Case law

Gould v. Smith

405 P.2d 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1965

Smith v. Bruner’s Guardianship, supra. Also see the third paragraph of the syllabus of In re Fox’ Estate (Warren v. Green), supra. Parker et al. v. … Brown v. Brown et al., Okl., 355 P.2d 1034 .

State Ex Rel. Strain v. Wells

98 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1923

Board of Liquidation of the State of La. & La. Levee Co. v. McComb, 92 U. S. 531 , 23 L. Ed. 623 . Complainants in their brief set forth at length sections 276-302-303-304, Rev. … Justice Lamar in his opinion says: “This case cannot be distinguished in principle from Osborn v. Bank of United States, Davis v. Gray, Board of Liquidation v. McComb, and Allen v.

Overstreet v. Bush

208 Okla. 365 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1953

McGlone v. Landreth, 200 Okla. 425 , 195 P. 2d 268 . *366 Defendant argues that the instructions as given by the court were correct, citing Browne v. … The holding in Safe-Way Cab Service Co. v. Gadberry, 180 Okla. 51 , 67 P. 2d 434 , is to the same effect.

Great Southwestern Life Ins. Co. v. Gibson

179 Okla. 410 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1937

Upon the authority of Great Southern Life Insurance Co. v. Brooks, 166 Okla. 123 , 26 P. (2d) 430 , and General American Life Insurance Co. v. … J., BAYLESS, V. O. J., and WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ„ concur.

Palmer v. Town of Skiatook

203 Okla. 316 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1950

In State v. … In Price v.

Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil Company

394 P.2d 515 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1964

Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, 189 Okl. 286 , 116 P.2d 700, 702 . No contention is made here that this proceeding was brought too late. … Clapper v. Putnam Co., 70 Okl. 99 , 158 P. 297, 298 ; Wagner v. A., T. & S. F. R. Co., 73 Kan. 283 , 85 P. 299 ; Chivers v. Board of Com’rs of Johnston County, 62 Okl. 2 , 161 P. 822, 824 , L.R.A.1917B, 1296.

Ray v. School Dist. No. 9, Caddo County

21 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1908

In the case of the Board of County Commissioners of Roger Mills County v. Sauer et al., 8 Okla. 411 , 58 Pac. 626 , Justice Hainer, speaking for the court, said: “We think the demurrer was properly sustained. … The case comes clearly within the rule laid down in the case of Board v.

State Bank of Miami v. City of Miami

43 Okla. 809 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1914

See Johnson v. Board, 7 Okla. 686 , 56 Pac. 701 ; Board of County Com’rs v. De Lana, 8 Okla. 215 , 57 Pac. 162 . … In Andrew County ex rel. v. Schell, 135 Mo. 31 , 36 S. W. 206 , the court, in construing the section of the Constitution almost identical with section 26, art. 10, Const.

State Ex Rel. Boatman v. District Court of Okmulgee County

122 Okla. 69 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1926

Duling, 86 Okla. 171 , 207 Pac. 293 ; Martin v. O’Reilly, 81 Okla. 261 , 200 Pac. 687 . See, also, Oklahoma City v. Corporation Commission, 80 Okla. 194 , 195 Pac. 498 . … And, following tbe rule laid down in Payne v.

Richards v. Rose

119 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1925

In Coyle v. … Board of Com’rs of Kay County, 38 Okla. 370 , 132 Pac. 1113 , it was held that the board of county commissioners had no authority, subsequent to the filing of the petition and appointment of viewers by the district judge,

Harlow Pub. Corporation v. Smith

199 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1947

As held by this court in Durham v. … Brown, 164 Okla. 139 , 24 P. 2d 295 , in such case it is not the duty of this court to search for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court, but where the authorities reasonably support the allegations

Buehl v. American Indemnity Co.

72 Okla. 95 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1919

The opinion cites in its support Cook v. Challiss, 55 Kan. 363 , 40 Pac. 643 . The rule annunced in Walcher v. Stone, supra, was followed in Manley v. Halsell, 43 Okla. 402 , 143 Pac. 193 . … In Blitz v. Brown, 7 Wall. 693 , 19 L. Ed. 280 , there was only a ■blank form of authentication to the transcript filed, without the seal of the court be•low or the signature of its clerk.

BERKSON v. STATE ex rel. ASKINS AS ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS

2023 OK 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 2023

See , e.g. , Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841 Dani v. Miller , 2016 OK 35 374 P.3d 779 See , e.g. , Nicholson v. … Southon v. Okla. Tire Recyclers, LLC , 2019 OK 37 443 P.3d 566 Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841

Voightlander v. State Ex Rel. Barnett

175 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935

W. 826 ; Pike v. Emerson, 5 N. H. 393, 22 Am. Dec. 468 ; Stevenson v. Felton, 99 N. C. 58 , 5 S. E. 399 ; Brown v. Pechman, 5 S. C. 555, 33 S. E. 732 ; Ish v. Crane, 13 Ohio St. Rep. 574 . … In the case of Brown v.

Frates v. Whitson

195 Okla. 129 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1945

Thereafter Whitson purchased the property from the board of county commissioners and received from the chairman of that board a deed, which described the .property as: ..... “ 21.61 acres Sy2 NE14 and NE SEy4 and N% NW% and … Miller v. Noble, 59 Okla. 29 , 157 P. 740 ; Gilbert v. Conservative Loan & Trust Co., 138 Okla. 1 , 280 P. 278 ; Stout v. Mastin, 139 U. S. 151 , 35 L. Ed. 121 .

Price v. McDowell

52 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1915

Browne on the Statute of Frauds (5th Ed.), section 441, says: “It seems to be’ well established that where a contract, affected by the statute, has been put in writing, and the plaintiff, in a case of subsequent oral variation … See Bonicamp v. Starbuck, 25 Okla. 483 , 106 Pac. 839 ; Baker v. Haswell & Taylor, 36 Okla. 429 , 128 Pac. 1086 ; 1 *611 Beach on the Modern Law of Contracts, section 579; Wood on Statute of Frauds, section 384.

Lowe v. Storozyszyn

183 Okla. 471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1938

V. … W. 2d 1111 , it is said: “In 29 Corpus Juris, 567, it is said; ‘Being governmental agencies, highway boards or commissioners, as such, are not ordinarily liable in tort.’

Taylor v. Scott

83 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1921

Condit v. Condit, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 456 ; Bolling v. Campbell, 36 Okla. 671 , 128 Pac. 1091 ; Scott v. Brown, 40 Okla. 148 , 137 Pac. 113 ; Bruner v. Nordmeyer, 48 Okla. 415 , 150 Pac. 159 ; Jefferson v. … Condit v. Condit, supra, and other cases above cited.

Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 108 v. City of Ardmore

73 O.B.A.J. 903 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 2002

See Ross v. … In Booher v.

Mullen v. Mitchell

81 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1921

VI), and no reason is given for his failure to file the same, and for this reason the appeal should be dismissed under the authority of Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16 , 183 Pac. 880 . … Laws 1919; Board of Com’rs of Cleveland Co. v. Barr et al., 68 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 206 ; Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. Lamb et al., 79 Okla. 109 , 189 Pac. 750 ; Stephenson v.