Case law

Thompson v. Stanley

183 Okla. 445 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1938

In Caddo County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. … These decisions are further supported by the decisions of this court in Wade v. Board of Com’rs of Harmon County, 161 Okla. 245 , 17 P.2d 690 ; Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry.

Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v. City of Enid

179 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1937

The record discloses that for the fiscal year in question the defendant city made, and the excise board approved, an estimate of $13,733 for electric current and fuel. … Both of these propositions have been decided adversely to plaintiff’s contention in Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. City of Tulsa, 174 Okla. 58 , 50 P. (2d) 166 .

State v. Lonewolf

63 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1917

Gergens v. McCollum, 27 Okla. 155 , 111 Pac. 208 ; Hassell v. Morgan et al., 27 Okla. 453 , 112 Pac. 969 ; Conwill v. Eldridge, 35 Okla. 537 , 130 Pac. 912 ; Gaar-Scott Co. v. Rogers. 46 Okla. 67 , 148 Pac, 161 . … v.

Burke v. Oklahoma City

350 P.2d 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1960

See also Arthur v. Board of Com’rs of Choctaw County, 43 Okl. 174 , 141 P. 1 ; Seba v. Independent School District No. 3 of Dewey County, 208 Okl. 83 , 253 P.2d 559 ; Bilby v. … While the case was on appeal Emma Herman submitted a proposition to the the Board of Park Commissioners that if the Board would take only certain parts of the premises sought and release the remainder of the property and

Badgett v. Oklahoma Life Ins. Co.

176 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935

Brown et al. v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 P. 173 . … Brown et al. v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 P. 173 .

Giles v. Doggett

500 P.2d 574 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1972

McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 , 45 S. Ct. 16, 17 , 69 L.Ed. 158, 161 (1924); Rice v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 208 Okl. 440 , 257 P.2d 292 (1953); Layman v. … State Board of Medical Examiners, 208 Okl. 440 , 257 P.2d 292 (1953), the State Board of Medical Examiners sought to enjoin Rice from practicing medicine without a license.

Maben v. Rosser

24 Okla. 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1909

The statute gave to the board of commissioners the arbitrary power to remove the inspector. Under such authority they attempted to exercise the power of indefinite suspension. In State v. … In State v.

New Amsterdam Casualty Co v. Clark's Estate

104 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1924

In Donnell et al. v. Dansby et al., 58 Okla. 165 , 159 Pac. 317 , it is said: “* « * The father was entitled to the custody, services, and earnings of plaintiffs during their minority (section 4368, Rev. … To have entitled him to credit, the expenditures must have been made under- the direction of the cóunty court, and no claim is made that such authority was obtained.* * *" In Hutson v. Jenson, 110 Wis. 26 , 85 N.

Hankins v. District Court of Jackson County

424 P.2d 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1967

Brown, 100 Cal. 626 , 35 P. 323 , and Brown v.. Campbell, 100 Cal. 635 , 35 P. 433 , 38 Am.St.Rep. 314 , described in Footnote 17, page 988 (of the A.L.R.2d citation). Under the theory then of Lewis v. … The case of Stafford v. Powell, Tex.Civ.

Bass Harbour Furniture and Carpet Co. v. Harbour

42 Okla. 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1914

McCloskey v. Davis, 8 Ind. App. 190 , 35 N. E. 187 ; Central of Ga. Ry. v. Morgan, 110 Ga. 168 , 35 S. E. 345 ; Railway Co. v. Thomason, 59 Ark. 140 , 26 S. W. 598 ; Douglass v. Hill, 29 Kan. 527. … Allison v. Bryan, 26 Okla. 520 , 109 Pac. 934 .

Hourigan v. Home State Bank

62 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1917

V. … Hardwick et al. v. Atkinson, 8 Okla. 608 , 58 Pac. 747 ; First National Bank of Bristow v. Rogers, 24 Okla. 357 , 103 Pac. 582 ; Smith Premier-Typewriter Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Corp. Commission v. Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n

62 O.B.A.J. 2078 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1991

In Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. … Corporation Commission, 438 P.2d 495, 498 (Okl.1968); Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 695 P.2d 498 (Okl.1984). 28 . 82 O.S.1981, § 1020.8. That section provides, in part: "...

In Re Assessment of First Nat. Bank of Chickasha

58 Okla. 508 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1916

Laws 1915, the bank prosecuted its appeal to the district court of Grady county, where the action of the county board was reversed, and said board was directed to deduct from the valuation of the bank the amount invested … From the order and judgment of the district court, the county board of equalization, and the board of county commissioners of Grady county, and the State of Oklahoma, have appealed to this court.

State Ex Rel. Clifton v. Reeser

543 P.2d 1379 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1975

Reed v. Kuzirian, 228 Or. 619, 365 P.2d 1046 , 88 A.L.R.2d 1284 (1961), Fields v. District of Columbia, 232 A.2d 300 (D.C.App.1967) and New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. … See Wenke v. Hitchcock, 6 Cal.3d 746 , 100 Cal.Rptr. 290 , 493 P.2d 1154 (1972), Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections of Tulsa County, 510 P.2d 680 (Okl.1973), Jones v.

Jones v. Pugh

130 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 1928

Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 ; Hirsh v. Twyford, 40 Okla. 220 , 139 Pac. 313 ; State ex rel. Mays v. Breckenridge, 43 Okla. 711 , 142 Pac. 407 ; Taylor v. Freeman, 76 Okla. 211 , 184 Pac. 761 . … In the case of Baker v.

Garrett v. London

107 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1924

In Ledbetter v. Kimsey, 38 Okla. 671 , 134 Pac. 868 , this court says: “Under the rule announced in Martin v. … Wasson v. Taylor, 50 Ohio St. Rep. 130 ; State ex rel. Daniels v. Bieler, 87 Ind. 520 ; Harrison v. Greaves, 59 Miss. 453 ; Miller et al. v. Town of Palermo, 12 Kan. 14 .

Creekmore v. City of Tulsa

139 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1929

In the case of Joseph Brown, Adm’r, v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. … Co. v. School Board of School Dist.

Bodine v. Johnson

101 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1924

The case was begun in the district court to enjoin the school board from issuing said bonds, and was tried before the ' Hon. Warren K. … In McGee v. Franklin Pub. Co. (Tex.) 39 S.

Merrell v. Merrell

712 P.2d 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 24, 1985

Additionally, respondent points out that this Court in Wade v. … See R.N.T. v. J.R.G., 666 P.2d 1036 (Alaska 1983); Loveless v. May, 278 Ark. 127 , 644 S.W.2d 261 (1983). 10 . See Adoption of Rapp, 348 So.2d 107 (La.App. 1977); D'Augustine v.

Robinson Oil Corp. v. Davis

171 Okla. 557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1935

Endicott v. Triple State Natural Gas & Oil Co. (Ky.) 76 S. W. 516 . … Egan v. First National Bank of Tulsa, 67 Okla. 168 , 169 P. 621 ; Hale et al. v. Streeter, 91 Okla. 107 , 216 P. 154 ; Teters v. Frost, 145 Okla. 273 , 292 P. 356 .