Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.15s

  • In Re Grant

    172 Okla. 605 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

    The findings and recommendations, together with the transcript of the evidence and proceedings, were transmitted to the Board of Governors of the State Bar of Oklahoma, and. upon review, the Board of Governors approved the … McNEILE, O. ,T„ OSBOBN, V. O. .1., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, COBN, and GIBSON, JJ„ concur. WELCH, J., absent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shields v. Marshall

    202 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1949

    ARNOLD, V. C. J. It appears from the record that in, 1940, W. H. … Shoffstall, the board of commissioners, the building inspector and the board of adjustment of the city of Tulsa to restrain and enjoin further proceedings in the matter of rezoning the above lots.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Southern Surety Co. v. Ruark

    97 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

    In Morrison State Bank v. … In the ease of Williams v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cardin Bldg. Co. v. Smith

    125 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1927

    In the case of Hurie v. … No other members of the board ctf directors were shown to have been disqualified.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McCaffrey v. Owings

    110 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1925

    Swan v. Bailey, 71 Okla. 30 , 174 Pac. 1065 . … Plaintiffs cite the case of Ward v. Wiggins, supra, as authority1 for the contention that the consideration in the instant case was not “fair”.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hope v. Peck

    38 Okla. 531 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1913

    Brown et al. v. First National Bank, 35 Okla. 736 , 130 Pac. 140 ; Cook v. State et al., 35 Okla. 653 . 130 Pac. 300 . In Brooks et al. v. … Co. v. McKee, ante, 132 Pac. 497 . See, also, Marple v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Nat. Bank, 28 Okla. 810 , 115 Pac. 1124 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701 , 127 Pac. 478 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • First Nat. Bank of Sallisaw v. Ballard

    41 Okla. 553 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1914

    Rep. 64 ; Boynton v. Spafford, 61 Ill. App. 384 ; Kirkpatrick v. Howk, 80 Ill. 122 ; Stewart v. Davis, Ex’r, 18 Ind. 74 ; Bank of Monroe v. Gifford, 79 Iowa, 300 , 44 N. W. 558 ; Embree v. Strickland, 1 White & W. Civ. … App. sec. 1299; Holliday v. Brown, 33 Neb. 657 , 50 N. W. 1042 ; Pierce v. Atwood, 64 Neb. 92 , 89 N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Glass

    69 O.B.A.J. 2148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1998

    In Carmichael v. … Barry v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Coyle

    108 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1925

    BRANSON, V. C. J. The appeal herein is from a judgment in the sum of $450 rendered in favor of one John Coyle, against J. E. Ball and L. L. Laws. … Coble v. Barringer (N. C.) 38 S. E. 518 ; Allison v. Thomas (Cal.) 14 Pac. 309 ; Sweet v. Brown (Mass.) 45 Am. Dec. 243 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Oklahoma City

    122 Okla. 234 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1927

    In Moore v. … In People v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Chambers

    93 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

    An appeal was taken from this order oraniz-ing union graded school district No. 2 to the «board of county commissioners of Ellis county. Said board held that they had no jurisdiction of said appeal. … Supt., v. Hayes et al., 92 Okla. 32 , 117 Pac. 477 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McLaughlin v. Nettleton

    47 Okla. 407 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1915

    Judgments rendered in somewhat similar circumstances were vacated upon the ground of unavoidable casualty in the following cases: Adams v. Rathbun, 14 S. D. 552, 86 N. W. 62 ; Simpkins v. … All the Justices concur, except BROWN, J., disqualified and not participating.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Giles v. Doggett

    500 P.2d 574 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1972

    McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 , 45 S. Ct. 16, 17 , 69 L.Ed. 158, 161 (1924); Rice v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 208 Okl. 440 , 257 P.2d 292 (1953); Layman v. … State Board of Medical Examiners, 208 Okl. 440 , 257 P.2d 292 (1953), the State Board of Medical Examiners sought to enjoin Rice from practicing medicine without a license.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v. City of Enid

    179 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1937

    The record discloses that for the fiscal year in question the defendant city made, and the excise board approved, an estimate of $13,733 for electric current and fuel. … Both of these propositions have been decided adversely to plaintiff’s contention in Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. City of Tulsa, 174 Okla. 58 , 50 P. (2d) 166 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Schuck v. Moore

    48 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1915

    Sproad v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230 , 54 Pac. 458 ; Denny v. Wright, 13 Okla. 256 , 74 Pac. 104 ; Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423 , 98 Pac. 341 ; Meadors v. Johnson, 27 Okla. 543 , 117 Pac. 198 ; Brown v. … Co. v. Fain, 34 Okla. 164 , 124 Pac. 70 . We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. Judge of the 15th Judicial District

    542 P.2d 945 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1975

    We dealt with our powers to vacate orders of administrative bodies in Board of Education of Dependent School District #32 v. … Oklahoma State Board of Education, 521 P.2d 390 (Okl. 1974), wherein the acts of the State Board of Education were vacated and set aside by mandamus. See State ex rel. Freeling v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Adair County Com'rs v. McCloud

    64 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1916

    In Yan Trees v. … Hinton v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Overton v. Overton

    121 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1926

    Brown v. Brown, 104 Okla. 206 , 230 Pac. 853 ; Farneman v. Farneman, 46 Ind. App. 453 , 90 N. E. 775 , 91 N. E. 968 ; Murray v. Postal T. & C. Co., 210 Mass. 188 , 96 N. E. 316 , Ann. Cas. 1912C, 1183. … In Mussellem v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Badgett v. Oklahoma Life Ins. Co.

    176 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935

    Brown et al. v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 P. 173 . … Brown et al. v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 P. 173 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Stanley

    183 Okla. 445 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1938

    In Caddo County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. … These decisions are further supported by the decisions of this court in Wade v. Board of Com’rs of Harmon County, 161 Okla. 245 , 17 P.2d 690 ; Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.