Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.15s
172 Okla. 605 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935
The findings and recommendations, together with the transcript of the evidence and proceedings, were transmitted to the Board of Governors of the State Bar of Oklahoma, and. upon review, the Board of Governors approved the … McNEILE, O. ,T„ OSBOBN, V. O. .1., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, COBN, and GIBSON, JJ„ concur. WELCH, J., absent.
Cited 1 timesPublished202 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1949
ARNOLD, V. C. J. It appears from the record that in, 1940, W. H. … Shoffstall, the board of commissioners, the building inspector and the board of adjustment of the city of Tulsa to restrain and enjoin further proceedings in the matter of rezoning the above lots.
Cited 0 timesPublished97 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923
In Morrison State Bank v. … In the ease of Williams v.
Cited 6 timesPublished125 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1927
In the case of Hurie v. … No other members of the board ctf directors were shown to have been disqualified.
Cited 11 timesPublished110 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1925
Swan v. Bailey, 71 Okla. 30 , 174 Pac. 1065 . … Plaintiffs cite the case of Ward v. Wiggins, supra, as authority1 for the contention that the consideration in the instant case was not “fair”.
Cited 3 timesPublished38 Okla. 531 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1913
Brown et al. v. First National Bank, 35 Okla. 736 , 130 Pac. 140 ; Cook v. State et al., 35 Okla. 653 . 130 Pac. 300 . In Brooks et al. v. … Co. v. McKee, ante, 132 Pac. 497 . See, also, Marple v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Nat. Bank, 28 Okla. 810 , 115 Pac. 1124 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701 , 127 Pac. 478 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedFirst Nat. Bank of Sallisaw v. Ballard
41 Okla. 553 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1914
Rep. 64 ; Boynton v. Spafford, 61 Ill. App. 384 ; Kirkpatrick v. Howk, 80 Ill. 122 ; Stewart v. Davis, Ex’r, 18 Ind. 74 ; Bank of Monroe v. Gifford, 79 Iowa, 300 , 44 N. W. 558 ; Embree v. Strickland, 1 White & W. Civ. … App. sec. 1299; Holliday v. Brown, 33 Neb. 657 , 50 N. W. 1042 ; Pierce v. Atwood, 64 Neb. 92 , 89 N.
Cited 13 timesPublishedPrudential Insurance Co. of America v. Glass
69 O.B.A.J. 2148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1998
In Carmichael v. … Barry v.
Cited 34 timesPublished108 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1925
BRANSON, V. C. J. The appeal herein is from a judgment in the sum of $450 rendered in favor of one John Coyle, against J. E. Ball and L. L. Laws. … Coble v. Barringer (N. C.) 38 S. E. 518 ; Allison v. Thomas (Cal.) 14 Pac. 309 ; Sweet v. Brown (Mass.) 45 Am. Dec. 243 .
Cited 8 timesPublished122 Okla. 234 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1927
In Moore v. … In People v.
Cited 7 timesPublished93 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923
An appeal was taken from this order oraniz-ing union graded school district No. 2 to the «board of county commissioners of Ellis county. Said board held that they had no jurisdiction of said appeal. … Supt., v. Hayes et al., 92 Okla. 32 , 117 Pac. 477 .
Cited 1 timesPublished47 Okla. 407 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1915
Judgments rendered in somewhat similar circumstances were vacated upon the ground of unavoidable casualty in the following cases: Adams v. Rathbun, 14 S. D. 552, 86 N. W. 62 ; Simpkins v. … All the Justices concur, except BROWN, J., disqualified and not participating.
Cited 7 timesPublished500 P.2d 574 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1972
McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 , 45 S. Ct. 16, 17 , 69 L.Ed. 158, 161 (1924); Rice v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 208 Okl. 440 , 257 P.2d 292 (1953); Layman v. … State Board of Medical Examiners, 208 Okl. 440 , 257 P.2d 292 (1953), the State Board of Medical Examiners sought to enjoin Rice from practicing medicine without a license.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v. City of Enid
179 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1937
The record discloses that for the fiscal year in question the defendant city made, and the excise board approved, an estimate of $13,733 for electric current and fuel. … Both of these propositions have been decided adversely to plaintiff’s contention in Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. City of Tulsa, 174 Okla. 58 , 50 P. (2d) 166 .
Cited 8 timesPublished48 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1915
Sproad v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230 , 54 Pac. 458 ; Denny v. Wright, 13 Okla. 256 , 74 Pac. 104 ; Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423 , 98 Pac. 341 ; Meadors v. Johnson, 27 Okla. 543 , 117 Pac. 198 ; Brown v. … Co. v. Fain, 34 Okla. 164 , 124 Pac. 70 . We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed. By the Court: It is so ordered.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStewart v. Judge of the 15th Judicial District
542 P.2d 945 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1975
We dealt with our powers to vacate orders of administrative bodies in Board of Education of Dependent School District #32 v. … Oklahoma State Board of Education, 521 P.2d 390 (Okl. 1974), wherein the acts of the State Board of Education were vacated and set aside by mandamus. See State ex rel. Freeling v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Adair County Com'rs v. McCloud
64 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1916
In Yan Trees v. … Hinton v.
Cited 8 timesPublished121 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1926
Brown v. Brown, 104 Okla. 206 , 230 Pac. 853 ; Farneman v. Farneman, 46 Ind. App. 453 , 90 N. E. 775 , 91 N. E. 968 ; Murray v. Postal T. & C. Co., 210 Mass. 188 , 96 N. E. 316 , Ann. Cas. 1912C, 1183. … In Mussellem v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBadgett v. Oklahoma Life Ins. Co.
176 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935
Brown et al. v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 P. 173 . … Brown et al. v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 P. 173 .
Cited 14 timesPublished183 Okla. 445 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1938
In Caddo County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. … These decisions are further supported by the decisions of this court in Wade v. Board of Com’rs of Harmon County, 161 Okla. 245 , 17 P.2d 690 ; Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna