Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.62s

  • Williams v. Taylor

    190 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1941

    In O’Mealey, Adm’r, v. … In Pasley v. Union National Bank of Bartlesville, 137 Okla. 171 , 278 P. 621 ; Osage County Motor Co. v. Pappin, 139 Okla. 23 , 281 P. 217 , and in Dial v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Oklahoma Nat. Life Ins. Co.

    68 Okla. 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1918

    Home Savings Bank v. City of Des Moines, 205 U. S. 503 , 27 Sup. Ct. 571, 51 L. Ed. 901 : 37 Cyc. 1028. See, also, notes to State Board of Equalization v. People, 58 L. R. A. 513, and State of N. C. v. … Co. v. Lott, 54 Ala. 499 ; Equitable Life Ins. Co. v. Board of Equalization. 74 Iowa, 178 . 37 N. W. 141 ; Michigan Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Detroit Council, 133 Mich. 408 , 95 N. W. 1131 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Zaharias v. Gammill

    844 P.2d 137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1993

    In Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74 (Okla.1986), this Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 (1977) description of the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. … Plante v. Engel, 124 N.H. 213 , 469 A.2d 1299 , 49 A.L.R.4th 1 (N.H.1983). See also Eddy v. Brown, supra (intentional infliction of emotional distress is an independent tort).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Texas Co. v. Forson

    196 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1946

    Brown v. Higby, 191 Okla. 173 , 127 P. 2d 195 . We think this first finding of the trial court is not reasonably sustained by the evidence and is contrary to law. … Brown & Sons State Bank v. Polen, 132 Okla. 121 , 270 P. 9 ; Wilson & Company v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Doctors' Oil Co. v. Adair

    83 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1921

    Thomason, County Treasurer, v. Board of Com’rs of Delaware County, 56 Okla. 79 , 155 Pac. 881 ; Parrish v. School District No. 19, 68 Oklahoma, 171 Pac. 461 ; Killough v. Ft. Supply Tel.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of State

    26 Okla. 403 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1910

    State Board of Examiners, 19 Utah, 18 , 57 Pac. 175 , the State Board of Examiners refused to receive, audit, and allow certain claims which it had been directed to do by statute of the territory of TJtah. … Cranmer v.

    Criticized on other grounds by In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642, 65 O.B.A.J. 3225 (1992)Cited 79 timesPublished
  • Fairbanks Co. v. City of Sulphur

    62 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1916

    See Johnson v. Board, 7 Okla. 686 , 56 Pac. 701 ; Board of County Com’rs v. De Lana, 8 Okla. 215 , 57 Pac. 162 . … Buxton & Skinner Stationery Co. v. Board of Com’rs, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 Pac. 215 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mustain v. Grand River Dam Authority

    68 P.3d 991 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 2003

    Myers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 2002 OK 60, ¶ 9 , 52 P.3d 1014, 1018 . 13 . Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22 , 989 P.2d 448, 455-56 . 14 . Russell v. … Dept. of Public Safety, 1983 OK 34, ¶ 15 , 662 P.2d 299, 302 ; (citing Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose J. College, 1978 OK 129 , 586 P.2d 1098 (1978)). 46 . Beavin, supra note 45 at ¶ 15 at 302. 47 .

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Stockett v. Steele, Adm'r

    197 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1946

    Co. v. … Harris v. Elliott, 178 Okla. 98 , 61 P. 2d 1089 ; Kennedy v. Raby, 174 Okla. 332 , 50 P. 2d 716 . In Kennedy v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Prince

    191 Okla. 551 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1942

    In Davenport v. … CORN, V. C. J., and HURST, J., dissent. RILEY, J., absent.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ethics Commission v. Cullison

    64 O.B.A.J. 978 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1993

    Swezey v. Fisher, 484 P.2d 501, 503 (Okla.1971). See also Moore-Norman Area Vocational Tech. Sch. Dist. v. Board of Trustees, 519 P.2d 497 (Okla.1974). … See Board of Commissioners of Marshall County v. Shaw, 199 Okl. 66 , 182 P.2d 507 (1947); Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368 , 56 P.2d 136 (1936). .

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Carter Oil Co. v. Tiffin

    74 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1918

    v. … The provisions in the lease under consideration and the controlling facts in this case are identical with those of the case of Northwestern Oil & Gas Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Comanche County v. American Nat. Bank of Lawton

    122 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

    Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Ryan, 107 Okla. 278 . 232 Pac. 834 . … Bank v. Britton, 105 U. S. 322, 324 , 20 L.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Carpenter v. Russell

    13 Okla. 277 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

    Board of Brant County, 8 Okla. 229 ; Wood v. Taylor et al., 8 Okla. 625 ; Petrie v. Coulter, 10 Okla. 257 ; McClung v. Penny, 11 Okla. 474 ; Stahl v. Wade, 11 Okla. 483 , and Randolph v. … This was the view the conrt expressed when it dismissed the case of Ward et al. v. The Board of County Commissioners of Logan County.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Davis v. GHS Health Maintenance Organization, Inc.

    72 O.B.A.J. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 2001

    (c) Participants covered by the plans of the Board shall use the Board's grievance procedure. … Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff's Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 188 v. Board of County Comm'rs of Tulsa County, 1998 OK 44 , ¶ 13, 959 P.2d 979 ; Carter v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Crescent Precision Products, Inc.

    516 P.2d 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1973

    Constitutional Law § 48; Latting v. Cordell, 197 Okl. 369 , 172 P.2d 397, 399 ; 16 Am.Jur.2d Constitutional Law, § 94, 51 Am.Jur. Taxation, § 500. … See, for instance, Board of Com’rs of Comanche County v.

    Overruled in part by Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Ass'n v. Youngker, 1988 Okla. LEXIS 162 (1988)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Young v. Dyer

    149 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1931

    CLARK, V. C. J. This cause presents error from the district court of Carter county, wherein plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and defendants in error were defendants. … purchaser and his heirs a right in fee simple to such lot or lots, for the sole purpose of interment, under the regulations of the council or town board or board of cemetery trustees.’’

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Williams

    174 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1935

    It has been said (Hunter v. Troup, 315 Ill. 293 , 146 N. … OSBORN, V. C. .T., and RILEY, PHELPS. CORN, and GIBSON. ,T.T„ concur. BUSBY and WELCH, JJ., absent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nichols v. Bonaparte

    171 Okla. 234 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1935

    This was held as early as Stark Bros. v. Glaser et al., 19 Okla. 502 , 91 P. 1040 , and as late as Vacuum Oil Co. v. Brett, 150 Okla. 153 , 300 P. 632 . Many other cases could be cited so holding. … In Blake et al. v. Baker, Co.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Sun Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

    620 P.2d 896 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1980

    In Phiüips v. … See also Board of Education of Passaic v. Board of Education of Twp. of Wayne, 120 N.J.Super. 155 , 293 A.2d 445 ; and In Re Estate of Lytle, 40 Ohio Misc. 36 , 318 N.E.2d 880 (1974); 70 C.J.S. Payment § 156.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.