Case law

Foster v. Harding

426 P.2d 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1967

Also see Stubbs v. Texas Liquor Control Board (Tex.Civ.App.) 166 S.W.2d 178 . In Newark Athletic Club v. … Ring v. Board of Ed. etc., 245 Ill. 334 , 92 N.E. 251 . And, it is suggested that a funeral service under such definition would render the mausoleum subject to the ordinances involved.

Young v. Boswell

191 Okla. 680 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1942

At the time (1927) Cheney v. … Miller v. Noble, 59 Okla. 29 , 157 P. 740 .

Weisberger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

199 Okla. 566 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1948

The plaintiff joined the county clerk and the board of county commissioners as defendants, but they are no longer in the case. … American Asbestos Products v. Ind.

Ponca Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Wilkinson

242 P.3d 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 2010

Barrett v. Board of County Comm'rs of Tulsa County, 1939 OK 68, ¶ 0 (syllabus 3) and ¶ 7, 185 Okla. 111 , 90 P.2d 442 , 443 and 446. … Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc., 2006 OK 98, ¶ 13 , 152 P.3d 861, 868 . In Loyal Order of the Moose, Lodge 1785 v.

Mills v. Lynch

121 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1926

school district shall be attached to and become a part of such consolidated district upon petition to the county superintendent signed by a ma-' jority of the legal voters of such territory desiring to be attached and by the board … School District No. 24, Custer County, v. Renick, County Superintendent, 83 Okla. 158 , 201 Pac. 241 .

Spilman v. Oklahoma Bar Assoc.

240 P.3d 702 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 2010

Board of Law Library Trustees of Oklahoma County v. State ex rel. Petuskey, 1991 OK 122 , 825 P.2d 1285, 1290-1291 (The Supreme Court, its administrative director appointed under Art. 7, § 6, Okla. … .); Board of Commissioners of Carter County v.

Stout v. Wollmann

69 O.B.A.J. 2146 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1998

The jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant. ¶ 3 The issue of a defense expert’s malpractice insurance coverage in common with a defendant is controlled by this Court’s recent decision in Mills v. … In addition, the expert was, at the time of trial, a paid member of PLICO’s board of directors.

Morgan Sash & Door Co. v. Cullen Lbr. Co.

195 Okla. 448 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1945

In Hall (Brown, Administrator) v. … In Brown, Price Administrator, v. Click Bros.

Replogle v. Neff

176 Okla. 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 14, 1936

Myers v. Garland et al., 122 Okla. 71 , 251 P. 34 . … In the case of Nirdlinger v.

Wheeler v. Brockmeier Company

418 P.2d 693 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1966

Updegraff v. City of Norman, Okl., 287 P.2d 909 . … It is true, as argued by plaintiffs, that in Hillsdale Co. v.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

166 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1933

In Albrecht v. Jones, Co. Treas., 130 Okla. 277 , 267 P. 270 , it was held that in determining the amount of surplus balance of revenue or levy, under the provisions of section 9699, C. O. … Under the provisions thereof, in determining the rates of levy for ad valorem taxation, the procedure is as follows; First, the excise board shall ascertain the total valuation of .the property taxed ad valorem in the taxing

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Jackson

61 Okla. 146 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1916

Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U. S. 211 , 36 Sup. Ct. 595, 60 L. Ed. 961 . and of St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Brown. 241 U. S. 223 , 36 Sup. Ct. 602, 60 L. Ed. 966 , the decision of this court in St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. … Co. v.

Messer & Westbrook v. White Sewing MacH. Co.

48 Okla. 561 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

As said in Taby v. … (Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown, 19 Okla. 77 , 91 Pac. 849 .)

Miller v. Robberson

204 Okla. 114 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1951

But in Elliott v. Clement, 175 Ore. 44 , 149 P. 2d 985 ; Kerr v. Small, 112 Mont. 490 , 117 P. 2d 271 , and Young v. … And in Morton v.

Wickware v. National Mortgage Corp. of America

570 P.2d 330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1977

Brown, to Appellee. The security for which possession was asked in this case was situated in Carter County, Oklahoma. … Helfinstine v. Martin, 561 P.2d 951 (Okl.1977); Dumas v. Conyer, 448 P.2d 835 (Okl.1968).

CITY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. v. Owens

565 P.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1977

Brown. David W. Edmonds, Oklahoma City, for respondent Carl Stephens. Burton J. Johnson, Oklahoma City, for respondent W.A. Malchi, Jr. John A. … Brown and Carl Stephens. The case, after several years, came on for trial in December of 1976.

Cahill v. Pine Creek Oil Co.

38 Okla. 568 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1913

In the case of McDonald v. … To like effect are the cases of Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 1049 ; Olds v. Conger, 1 Okla. 232 , 32 Pac. 337 ; Conaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 127 ; Burdette v. Corgam, 27 Kan. 275 .

Thomas v. Dawson

189 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1941

Shore v. Board of Education of Town of Crescent et al., 97 Okla. 273 , 223 P. 867 ; Cheek v. Eye, 96 Okla. 44 , 219 P. 883 ; Chambers v. Walker, 85 Okla. 289 , 206 P. 202 ; Fowler v. Park, 79 Okla. 1 , 190 P. 668 . … State v. Holtzclaw, 151 Okla. 163 , 2 P. 2d 1022 . Judgment affirmed. WELCH, C. J„ and RILEY, GIBSON, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Spencer v. Barby

301 P.2d 1012 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1956

We held in Salaney v. … We think the rule adopted in Smith v. Board of Police Com’rs of City of Los Angeles, 1 Cal.App. 2d 292 , 36 P.2d 670, 671 , is the proper one and we apply it to this case.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Wells

56 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1916

Co. v. Freeland, 39 Okla. 60 , 134 Pac. 47 .) . … (Rhyne v. Turley, 37 Okla. 159 , 131 Pac. 695 .)