Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.74s

  • State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. District Court of Nowata County

    519 P.2d 513 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1974

    State Board of Education v. District Court of Bryan County, Okl., 290 P.2d 413 . We agree with this line of argument. … In Kansas City v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Price v. McDowell

    52 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1915

    Browne on the Statute of Frauds (5th Ed.), section 441, says: “It seems to be’ well established that where a contract, affected by the statute, has been put in writing, and the plaintiff, in a case of subsequent oral variation … See Bonicamp v. Starbuck, 25 Okla. 483 , 106 Pac. 839 ; Baker v. Haswell & Taylor, 36 Okla. 429 , 128 Pac. 1086 ; 1 *611 Beach on the Modern Law of Contracts, section 579; Wood on Statute of Frauds, section 384.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Little v. Lovett

    193 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1943

    See Brown v. Bassett, 191 Okla. 22 , 126 P. 2d 705 , and cases therein cited. … In Belford v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • First Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. Casteel

    137 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1929

    In Horstman v. … Bank v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Buehl v. American Indemnity Co.

    72 Okla. 95 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1919

    The opinion cites in its support Cook v. Challiss, 55 Kan. 363 , 40 Pac. 643 . The rule annunced in Walcher v. Stone, supra, was followed in Manley v. Halsell, 43 Okla. 402 , 143 Pac. 193 . … In Blitz v. Brown, 7 Wall. 693 , 19 L. Ed. 280 , there was only a ■blank form of authentication to the transcript filed, without the seal of the court be•low or the signature of its clerk.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Voightlander v. State Ex Rel. Barnett

    175 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935

    W. 826 ; Pike v. Emerson, 5 N. H. 393, 22 Am. Dec. 468 ; Stevenson v. Felton, 99 N. C. 58 , 5 S. E. 399 ; Brown v. Pechman, 5 S. C. 555, 33 S. E. 732 ; Ish v. Crane, 13 Ohio St. Rep. 574 . … In the case of Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Jones' Adoption

    199 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1947

    Under such circumstances, as stated in Durham v. … Brown, 164 Okla. 139 , 24 P. 2d 295 , it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but this court may reverse and remand the cause, with directions

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Nitrogen Co. v. Lucas

    655 P.2d 1031 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1982

    The Board of Tax-roll Corrections denied the request. *1032 Appellant then brought its action in the trial court seeking relief under 68 O.S.1974 § 2479. … In denying appellant’s claim for refund, the court relied on the case of Cantrell v. Sanders, 610 P.2d 227 (1980), where an improper ratio was also at issue.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Hensley

    560 P.2d 567 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1977

    In State ex rel Oklahoma Bar Ass’n. v. … LAVENDER, V. C.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Pinkston

    420 P.2d 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1966

    Co. v. Brown, 112 Okl. 1 , 239 P. 599 ; Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Groves, 20 Okl. 101 , 93 P. 755 , 22 L.R.A.,N.S., 802. In Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Krieger v. Consolidated Dist. No. 2, Vanoss

    205 Okla. 18 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1951

    In Locke v. … In Weideman v. Staheli, 88 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Texas Co. v. Collins

    42 Okla. 374 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1914

    Co. v. … “In Dewey Portland Cement Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re Oklahoma Development Finance Authority

    89 P.3d 1075 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 2004

    Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 1997 OK 117 , 946 P.2d 1140 , a qui tam action, we heard a challenge to the city's expenditure of public fund to induce a private land trust to lease land to a retailer. … FENT V.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Townley Dairy Farms v. Greenwood

    321 P.2d 704 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1957

    Board of Com’rs of Lincoln County, 195 Okl. 400 , 158 P.2d 341 ; Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. Van Dusen, supra; Dalton Barnard Hardware Co. v. Gates, 203 Okl. 268 , 220 P.2d 249 ; and Fetteroff v. … In Renner v. Board of Com’rs of Lincoln County, supra, claimant was employed by the highway department of that county.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gould v. Smith

    405 P.2d 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1965

    Smith v. Bruner’s Guardianship, supra. Also see the third paragraph of the syllabus of In re Fox’ Estate (Warren v. Green), supra. Parker et al. v. … Brown v. Brown et al., Okl., 355 P.2d 1034 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Caywood v. Caywood

    541 P.2d 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1975

    Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, 189 Okl. 286 , 116 P.2d 700 (1941); Oklahoma City v. Prieto, supra. … J., HODGES, V. C. J., and DAVISON, IRWIN, BERRY, BARNES and SIMMS, JJ., concur. 1 . Laws Thirty-Fifth Legislature, First Regular Session-1975, Oh. 350 H.B. No. 1314. 2 . Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Protest of Midland Valley Railroad

    167 Okla. 327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1934

    Hatfield v. Moreland, 152 Okla. 37 , 3 P. (2d) 803 , and Faught v. … Co. v. Goad, Co. Treas., 117 Okla. 129 , 245 P. 617 ; In re Gypsy Oil Co., 141 Okla. 291 , 285 P. 67 , and Going, Co. Treas., v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

    143 Okla. 170 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1930

    This is an appeal from tbe judgment of tbe Court of Tax Review sustaining tbe protest of tbe Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company against the rate of tax levy fixed by the excise board of Coal county for the sinking … Van Arsdale v. Olustee School District, 23 Okla. 894 , 101 Pac. 1121 ; City of Sulphur v. State ex rel. Lankford, 62 Okla. 312 , 162 Pac. 744 , and Hamilton Tp. v. Okmulgee County,, 81 Okla. 256 , 198 Pac. 300 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. Williams

    30 Okla. 726 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1912

    Norton, 22 Kan. 374 ; Brown v. Hadley, 43 Kan. 267 , 23 Pac. 492 ; Town Co. v. Lincoln, 56 Kan. 145 , 42 Pac. 706 . In the case of Williams v. … E. 291 ; Brown v. Hadley, 43 Kan. 267 , 23 Pac. 492 ; Hoge v. Norton, 22 Kan. 374 ; Hadley v. Baxendale, 9 Exch. 341; 26 Eng. L. & Eq. 398 (a leading case both in England and America); Tootle v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Berryman v. Howell

    194 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1944

    McCoy v. Hall, 191 Okla. 311 , 131 P. 2d 60 . a. The statute, 70 O. … In School District No. 37 v. Latimer, 190 Okla. 620 , 126 P. 2d 280 , we sustained the statute as against an attack on certain constitutional grounds. Judgment affirmed. CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.