Case law

In Re Daniel's Omitted Property

108 Okla. 195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1924

Justice Kane said in Anderson v. … The state has cited the opinion of a divided .court in the case of State v.

Oklahoma Education Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Legislature

158 P.3d 1058 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 2007

The school districts and their boards are but the *1065 vehicles which the Legislature uses to carry out this constitutional duty. 26 A school board's powers and duties are restricted to those expressly granted, fairly implied … The State Public Common School Building Equalization Fund shall be administered by the State Board of Education, until otherwise provided by the Legislature.

Hamrick v. George

378 P.2d 324 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1963

Board of Ed., City of Tulsa, v. Morley et al., 168 Okl. 259 , 34 P.2d 258 . … Also, in Excise Board of Washita County v.

G. A. Martin Lumber Co. v. Forsythe

21 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1908

Sharp v. Johnson, 22 Ark. 80 ; Taylor v. Spears, 8 Ark. 429 ; Brown v. Woolsey, 2 Ind. T. 329 , 51 S. W. 965 ; Truskett v. Bronaugh, 4 Ind. T. 731 , 76 S. W. 294 .

Hall v. Black

93 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1923

Brown v. Holmes, 21 Kan. 687 ; Danforth v. Pratt, 42 Me. 5 ; Weber v. Stone. 53 Neb. 371 . … This position assumed by this court and laid down by Cyc. is amply supported in Becker v. Brown, 65 Neb. 204 , 93 N. W. 178 ; Allen v. Spencer, 1 Edm. Sel. Cas. (N. Y.) 117; Scott v. Nesbit, 14 Ves. Jr. 439; 9 Rev.

Noble Bros. v. Ballew

59 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

was, by the court, sustained, over the objection of counsel for the plaintiffs, and exceptions duly saved, and the jury, under the instructions of the court, returned a verdict for the defendant for the recovery of the brown … Kan., v. Stephenson et al., 23 Okla. 695 102 Pac. 992 ; Bohannon v. Jennings, 31 Okla. 254 , 121 Pac. 195 ; McKinney v. Purcell, 28 Kan. 446 . In this connection see the case of Hamill et al. v.

Creekmore v. City of Tulsa

139 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1929

In the case of Joseph Brown, Adm’r, v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. … Co. v. School Board of School Dist.

Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. City of Oklahoma v. Robertson

19 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

Werner v. Washington, 29 Fed. Cases, 705; Lessburg v. Putman, 103 Ga. 110 ; Woods v. Commonwealth, 40 Ky. 74 ; Yankton v. Douglass, 8 S. D. 441; Morrison v. Commonwealth, 37 Ky. 218 ; Patten v. … and obtained from such board a license; and provided further, that ho license shall run for a longer period than the license granted by such board; and the revocation of the county license by the board of county commissioners

Nelson v. Ponca City, Kay County

408 P.2d 532 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1965

Then they cite, and quote from, Grier v. City of Tulsa, 143 Okl. 244 , 288 P. 957 , and City of Tulsa v. … JACKSON, V. C. J., and IRWIN and HODGES, JJ., dissent.

Price v. Christian

373 P.2d 1017 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1962

instead of the Secretary of the Election Board. … Coe v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 356 , 221 P.2d 774 ; Cornell v. McAlister, 121 Okl. 285 , 249 P. 959 .

Autry v. Choate

193 Okla. 265 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1943

The contention, then, that the sale was not held in the place as required by law and as advertised in the notice of sale is settled by the holding of this court in the case of Cherryhomes v. … GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, WELCH, HURST,. DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. BAYLESS, J., absent.

In Re Greenwood

321 P.2d 704 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1957

Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County, 195 Okl. 400 , 158 P.2d 341 ; Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Van Dusen, supra; Dalton Barnard Hardware Co. v. Gates, 203 Okl. 268 , 220 P.2d 249 ; and Fetteroff v. … In Renner v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County, supra, claimant was employed by the highway department of that county.

Hourigan v. Home State Bank

62 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1917

V. … Hardwick et al. v. Atkinson, 8 Okla. 608 , 58 Pac. 747 ; First National Bank of Bristow v. Rogers, 24 Okla. 357 , 103 Pac. 582 ; Smith Premier-Typewriter Co. v.

Parks v. State Industrial Commission

182 Okla. 413 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1938

The first is Brown Bros. v. Parks, 155 Okla. 16 , 7 P.2d 898 ; the second, Parks v. Brown Brothers, 166 Okla. 204 , 26 P.2d 925 ; and the third, Brown Bros. v. Parks, 176 Okla. 615 , 56 P.2d 883 .

Roberts v. Paschall

192 Okla. 673 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1943

Appropriate pleadings were filed on behalf of the county treasurer and board of county commissioners. … See, also, Blakeney v. Ashford, 183 Okla. 213 , 81 P. 2d 309 , and numerous cases cited therein.

Pierce Oil Corporation v. Myers

117 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1926

Co. v. … To the same effect, is the case of McDonald v.

Kerr v. Luttrell

143 Okla. 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1930

In the case of Dove v. … Also, in Dancy v.

Kurn v. Immel

184 Okla. 571 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1939

In the case of Champlin Refining Co. v. … Railroad Co. v. Webb, 46 Okla. 740 , 148 P. 1042 ; Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf R. Co. v. Brown, 46 Okla. 735 , 148 P. 1040 ; Box v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 56 Okla. 243 , 155 P. 1144 ; Brei v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.

ROBINSON v. FAIRVIEW FELLOWSHIP HOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS, INC.

371 P.3d 477 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 2016

Stilwell Trucking Contractor v. … Cline v. Okla. Coal. for Reprod.

Texas Co. v. Forson

196 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1946

Brown v. Higby, 191 Okla. 173 , 127 P. 2d 195 . We think this first finding of the trial court is not reasonably sustained by the evidence and is contrary to law. … Brown & Sons State Bank v. Polen, 132 Okla. 121 , 270 P. 9 ; Wilson & Company v.