Opinion

Mills v. Lynch

  • 121 Okla. 101
  • 247 P. 981
  • 1926 OK 594
  • 1926 Okla. LEXIS 64
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Jun 29, 1926
Status
Published
Author
Nicholson
On the bench
Nicholson, Phelps
Cited by
9 cases
Authority
More cited than 80.3%

The opinion

NICHOLSON, C. J.

This cause is here by certiorari to review the action of the county superintendent of pnblic instruction of Kingfisher county, in ordering the annexation of school district No. 49 to consolidated school district No. 2, of said county.

At the time t.iiis proceeding was had, there were 04 legal voters residing in school district No. 49. On February 11, 1920, a petition bearing the names of 35 voters of said district was presented to the county superintendent, asking that said district be

*102

consolidated with consolidated school district No. 2. Afterwards, and before said petition was acted upon by the county superintendent, lour of the persons signing said petition removed from said district, and 9 others who had signed such petitions withdrew, in writing, their names therefrom. On March 9, 1926, the county superintendent, acting upon the petition as filed, made the order of consolidation here complained of.

By the provisions of section 10462, Comp. Stat. 1921, all or a part of any school district adjacent to a consolidated school district shall be attached to and become a part of such consolidated district upon petition to the county superintendent signed by a ma-' jority of the legal voters of such territory desiring to be attached and by the board of directors of such consolidated district. By these provisions the county superintendent was authorized' to' make the order of consolidation only upon a petirion signed by a majority of the legal voters of the district. These voters withdrawing their names had a right to do so at any time before the petition was acted upon by the county superintendent, and the names so withdrawn could not be counted as signers of the petition. School District No. 24, Custer County, v. Renick, County Superintendent, 83 Okla. 158 , 201 Pac. 241 . The petition, when acted upon, did not contain a majority of the legal voters of the district, and the county superintendent was without authority to order the consolidation.

The cause is reversed, with directions to dismiss the petition.

All the Justices concur, except PHELPS, J., absent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.