Case law

Stark v. Akard

313 P.2d 790 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1957

Scott, Okl., 269 P.2d 779, and Kapp v. … Colonial Royalties Co. v. Sitler, Okl., 298 P.2d 1060, 1061 . See also similar holding in Jackson v. Allen, Okl., 283 P.2d 839 . Collier v.

Stone v. Stone

66 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1917

The plaintiffs in error filed a counterclaim for board and lodging alleged to have been received by the defendant in error from them. … This court in the case of Lambert v.

Shields v. Marshall

202 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1949

ARNOLD, V. C. J. It appears from the record that in, 1940, W. H. … Shoffstall, the board of commissioners, the building inspector and the board of adjustment of the city of Tulsa to restrain and enjoin further proceedings in the matter of rezoning the above lots.

Southern Surety Co. v. Ruark

97 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

In Morrison State Bank v. … In the ease of Williams v.

Schuck v. Moore

48 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1915

Sproad v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230 , 54 Pac. 458 ; Denny v. Wright, 13 Okla. 256 , 74 Pac. 104 ; Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423 , 98 Pac. 341 ; Meadors v. Johnson, 27 Okla. 543 , 117 Pac. 198 ; Brown v. … Co. v. Fain, 34 Okla. 164 , 124 Pac. 70 . We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Wright v. Grove Sun Newspaper Co., Inc.

873 P.2d 983 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1994

Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., Okl., 833 P.2d 1218, 1225-26 (1992); Silver v. Slusher, Okl., 770 P.2d 878, 884 (1989); Ricks Exploration v. Okl. … See Eddy v. Brown, Okl., 715 P.2d 74, 76 (1986); Breeden v. League Services Corp., Okl., 575 P.2d 1374 (1978). . Eddy, supra note 33 ; Breeden, supra note 33 . . Eddy, supra note 33 . .

Town of Medford Ex Rel. Fuss v. Early

194 Okla. 566 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1944

Tharel v. … McGrath v. Oklahoma City, 156 Okla. 34 , 9 P. 2d 711 ; Settle v. Frakes, 156 Okla. 53 , 9 P. 2d 768 ; Service Feed Co. v. City of Ardmore, 171 Okla. 155 , 42 P. 2d 853 , and Criswell, Co. Treas., v.

Cardin Bldg. Co. v. Smith

125 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1927

In the case of Hurie v. … No other members of the board ctf directors were shown to have been disqualified.

First Nat. Bank of Sallisaw v. Ballard

41 Okla. 553 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1914

Rep. 64 ; Boynton v. Spafford, 61 Ill. App. 384 ; Kirkpatrick v. Howk, 80 Ill. 122 ; Stewart v. Davis, Ex’r, 18 Ind. 74 ; Bank of Monroe v. Gifford, 79 Iowa, 300 , 44 N. W. 558 ; Embree v. Strickland, 1 White & W. Civ. … App. sec. 1299; Holliday v. Brown, 33 Neb. 657 , 50 N. W. 1042 ; Pierce v. Atwood, 64 Neb. 92 , 89 N.

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Glass

69 O.B.A.J. 2148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1998

In Carmichael v. … Barry v.

Bankers Union Life Ins. Co. v. Read

182 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1938

J., v. … In construing these stat *106 utes we follow the general rules of construction as stated in the syllabus in the case of Board of Com’rs of Nye County v.

Ball v. Coyle

108 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1925

BRANSON, V. C. J. The appeal herein is from a judgment in the sum of $450 rendered in favor of one John Coyle, against J. E. Ball and L. L. Laws. … Coble v. Barringer (N. C.) 38 S. E. 518 ; Allison v. Thomas (Cal.) 14 Pac. 309 ; Sweet v. Brown (Mass.) 45 Am. Dec. 243 .

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hollis

28 Okla. 613 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

its answer, being entitled “Amended Answer,” in which it is specifically pleaded that upon the back of said telegram was a printed condition under which said message was received and transmitted, which was made by William Brown … Co. v. Lefevre, 40 S. W. (Tex. Civ. App.) 340; Hall v. Doyle, 35 Ark. 445 .

McLaughlin v. Nettleton

47 Okla. 407 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1915

Judgments rendered in somewhat similar circumstances were vacated upon the ground of unavoidable casualty in the following cases: Adams v. Rathbun, 14 S. D. 552, 86 N. W. 62 ; Simpkins v. … All the Justices concur, except BROWN, J., disqualified and not participating.

City of Okmulgee v. Young

189 Okla. 25 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1941

Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of Miami, 40 F. 2d 508 . But that is not this case. Plaintiff cites and relies upon City of Bloomington v. Citizens’ National Bank, 56 Ind. App. 446 , 105 N. E. 575 ; City of Gladstone v. … Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of Miami, supra, is a case where money in the separate, special, street improvement fund was converted to the benefit of the city, and is therefore not in point.

Hope v. Peck

38 Okla. 531 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1913

Brown et al. v. First National Bank, 35 Okla. 736 , 130 Pac. 140 ; Cook v. State et al., 35 Okla. 653 . 130 Pac. 300 . In Brooks et al. v. … Co. v. McKee, ante, 132 Pac. 497 . See, also, Marple v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Nat. Bank, 28 Okla. 810 , 115 Pac. 1124 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701 , 127 Pac. 478 .

Moore v. Oklahoma City

122 Okla. 234 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1927

In Moore v. … In People v.

Stewart v. Judge of the 15th Judicial District

542 P.2d 945 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1975

We dealt with our powers to vacate orders of administrative bodies in Board of Education of Dependent School District #32 v. … Oklahoma State Board of Education, 521 P.2d 390 (Okl. 1974), wherein the acts of the State Board of Education were vacated and set aside by mandamus. See State ex rel. Freeling v.

State Ex Rel. Adair County Com'rs v. McCloud

64 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1916

In Yan Trees v. … Hinton v.

PARSONS v. DISTRICT COURT OF PUSHMATAHA COUNTY

2017 OK 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 2017

OSCN Found Document:PARSONS v. … Rogers v.