 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 2012
In his petition in the present case filed against the State Election Board and its secretary, Senator Wilson makes verbatim the same allegations as he did in Wilson I. … under Reynolds v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedRyburn v. Board of Pharmacy of State
354 P.2d 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1960
Porch v. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and BLACKBIRD and BERRY, JJ., concur. IRWIN, J., concurs in result. JACKSON, J., dissents.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWallace v. Excise Board of Bryan County
91 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1923
See Goree et al. v. Cahill et al., 35 Okla. 42 , 128 Pac. 124 ; 15 Cyc. 343; Johnston v. Robertson, 8 Ariz. 361 , 76 Pac. 465 ; Walker et al. v. Sanford, etc., 78 Ga. 165 , 1 S. … Best v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedNull v. Board of Com'rs., Latimer Co.
98 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1924
Stat. 1921, provides as follows: “Any survey made by the county surveyor, under the order of the board of county commissioners, in laying out any road or highway along any section or subdivision line of a section, if not … Tholl v. Koles, 65 Kan. 802 , 70 Pac. 881 ; Mills v. Glasscock, 26 Okla. 123 , 110 Pac. 377 . 4.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners
183 Okla. 527 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1938
The parties to this cause have stipulated that the point at issue here is the same as that decided in Herrin et al. v. … BAXLESS, V. C. J., and PHELPS, J., absent.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAlbright v. Election Board of Payne County
172 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1935
Evans v. Willis, 22 Okla. 310 , 97 P. 1047 ; Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 P. 237 ; Billings Hotel Co. v. City of Enid, 77 Okla. 122 , 186 P. 1085 ; Ware v. Walden, 140 Okla. 7 , 282 P. 289 . … In the case of Looney v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRogers v. State Election Board of Oklahoma
533 P.2d 621 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1974
Attorney General v. … In Murphy v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMadden v. Excise Board of Harmon County
160 Okla. 170 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1932
Madden and others, county officers of Harmon county, Okla., against the excise board of that county and others, to compel the approval of an estimate for their salaries for the year 1931, and to compel the levy of a tax sufficient … This contention has been sustained by this court in the recent case of Wade v. Board of County Commissioners, 161 Okla. -, 17 P. (2d) 690 , -is there held: “Chapter 109, S.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of County Commissioners v. Oklahoma City
484 P.2d 882 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1971
Johnston v. Conner, 205 Okl. 233 , 236 P.2d 987 (1951); Herndon v. Anderson, 165 Okl. 104 , 25 P.2d 326 (1933). … Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of Commissioners, Okl., 468 P.2d 501, 507-508 (1970); State ex rel. Tharel v. Board of Commissioners of Creek County, 188 Okl. 184 , 107 P.2d 542 (1940).
Cited 3 timesPublishedEmpire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board
168 Okla. 485 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1934
This action involves certain protested tax levies made by the excise board of Oklahoma county for the fiscal year of 1932-1933. … Prince, County Treas., v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co., 110 Okla. 141 , 237 P. 106 ; Ryan, Co. Treas., v. Roach Drug Co., 113 Okla. 130 , 239 P. 912 ; Bank of Picher v. Morris, 157 Okla. 122 , 11 P. (2d) 178 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
185 Okla. 625 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1939
In support of this contention they cite Rose v. Stalcup (1920) 78 Okla. 268 , 190 P. 396 ; Morris et al. v. Board of Commissioners of Love County (1919) 74 Okla. 199 , 177 P. 900 ; Boone v. … They quote, without argument, from Board of Equalization of Carter County v. Carter Oil Co. (1931) 152 Okla. 99 , 3 P.2d 816 , and Josey Oil Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna