Case law

Hudson v. Hopkins &8212 McGuire v. McCurdy

75 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1919

The literal import of the terms and phrases employed will be controlled by the objects which the act was designed to reach " In the case of Board of County Commissioners v. … United States v. Board of Com’rs of Osage County (C. C.) 193 Fed. 485 .

Kroeger v. Martin

72 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1919

Miller v. Folsom, 49 Okla. 74 , 149 Pac. 1185 ; Welch v. Ellis, 63 Okla. 158 , 163 Pac. 321 ; Rich v. Doneghey, supra. … Obviously the court misapplied the law in reliance upon ihe recently overruled opinion of this court in Brown v. Wilson. 58 Okla. 392 , 160 Pac. 94 , L. R. A. 1917B, 1184.

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMOND

2023 OK 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 2023

Justice v. … Discussed at Length 2015 OK 58 , 378 P.3d 54 , EDWARDS v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Discussed 2016 OK 121 , 387 P.3d 348 , BURNS v.

Longfellow v. Byrne

68 Okla. 314 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Fryer, 35 Okla. 145 . 128 Pac. 713 ; Arthur v. Coyne, 32 Okla. 527 , 122 Pac. 688 ; Sims v. Brown et al. 46 Okla. 767 , 149 Pac. 876 : Gillum v. … Chouteau v. Chouteau, 49 Okla. 105 , 152 Pac. 378 ; Squires et al. v. Clark et al., 17 Kan. 84 ; Warfield v. Lindell, 30 Mo. 272 , 77 Am. Dec. 614 ; Colman et al. v. Clements et al., 23 Cal. 245 . In Dobbins v.

Thompson v. William Ede Co.

187 Okla. 469 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1940

United States v. California and O. Land Co., 192 U. S. 355 , 48 L. Ed. 476 , 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 266; Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Clanton, 167 Okla. 106 , 28 P. 2d 566 ; Roche v. McDonnell, 275 U. S. 449 , 72 L. … The defendant cites United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 62 , 25 L. Ed. 93 ; Brown v. Trent, 36 Okla. 239 , 128 P. 895 ; McIntosh v.

Nelson v. Jones

93 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

In a recent case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington, Linn v. … Browning et al. v. De Ford, 8 Okla. 239 , 60 Pac. 534 .

Derr v. Fisher

22 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1908

Henry on the part of the light and power company, and was afterwards ratified as he testified by the board of directors. Counsel for receiver cites the case of Davis v. … Rep. 234 ; Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Company v. Rodrigues, 47 Ill. 188 , 95 Am. Dec. 484 ; McCrory et al. v. Chambers et al., 48 Ill. App. 445 ; State Board of Agriculture v.

Howard v. Jeffrey

268 P.2d 897 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1953

Tiger v. Brown, 130 Okl. 83 , 265 P. 124 . … See Pennington v. Newman, 36 Okl. 594 , 129 P. 693 ; Spencer v. Hamilton, 156 Okl. 194 , 13 P.2d 81, 82 . However, there are exceptions to this rule, as pointed out in Spencer v.

Southwestern Commercial Capital, Inc. v. Cornett Packing Co.

997 P.2d 849 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 2000

Shamblin v. Beasley, 1998 OK 88 , 967 P.2d 1200 , citing with approval, Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791 , 103 S.Ct. 2706, 2712 , 77 L.Ed.2d 180 (1983). … Co. v. Board of Tax Roll Corrections, 1964 OK 62 , 391 P.2d 810 .

Garrison v. Street & Harper Furniture & Carpet Co.

21 Okla. 643 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1908

Dayton v. Savings Bank, 23 Kan. 421 ; Savings Bank v. Sargent, 20 Kan. 576; Nash v. Norment, 5 Mo. App. 545 ; Eastman v. Water Bower Co., 24 Minn. 437 ; Read v. Wilson, 22 Ill. 377 , 74 Am. Dec. 159 ; Frank v. … Miner, 50 Ill. 444 ; Chipron v. Feikert, 68 Ill. 284 ; McTaggart v. Rose, 14 Ind. 230 ; Brown v. Platt, 8 Bosw. (N. Y.) 324; Brown v. Webb, 20 Ohio, 389; Chapman v. Weimer, 4 Ohio St. 481 ; Field v.

In Re Evans

72 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1919

In re Smith, 73 Kan. 743 , 85 Pac. 584 ; In re Elliott, 73 Kan. 151 , 84 Pac. 750 ; People v. Tanquary, 48 Colo. 122 , 109 Pac. 260 . In State Board v. Shimer, 131 Tenn. 343 , 174 S. … Again in State Bar Commission v. Sullivan, 35 Okla. 745 , 131 Pac. 704 , L. R.

City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.

25 Okla. 648 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1910

Brown, T. J. Abbott, John W. Freeborn, A. L. Nicholson, L. J. Stoneman, William Devine, J. M. Carter and W. B. … To the same effect is Hannan v. Board of Education of the City of Lawton, ante, p. 372, 107 Pac. 646 .

Patterson v. Wilson

203 Okla. 527 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1950

In Cantrell v. … In Burt v.

State v. Lynch

61 O.B.A.J. 2102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1990

Brown v. State, 677 P.2d 1089, 1091 (Okla. Crim.App.1984); Johnson v. State, 599 P.2d 416, 418 (Okla.Crim.App.1979). . Title 30 O.S.Supp.1988 § 3-107 provides in pertinent part: "A. … Recently, in Federal Trade Comm. v.

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

146 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1930

In support thereof the protestant cites a decision of this court in Dickinson v. … Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, Co.

City of Okmulgee v. Wall

193 Okla. 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1943

Hatmaker, 189 Okla. 317 , 116 P. 2d 973 ; Greis v. Harjo, 185 Okla. 474 , 94 P. 2d 539 ; Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. … Gripe v. Hatmaker, supra; Bowles v. Brown, 187 Okla. 264 , 102 P. 2d 837 .

MacSuga v. Moreno

74 O.B.A.J. 947 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2003

Cherokee Lines, Inc. v. Bailey, 1993 OK 111, ¶1 , 859 P.2d 1106 , Beall v. Altus Public School Dist., 1981 OK 93, ¶3 , 632 P.2d 400, 401 . See also Osmus v. … Garrison v.

Turner v. Fleming

37 Okla. 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1913

Pickett v. Merchants’ Nat. Bank, 32 Ark. 346 ; Preston v. Hill, 50 Cal. 43 , 19 Am. Rep. 647 ; Derwort v. Loomer, 21 Conn. 245 ; Jones v. Inness, 32 Kan. 177 , 4 Pac. 95 ; 3 Ency. Law, 358; Hallack v. … Brown, 8 Biss. 534 , Fed. Cas. No. 11,143.

In Re Initiative Petition No. 260, State Question No. 377

298 P.2d 753 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1956

In re Initiative Petition No. 2, Cushing, Oklahoma (Jurney v. Harlow), supra; and State ex rel. Bryant v. Carter, 173 Okl. 293 , 49 P.2d 217 . Also see the case of Black v. … kept in accordance with the law. *757 There was no error in the refusal to direct the appearance of the Secretary of the Election Board of Oklahoma County or to issue a subpoena duces tecum.

Barnett v. Kennedy

185 Okla. 409 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1938

Co. v. … In Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co. (Cal.