Case law

Rogers v. Meiser

74 O.B.A.J. 967 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 2003

See Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., supra, 833 P.2d at 1225 -1226 and £.n.36. … Brown v.

Appeal of Crescent Precision Products, Inc.

516 P.2d 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1973

Constitutional Law § 48; Latting v. Cordell, 197 Okl. 369 , 172 P.2d 397, 399 ; 16 Am.Jur.2d Constitutional Law, § 94, 51 Am.Jur. Taxation, § 500. … See, for instance, Board of Com’rs of Comanche County v.

Brocker, Adm'r v. Stallard

34 Okla. 612 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1912

In Brown v. … In Gutziet v.

Comanche County v. American Nat. Bank of Lawton

122 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Ryan, 107 Okla. 278 . 232 Pac. 834 . … Bank v. Britton, 105 U. S. 322, 324 , 20 L.

Of School District No. 9 v. Jones

193 Okla. 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1943

See Harris et al. v. District Court in and for Nowata County, 68 Okla. 231 , 173 P. 69 ; House et al. v. Musick, County Superintendent of Public Instruction, 185 Okla. 264 , 91 P. 2d 676 . … 'The proceedings on the return are confined solely to the record of the lower court or tribunal. *13 See Southern National Bank v. Wallace, 63 Okla. 206 , 164 P. 461 ; Lennon v.

In Re Assessment of First Nat. Bank of Chickasha

58 Okla. 508 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1916

Laws 1915, the bank prosecuted its appeal to the district court of Grady county, where the action of the county board was reversed, and said board was directed to deduct from the valuation of the bank the amount invested … From the order and judgment of the district court, the county board of equalization, and the board of county commissioners of Grady county, and the State of Oklahoma, have appealed to this court.

STEVENS v. FOX

383 P.3d 269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 2016

In Board of Trustees of Judicial Form Retirement System v. … Board of Trustees of Judicial Form Retirement System v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, 132 S.W.3d 770, 778 (Ky. 2003). (Emphasis added).

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Richardson

273 P.3d 50 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 2012

Fent v. Contingency Review Board, 2007 OK 27, ¶ 7 , 163 P.3d 512, 519-520 . In essence, a plaintiff who has not suffered an injury attributable to the defendant lacks standing to bring a suit. … Lujan v.

BOLER v. SECURITY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.

2014 OK 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2014

Brown and Root, Inc., 1992 OK 114 , ¶ 13, 836 P.2d 1298, 1301 . See also Haws v. Luethje, 1972 OK 146, ¶ 13 , 503 P.2d 871 . … See Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, __ U.S. __, 132 S.Ct. 1201 , 182 L.Ed.2d 42 (2012)(per curiam).

Application of Devilliers

527 P.2d 1139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1974

This required the Board of Governors to strike him from the membership roll. … This resulted in another opinion being issued by the Tenth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals, Atlas Corporation v. DeVilliers, 447 F.2d 799 (1971).

Liberty Central Trust Co. v. Methodist Episcopal Church

201 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1948

of Trustees is the testimony of the writer that he thought the Board authorized him to write it. … Agency, 252, §315; Incorporated Town of Locust Grove v. Faull, 174 Okla. 466 , 50 P. 2d 1122 .

In Re Humphrey's Estate

193 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1943

Among ' the cases so cited are Whitaker’s Estate, 175 Pa. 139 , 34 Atl. 572 ; Moore v. Ranken, 172 N. C. 599 , 90 S. E. 759 ; Witherspoon v. Jernigan, 97 Tex. 98 , 76 S. W. 445 , and Broward v. … J. p. 836, § 62; In re Way’s Estate, Love v. Brown, 29 Cal. A. 2d 669, 85 P. 2d 563 ; In re Way’s Estate, Love v. Jackson, 29 Cal. A. 2d 677, 85 P. 2d 567 ; Draper v. Draper, 174 Tenn. 394 , 126 S. W. 2d 307 .

Murphy v. Walkup

258 P.2d 922 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1953

Hankins, 195 Okl. 632 , 159 P.2d 1013 ; Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okl. 170 , 192 P. 417 , unless, of course, such view was rendered untenable by the judgment roll. In this connection see Davis v. Rowland, supra. … In this connection see Green v. Campbell, 187 Okl. 54 , 100 P.2d 997 ; Glenn v. Lewis, 10 Cir., 105 F.2d 398 ; Kirby v. Parker, D.C., 58 F. Supp. 309 , and other authorities cited in Brown v.

Tull v. Milligan

173 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1935

Brown, which assignment was duly recorded the same year. The plaintiffs offer in evidence a release of this mortgage by Anna M. Brown. … Herndon v. Board of County Commissioners, 158 Okla. 14 , 11 P. (2d) 939 ; Govan v. McCord, 155 Okla. 278 , 11 P. (2d) 141 ; Schuster v. McDaniel, 156 Okla. 233 , 10 P. (2d) 391 .

Price v. Christian

373 P.2d 1017 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1962

instead of the Secretary of the Election Board. … Coe v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 356 , 221 P.2d 774 ; Cornell v. McAlister, 121 Okl. 285 , 249 P. 959 .

In Re Williams

174 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1935

It has been said (Hunter v. Troup, 315 Ill. 293 , 146 N. … OSBORN, V. C. .T., and RILEY, PHELPS. CORN, and GIBSON. ,T.T„ concur. BUSBY and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Adams Royalty Co. v. Faulkner

176 Okla. 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1936

In Brown v. … Brown v. Rhodes, 1 Kan. 359 ; Gallaher v. Southwood, Id. 143; Lownsberry v. Rakestraw, 14 Kan. 151 -154; State v. Bohan, 19 Kan. 48 . “The rule prescribed by the statute is a reasonable one.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Box

48 Okla. 402 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1915

Co. v. Davis & Young, 26 Okla. 359 , 109 Pac. 551 ; A., T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Hender son, 27 Okla. 560 , 112 Pac. 986 ; A., T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Ward, 32 Okla. 187 , 120 Pac. 982 ; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. … Brown, 32 Okla. 483 , 122 Pac. 136 ; M., K. & T. R. Co. v. Savage, 32 Okla. 376 , 122 Pac. 656 ; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Smith, 41 Okla. 314 , 137 Pac. 357 ; C., R. I. & P. R. Co. v.

Turner v. Ford

183 Okla. 567 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1938

Fain Drilling Co. v. Deatherage, 179 Okla. 409 , 65 P.2d 1212 ; Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 P. 785 . … In Texas Co. v.

Denver Producing & Refining Co. v. State

199 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 14, 1947

.- They assert such a position is unlawful under the statute and Corporation Commission rule above and amounted to inequitable conduct under our decisions, Amis v. Bryan Pet. … Corp., 185 Okla. 206 , 90 P. 2d 936 ; Cooke v. Westgate-Greenland Oil Co. et al., 185 Okla. 209 , 90 P. 2d 940 ; Thompson et al. v.