Case law

Parks v. Stith

204 Okla. 625 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1951

Plaintiff in support of his contention that this statute provides the sole remedy in such case cites Board of Commissioners of Blaine County v. Foster, 173 Okla. 583 , 49 P. 2d 692 ; Savery v. … In Wilcox v.

Wellington v. Spencer

37 Okla. 461 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1913

See, also, Brown v. Master, 104 Ala. 451 , 16 South. 443 ; Beldon v. Granniss, 27 Conn. 511 . … Terre Haute v. Hudnut, 120 Ind. 550 et seq. [ 13 N. E. 686 ]; Chapman v. Kirby, 49 Ill. 219 ; Simmons v. Brown, 5 R. I. 299, 73 Am. Dec. 66 ; Gibson v. Fisher, 68 Iowa, 30 [ 25 N. W. 914 ]; Goebel v.

Gates v. Curry

301 P.2d 659 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1955

With reference to this and related matters, see Brown v. Stufflebean, 10 Cir., 187 F.2d 347 ; Glenn v. Lewis, 10 Cir., 105 F.2d 398 ; U. S. v. Easley, D.C.E.D.Okl., 33 F.Supp. 442 ; U. S. v. … As said in Brown v. Stufflebean, supra, the latter Act is “not a construction of the 1933 Act” [ 187 F.2d 356 .]

Warren v. Adams

187 Okla. 643 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1939

Co. v. … Giving consideration to these factors as well as the fact that in Rogers v. Bonnett, 2 Okla. 553 , 37 P. 1078 , and Watkinson et al. v.

United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Belew

325 P.2d 429 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1957

T. or Dick Moore was a subcontractor furnishing and installing the electrical material under a contract made by Clark Taylor with the school board. Moore is not a party to this action. W. E. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and WILLIAMS, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur.

Childers v. Samuels

107 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1924

Reynolds v. Fewell, 59 L. Ed. (U. S.) 465; Woodward v. De Graffenreid, 59 L. Ed. (U. S.) 1311; Bodle v. Shoenfelt, 22 Okla. 94 , 97 Pac. 556 ; Sanders v. Sanders, 28 Okla. 59 , 117 Pac. 338 ; Barnett v. … Way, 29 Okla. 780 , 119 Pac. 418 ; Bilby v. Brown, 34 Okla. 738 , 126 Pac. 1024 .

State v. Chickasha Milling Co.

180 Okla. 611 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1937

In Funkenstein v. Superior Court (Cal. … State v. Cushing Grocery Co., 135 Okla. 186 , 274 P. 876 ; State v. Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co., supra.

Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Montgomery

148 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1931

Co. v. Indus. Comm., 89 Okla. 24 , 213 Pac. 838 ; Farley v. H. T. Milling Co., 113 Okla. 112 , 239 Pac. 451 ; Okmulgee Demo. Pub. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 86 Okla. 62 , 206 Pac. 249 . The amendment of 1923. ch. 01, S. … Co. v. Indus. Comm., 113 Okla. 179 , 241 Pac. 170 ; Okla. Hospital v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Daxon

607 P.2d 683 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1980

Spearman v. Williams, 415 P.2d 597 (Okl.1966); Dobbs v. Board of County Commissioners of Okl. County, 208 Okl. 514 , 257 P.2d 802 (Okl.1953); Wentz v. Thomas, 159 Okl. 124 , 15 P.2d 65 (1932). … Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, 510 P.2d 680 (Okl.1973). . Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Clendinning, 193 Okl. 271 , 143 P.2d 143 (1943). . D. L. Peterson v.

Morris v. City of Oklahoma City

299 P.2d 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1956

This court recently held in Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034, 1035 , that such indebtedness' is not unconstitutional. … In Atlas Life Insurance Company v. Board of Education of City of Tulsa, 83 Okl. 12 , 200 P. 171 , this Court upheld a 99 year lease by a school district.

Summers v. Powers

181 Okla. 549 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1937

As stated in the case of Turner v. … Ellis v. Armstrong, 28 Okla. 311 , 114 P. 327 ; Rider v. Brown, 1 Okla. 244 , 32 P. 341 ; Beadles v. Fry, 15 Okla. 428 , 82 P. 1041 , 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 855.

Bilby v. Cathcart

51 Okla. 189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1915

Lane, 31 Okla. 757 , 123 Pac. 1061 ; Brown & Bridgeman v. Western Casket Co., 30 Okla. 144 , 120 Pac. 1001 ; Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co., 32 Okla. 280 , 122 Pac. 241 ; Stump v. … Porter, 31 Okla. 157 , 120 Pac. 639 ; State v.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Henson

44 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914

The trial court doubtless had in mind, and acted upon the case of Brown v. Yates, 24 Okla. 231 , 103 Pac. 667 , and under that decision the ruling would have been correct; but in the later case of Barnard v. … Held, reversible error, overruling Brown v. Yates, 24 Okla. 231 , 103 Pac. 667 .”

In Re Initiative Petition No. 382

142 P.3d 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2006

See Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County v. Lowery, supra at ¶ 15, 136 P.3d 639 ; City of Midwest City v. House of Realty, Inc., supra at ¶ 15, 100 P.3d 678 . … Nucholls v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Tulsa, see note 18, supra. 20 . Stewart v. Rood, 1990 OK 69, ¶ 38 , 796 P.2d 321 (overruled on other grounds in Dulaney v.

State v. Smith

151 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1931

Defendant was a member of the board of county commissioners of Caddo county... … J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. ANDREWS, J., absent.

Central Nat. Bank v. Sharp

168 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1934

He relies upon Littlefield v. Brown, 68 Okla. 144 , 172 P. 643 ; Rice v. Bontjes, 121 Okla. 292 , 250 P. 89 ; Harmon v. Nofire, 131 Okla. 1 , 267 P. 650 ; Jones v. Standiferd, 69 Kan. 513 ; Curry v. … Prior to the decision of this court in Wood v.

Hamilton v. Barber

474 P.2d 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1970

Board of Adjustment v. Shanbour, Okl., 435 P.2d 569 ; Thompson v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 194 Okl. 77 , 147 P.2d 451 . See also 11 O.S. 1961 , Sec. 407, and Sec. 13.19.05B, Revised Ordinances of Oklahoma City. … In the journal entry of judgment, the trial court found in effect that the applicants had met the burden of proof under which they labored by virtue of the cited rule from Board of Adjustment v.

Van Meter v. Westgate Oil Co.

168 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 1934

We said in Anderson-Kerr v. … O. v. Larkins, 168 Okla. 69, 81 . P. (2d) 608, an exception to one or more provisions of the ordinances was granted.

Perry Water, Light & Ice Co. v. City of Perry

29 Okla. 593 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

The township board, and, possibly, the bridge and manufacturing company, mistook the law. … . —), not yet reported, it was held that where the majority of the members of a board of a school district employed a law firm to defend the board in a suit brought against it, at an agreed fee of $75, though the board may

Modern Woodmen of America, Camp. No. 6967 v. Tulsa Modern Woodmen Bldg. Ass'n

264 P.2d 993 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1953

See County Assessor, Oklahoma County, v. … See Richardson v.