Case law

Miller v. Ury

23 Okla. 546 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1909

By the decree defendants were commanded, as members of the county election board of Muskogee county, to place and print the name of plaintiff as a candidate for the nomination of alderman in the First ward of the city of … The decisions of the court upon this question are well collected in Albright et al. v. Erickson, ante, p. 444, 102 Pac. 112 . Parsons v. Tetirick, 63 Kan. 879 , 64 Pac. 1028 , is a case in point.

Cook v. McCord

9 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

In the case of Betts v. Townley, 20 L. … (Johnson v. Towsley, 13 Wall 84, 20 Coop. Ed. 487.) And it was said in Shepley v. Cowan, 91 U. S. (Co-op.

Mullen v. Mitchell

81 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1921

VI), and no reason is given for his failure to file the same, and for this reason the appeal should be dismissed under the authority of Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16 , 183 Pac. 880 . … Laws 1919; Board of Com’rs of Cleveland Co. v. Barr et al., 68 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 206 ; Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. Lamb et al., 79 Okla. 109 , 189 Pac. 750 ; Stephenson v.

Albright v. Erickson

23 Okla. 544 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1909

Parker et al. v. Territory ex rel. Bostic, 20 Okla. 851 , 94 Pac. 175 ; Harmon v. Burt, 20 Okla. 509 , 94 Pac. 528 ; Freeman v. Board of Medical Examiners, 20 Okla. 610 , 95 Pac. 229 ; Burkhalter v. … Co. v. Territory, 21 Okla. 329 , 97 Pac. 265 ; Conly v. Overholzer et al. 22 Okla. 623 , 98 Pac. 331; Braun v. Stillwater Advance Ptg. & Pub. Co., 22 Okla. 620 , 98 Pac. 426 ; Bachman et al. v.

Gates v. Curry

301 P.2d 659 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1955

With reference to this and related matters, see Brown v. Stufflebean, 10 Cir., 187 F.2d 347 ; Glenn v. Lewis, 10 Cir., 105 F.2d 398 ; U. S. v. Easley, D.C.E.D.Okl., 33 F.Supp. 442 ; U. S. v. … As said in Brown v. Stufflebean, supra, the latter Act is “not a construction of the 1933 Act” [ 187 F.2d 356 .]

BERKSON v. STATE ex rel. ASKINS AS ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS

2023 OK 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 2023

See , e.g. , Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841 Dani v. Miller , 2016 OK 35 374 P.3d 779 See , e.g. , Nicholson v. … Southon v. Okla. Tire Recyclers, LLC , 2019 OK 37 443 P.3d 566 Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841

Childers v. Samuels

107 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1924

Reynolds v. Fewell, 59 L. Ed. (U. S.) 465; Woodward v. De Graffenreid, 59 L. Ed. (U. S.) 1311; Bodle v. Shoenfelt, 22 Okla. 94 , 97 Pac. 556 ; Sanders v. Sanders, 28 Okla. 59 , 117 Pac. 338 ; Barnett v. … Way, 29 Okla. 780 , 119 Pac. 418 ; Bilby v. Brown, 34 Okla. 738 , 126 Pac. 1024 .

Walker v. Bowman

27 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1910

App. 108 ; Security Abstract of Title Co. et al. v. Longacre, Adm’r, 56 Neb. 469 , 76 N. W. 1073 ; Brown v. Sims, 22 Ind. App. 317 , 53 N. E. 779 , 72 Am. St. *174 Rep. 308; Russell v. … Y.] 499; Ham v. Hill, 29 Mo. 276 ; Rowsey v. Lynch, 61 Mo. 560 .”

Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. Smith

69 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1916

In Brown v. … Brown v. Trent, supra; United States v. Throckmorten, 98 U. S. 61 , 25 L. Ed. 93 ; Alder v. Van Kirk Land & Construction Co., 114 Ala. 551 , 21 South. 490 , 62 Am. St. Rep. 133 ; Graham v. Loh, 32 Ind. App. 183 , 69 N.

Great Southwestern Life Ins. Co. v. Gibson

179 Okla. 410 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1937

Upon the authority of Great Southern Life Insurance Co. v. Brooks, 166 Okla. 123 , 26 P. (2d) 430 , and General American Life Insurance Co. v. … J., BAYLESS, V. O. J., and WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ„ concur.

Palmer v. Town of Skiatook

203 Okla. 316 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1950

In State v. … In Price v.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Henson

44 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914

The trial court doubtless had in mind, and acted upon the case of Brown v. Yates, 24 Okla. 231 , 103 Pac. 667 , and under that decision the ruling would have been correct; but in the later case of Barnard v. … Held, reversible error, overruling Brown v. Yates, 24 Okla. 231 , 103 Pac. 667 .”

Parks v. Stith

204 Okla. 625 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1951

Plaintiff in support of his contention that this statute provides the sole remedy in such case cites Board of Commissioners of Blaine County v. Foster, 173 Okla. 583 , 49 P. 2d 692 ; Savery v. … In Wilcox v.

Ray v. School Dist. No. 9, Caddo County

21 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1908

In the case of the Board of County Commissioners of Roger Mills County v. Sauer et al., 8 Okla. 411 , 58 Pac. 626 , Justice Hainer, speaking for the court, said: “We think the demurrer was properly sustained. … The case comes clearly within the rule laid down in the case of Board v.

Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Montgomery

148 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1931

Co. v. Indus. Comm., 89 Okla. 24 , 213 Pac. 838 ; Farley v. H. T. Milling Co., 113 Okla. 112 , 239 Pac. 451 ; Okmulgee Demo. Pub. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 86 Okla. 62 , 206 Pac. 249 . The amendment of 1923. ch. 01, S. … Co. v. Indus. Comm., 113 Okla. 179 , 241 Pac. 170 ; Okla. Hospital v.

Wilson Motor Co. v. Dunn

129 Okla. 211 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1928

Bk. v. Kreuzberg) is distinguished from Chadwell v. Brown, 88 Okla. 44 , 211 Pac. 410 . … McFadyn v. Masters, 11 Okla. 16 , 66 Pac. 284 ; Broyles v. McInteer, 29 Okla. 767 , 120 Pac. 283 ; Stone v. Am. Nat. Bk., 24 Okla. 786 , 127 Pac. 393 ; Bottoms v. Clark, 38 Okla. 243 , 132 Pac. 904 ; Brown v.

Parsons v. Evans

44 Okla. 751 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

.” *756 In Williams v. Brown, 137 Mich. 569 , 100 N. W. 786 , the same question was considered. … Other authorities to the same effect are Tullis v. Orth wein, 5 Minn. 377 ( Gil. 305 ); Berge v. Kittleson, 133 Wis. 664 , 114 N. W. 125 ; Williams v. Brown, 137 Mich. 569 , 100 N. W. 786 ; Haskins v.

Sterling Refining Co. v. Walker

165 Okla. 45 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 16, 1933

Co. v. … Co. v.

Harlow Pub. Corporation v. Smith

199 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1947

As held by this court in Durham v. … Brown, 164 Okla. 139 , 24 P. 2d 295 , in such case it is not the duty of this court to search for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court, but where the authorities reasonably support the allegations

Lowe v. Storozyszyn

183 Okla. 471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1938

V. … W. 2d 1111 , it is said: “In 29 Corpus Juris, 567, it is said; ‘Being governmental agencies, highway boards or commissioners, as such, are not ordinarily liable in tort.’