Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.74s
State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. District Court of Nowata County
519 P.2d 513 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1974
State Board of Education v. District Court of Bryan County, Okl., 290 P.2d 413 . We agree with this line of argument. … In Kansas City v.
Cited 28 timesPublished52 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1915
Browne on the Statute of Frauds (5th Ed.), section 441, says: “It seems to be’ well established that where a contract, affected by the statute, has been put in writing, and the plaintiff, in a case of subsequent oral variation … See Bonicamp v. Starbuck, 25 Okla. 483 , 106 Pac. 839 ; Baker v. Haswell & Taylor, 36 Okla. 429 , 128 Pac. 1086 ; 1 *611 Beach on the Modern Law of Contracts, section 579; Wood on Statute of Frauds, section 384.
Cited 3 timesPublished193 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1943
See Brown v. Bassett, 191 Okla. 22 , 126 P. 2d 705 , and cases therein cited. … In Belford v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedFirst Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. Casteel
137 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1929
In Horstman v. … Bank v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBuehl v. American Indemnity Co.
72 Okla. 95 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1919
The opinion cites in its support Cook v. Challiss, 55 Kan. 363 , 40 Pac. 643 . The rule annunced in Walcher v. Stone, supra, was followed in Manley v. Halsell, 43 Okla. 402 , 143 Pac. 193 . … In Blitz v. Brown, 7 Wall. 693 , 19 L. Ed. 280 , there was only a ■blank form of authentication to the transcript filed, without the seal of the court be•low or the signature of its clerk.
Cited 9 timesPublishedVoightlander v. State Ex Rel. Barnett
175 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935
W. 826 ; Pike v. Emerson, 5 N. H. 393, 22 Am. Dec. 468 ; Stevenson v. Felton, 99 N. C. 58 , 5 S. E. 399 ; Brown v. Pechman, 5 S. C. 555, 33 S. E. 732 ; Ish v. Crane, 13 Ohio St. Rep. 574 . … In the case of Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublished199 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1947
Under such circumstances, as stated in Durham v. … Brown, 164 Okla. 139 , 24 P. 2d 295 , it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but this court may reverse and remand the cause, with directions
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Nitrogen Co. v. Lucas
655 P.2d 1031 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1982
The Board of Tax-roll Corrections denied the request. *1032 Appellant then brought its action in the trial court seeking relief under 68 O.S.1974 § 2479. … In denying appellant’s claim for refund, the court relied on the case of Cantrell v. Sanders, 610 P.2d 227 (1980), where an improper ratio was also at issue.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Hensley
560 P.2d 567 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1977
In State ex rel Oklahoma Bar Ass’n. v. … LAVENDER, V. C.
Cited 25 timesPublishedSt. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Pinkston
420 P.2d 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1966
Co. v. Brown, 112 Okl. 1 , 239 P. 599 ; Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Groves, 20 Okl. 101 , 93 P. 755 , 22 L.R.A.,N.S., 802. In Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKrieger v. Consolidated Dist. No. 2, Vanoss
205 Okla. 18 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1951
In Locke v. … In Weideman v. Staheli, 88 Cal.
Cited 0 timesPublished42 Okla. 374 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1914
Co. v. … “In Dewey Portland Cement Co. v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedIn Re Oklahoma Development Finance Authority
89 P.3d 1075 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 2004
Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 1997 OK 117 , 946 P.2d 1140 , a qui tam action, we heard a challenge to the city's expenditure of public fund to induce a private land trust to lease land to a retailer. … FENT V.
Cited 13 timesPublishedTownley Dairy Farms v. Greenwood
321 P.2d 704 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1957
Board of Com’rs of Lincoln County, 195 Okl. 400 , 158 P.2d 341 ; Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. Van Dusen, supra; Dalton Barnard Hardware Co. v. Gates, 203 Okl. 268 , 220 P.2d 249 ; and Fetteroff v. … In Renner v. Board of Com’rs of Lincoln County, supra, claimant was employed by the highway department of that county.
Cited 2 timesPublished405 P.2d 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1965
Smith v. Bruner’s Guardianship, supra. Also see the third paragraph of the syllabus of In re Fox’ Estate (Warren v. Green), supra. Parker et al. v. … Brown v. Brown et al., Okl., 355 P.2d 1034 .
Cited 9 timesPublished541 P.2d 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1975
Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, 189 Okl. 286 , 116 P.2d 700 (1941); Oklahoma City v. Prieto, supra. … J., HODGES, V. C. J., and DAVISON, IRWIN, BERRY, BARNES and SIMMS, JJ., concur. 1 . Laws Thirty-Fifth Legislature, First Regular Session-1975, Oh. 350 H.B. No. 1314. 2 . Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedProtest of Midland Valley Railroad
167 Okla. 327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1934
Hatfield v. Moreland, 152 Okla. 37 , 3 P. (2d) 803 , and Faught v. … Co. v. Goad, Co. Treas., 117 Okla. 129 , 245 P. 617 ; In re Gypsy Oil Co., 141 Okla. 291 , 285 P. 67 , and Going, Co. Treas., v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry.
Cited 2 timesPublishedProtest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
143 Okla. 170 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1930
This is an appeal from tbe judgment of tbe Court of Tax Review sustaining tbe protest of tbe Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company against the rate of tax levy fixed by the excise board of Coal county for the sinking … Van Arsdale v. Olustee School District, 23 Okla. 894 , 101 Pac. 1121 ; City of Sulphur v. State ex rel. Lankford, 62 Okla. 312 , 162 Pac. 744 , and Hamilton Tp. v. Okmulgee County,, 81 Okla. 256 , 198 Pac. 300 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedFt. Smith W. R. Co. v. Williams
30 Okla. 726 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1912
Norton, 22 Kan. 374 ; Brown v. Hadley, 43 Kan. 267 , 23 Pac. 492 ; Town Co. v. Lincoln, 56 Kan. 145 , 42 Pac. 706 . In the case of Williams v. … E. 291 ; Brown v. Hadley, 43 Kan. 267 , 23 Pac. 492 ; Hoge v. Norton, 22 Kan. 374 ; Hadley v. Baxendale, 9 Exch. 341; 26 Eng. L. & Eq. 398 (a leading case both in England and America); Tootle v.
Cited 22 timesPublished194 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1944
McCoy v. Hall, 191 Okla. 311 , 131 P. 2d 60 . a. The statute, 70 O. … In School District No. 37 v. Latimer, 190 Okla. 620 , 126 P. 2d 280 , we sustained the statute as against an attack on certain constitutional grounds. Judgment affirmed. CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna