Case law

Lingerfelt v. Winn-Dixie Texas, Inc.

645 P.2d 485 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1982

Rogers v. Hennessee, 602 P.2d 1033 (Okl.1979). … Fuller v. Rahill, 496 P.2d 785 (Okl.1972). Kassick v. Spicer, 490 P.2d 251 (Okl.1971). . 390 P.2d at 521 . . 85 A.L.R.3d 1000 . . Testimony of Raymond Brown, co-manager of defendant: “Q.

Hisaw v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co.

197 Okla. 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1946

Oklahoma City v. Lycan, 193 Okla. 170 , 141 P. 2d 1013 ; Henry Chevrolet Co. v. Taylor, 188 Okla. 380 , 108 P. 2d 1024 ; Hale-Halsell Co. v. Webb, 184 Okla. 589 , 89 P. 2d 273 . … In Constant v. Brown, supra, and in Westlake v. Cole, 115 Okla. 109 , 241 P. 809 , and Yellow Taxicab & Baggage Co. v.

Lowrey v. Le Flore

48 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1915

Having the same question before it, the Supreme Court of Nebraska, in Brown v. Brown, 71 Neb. 209 , 98 N. W. 721 , 115 Am. St. Rep. 576 , 8 Ann. … Falter, v. J. C.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Byrams

275 P.3d 129 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 2012

Fent v. Contingency Review Board, 2007 OK 27, ¶ 7 , 163 P.3d 512, 519-520 . In essence, a plaintiff who has not suffered an injury attributable to the defendant lacks standing to bring a suit. … Lujan v.

Halsell v. Renfrow

14 Okla. 674 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1904

(Steele v. Fife, 48 Iowa, 99 ; Grant v. Leran, 4 Penn. St. 393; Weir v. Batdorf, 38 N. M. 22; Day v. LaCasse, 27 Atl. *689 [Me.] 124; Parker v. Parker, 67 Mass. 409 ; Comer v. Baldwin, 16 Minn. 172 ; Johnson v. … Townsend, v. Vanderwerker, 160 U. S. 171 ; Neale v. Neales, & Wall. 1; Brown v. Sutton, 129 U. S. 238 . Mr. Justice Brown in the case of Townsend v.

PARSONS v. DISTRICT COURT OF PUSHMATAHA COUNTY

2017 OK 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 2017

OSCN Found Document:PARSONS v. … Rogers v.

Ynclan v. Woodward

237 P.3d 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 2010

Franks, see note 8, supra; Kitchens v. Kitchens, see note 8, supra; Brown v. Brown, see note 8, supra; Knott v. Knott, 418 N.W.2d 505, 509 (Minn.App.1988); Wright v. Wright, 279 Mich. … In re Whitaker, 36 Ohio St.3d 213 , 522 N.E.2d 563, 568-69 (1988); Brown v. Burch, 30 Va.

Merry v. Industrial Bldg. & Loan Ass'n

138 Okla. 240 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1929

In the case of Vann v. … Brown v. Oklahoma City, 107 Okla. 252 , 231 Pac. 855 . Where proceedings in error are by trans-script of the record, the transcript must be certified as such by the clerk of the trial court. State ex rel. Freeling v.

Tull v. Milligan

173 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1935

Brown, which assignment was duly recorded the same year. The plaintiffs offer in evidence a release of this mortgage by Anna M. Brown. … Herndon v. Board of County Commissioners, 158 Okla. 14 , 11 P. (2d) 939 ; Govan v. McCord, 155 Okla. 278 , 11 P. (2d) 141 ; Schuster v. McDaniel, 156 Okla. 233 , 10 P. (2d) 391 .

Town of Medford Ex Rel. Fuss v. Early

194 Okla. 566 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1944

Tharel v. … McGrath v. Oklahoma City, 156 Okla. 34 , 9 P. 2d 711 ; Settle v. Frakes, 156 Okla. 53 , 9 P. 2d 768 ; Service Feed Co. v. City of Ardmore, 171 Okla. 155 , 42 P. 2d 853 , and Criswell, Co. Treas., v.

Little v. Lovett

193 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1943

See Brown v. Bassett, 191 Okla. 22 , 126 P. 2d 705 , and cases therein cited. … In Belford v.

Nichols v. Oklahoma City

195 Okla. 305 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 20, 1945

.- This is a proceeding on appeal from the board of the commissioners in condemnation proceeding. The award was for $16,730. The condemnee, G. A. … Co. v. Fowler, 113 Mo. 458 , 20 S.W. 1069 ; Ringle v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 59 N.J.L. 661 , 29 Atl. 483 ; Grand River Dam Authority v. Jarvis, 124 Fed. 2d 914. See, also, language by this court in Short v.

State Ex Rel. Read, Ins. v. Midwest Mutual Burial Ass'n

176 Okla. 468 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1936

In the case of Board of Commissioners of Logan County v. … State v. Butler, 70 Fla 102, 69 So. 771 : Mugge v. Warnell, etc., Co., 58 Fla. 318 , 50 So. 645 ; Brown v Lakeland, 61 Fla. 508 , 54 So. 716 ; State v. Greer, 88 Fla. 249 , 102 So. 739 ; 37 A. L. R. 1298; Getzen v.

Berryman v. Howell

194 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1944

McCoy v. Hall, 191 Okla. 311 , 131 P. 2d 60 . a. The statute, 70 O. … In School District No. 37 v. Latimer, 190 Okla. 620 , 126 P. 2d 280 , we sustained the statute as against an attack on certain constitutional grounds. Judgment affirmed. CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C.

State Ex Rel. Schuman v. O'Bannon

181 Okla. 413 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1937

In the case of Jones v. … Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 P. 227 , and Ragan v. Shannon, 98 Okla. 289 , 225 P. 672 .

Bankers Union Life Ins. Co. v. Read

182 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1938

J., v. … In construing these stat *106 utes we follow the general rules of construction as stated in the syllabus in the case of Board of Com’rs of Nye County v.

In re Gypsy Oil Co.

142 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

In Pitts v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee, 138 Okla. 284 , 281 Pac. 133 , this court said: “Every municipality must submit its budget to the excise board of their respective counties. City of Sapulpa v. … Schulte v. Board of County Commissioners, 119 Okla. 261 , 250 Pac. 123 . The question then arises as to the effect of the funding judgments.

Humphrey v. Selected Investments Corp.

206 Okla. 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1952

Co. v. … In Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown, 170 Okla. 210 , 39 P. 2d 150 , we held that the question of defect of parties could not be raised for the first time in a motion for new trial, and in Muzny v.

Capps v. Vasey Bros.

23 Okla. 554 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1910

In the case of Harlan et al. v. Brown, 4 Ind. App. 319 , 30 N. … In the case of Pierson v. Townsend et al., 2 Hill (N.

Hancock v. Little

199 Okla. 256 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1947

Under such circumstances, as stated by this court in Durham v. … Brown, 164 Okla. 139 , 24 P. 2d 295 , it is not the duty of this court to search the record to find some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause may be reversed and remanded, with directions