Case law

St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bell

134 Okla. 251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1928

Bell boarded the train at Madill,. having paid passage to Aylesworth, and sat in the rear end of the defendant’s coach. … Co. v.

In Re Baxter

132 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1928

Page v. Turk, 43 Okla. 667 , 143 Pac. 1047 ; Section 7411, C. O. S. 1021; Moore v. Edgeman, 73 Okla. 159 , 175 Pac. 205 ; In re Rolater, 67 Okla. 215 , 170 Pac. 509 ; Farrow v. … Work, 39 Okla. 734 , 136 Pac. 739 ; Yingling v. Redwine, 12 Okla. 64 , 60 Pac. 810 ; Balduff v. Griswold, 9 Okla. 438 , 60 Pac. 223 ; 41 C. J. 279; Worley v. Carter, 30 Okla. 642 , 121 Pac. 669 ; Gillett v.

Lowe v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 97

79 Okla. 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 10, 1920

Ratliff et al. v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. W. H. … To the same effect are Grove v. Haskell, 24 Okla. 707 , 104 Pac. 56 ; McCarty v. Cain, 27 Okla. 22 , 110 Pac. 653 ; Hughes v. City of Sapulpa, 75 Okla. 149 , 182 Pac. 511 . See Lamb v.

Overton v. Overton

121 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1926

Brown v. Brown, 104 Okla. 206 , 230 Pac. 853 ; Farneman v. Farneman, 46 Ind. App. 453 , 90 N. E. 775 , 91 N. E. 968 ; Murray v. Postal T. & C. Co., 210 Mass. 188 , 96 N. E. 316 , Ann. Cas. 1912C, 1183. … In Mussellem v.

Oklahoma Wheat Pool Elevator Corp. v. Bouquot

180 Okla. 159 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1937

Co. v. Union Steamboat Co., 107 U. S. 98, 100 ; Derr v. Fisher, 22 Okla. 126 , 98 P. 978 ; Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Anderson, 28 Okla. 650 , 115 P. 767 ; Overholser v. … In the case of Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v.

In re the Protest of Patton

378 P.2d 762 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1963

Upon this finding, the Board denied the protest and Osage appealed to the district court, where the case was submitted on the record, briefs and arguments of the parties, and the order of the Board was upheld. … Bates v. Starr Coal Co., 191 Okl. 451 , 130 P.2d 532 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. BLACKBIRD, C. J., HALLEY, V. C. J., and WILLIAMS and BERRY, JJ., concur.

Kroth v. Oklahoma State Penitentiary

408 P.2d 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1965

In Johnson v. … See, Anderson v. Dukes, 193 Okl. 395 , 143 P.2d 800 ; Landrum v. Ownby, Okl., 290 P.2d 400 ; Cravatt v. City of Oklahoma City, Okl., 295 P.2d 807 .

Carswell v. Oklahoma State University

995 P.2d 1118 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 2000

See also, Sanchez v. City of Sand Springs, 1990 OK 26, ¶ 12 , 789 P.2d 240 ; Trent v. Board of County Comm'rs, 1988 OK 15 , ¶ 10, 755 P.2d 615 ; Doe v. Independent School Dist. … Bivins v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Memorial Hosp., supra this note, provides in pertinent part at ¶ 5: "Extant GTCA jurisprudence, Trent v. Board of County Commissioners, Sanchez v. City of Sand Springs, and Doe v.

Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. v. Bounds

198 Okla. 69 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1946

In Brown Bros. v. Parks, 176 Okla. 615 , 56 P. 2d 883 , a case arising upon a petition for an award because of change of condition, we said: “. . . … While the quotation from Brown Bros, v.

Harjo v. Willibey

138 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1929

Tiger v. Ward, 60 Okla. 36 , 158 Pac. 941 ; Lowrance v. Henry, 75 Okla. 250 , 182 Pac. 489 ; Penny v. Vost, 108 Okla. 103 , 234 Pac. 601 ; Nolan v. Mathis et al., 134 Okla. 70 , 272 Pac. 857 ; Winans v. … In the case of Johnson v.

City of Chandler v. State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services

63 O.B.A.J. 2920 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1992

Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 422 P.2d 840 (Okla.1966). In statutory construction, legislative intent is the governing principle. Humphrey v. Denney, 757 P.2d 833 (Okla.1988); Darnell v. … The Lincoln County Board of Commissioners were furnishing office space which was not adequate or suitable for DHS’s needs in Lincoln County.

Tindall Motor Co., Inc. v. Mankin

184 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1938

There had been a broken board for sometime. Q. As foreman, what did you do about that board, if anything? A. I reported it to Mr. Oorey, the agent. Q. When did you report it to Mr. Oorey, the agent? A. … Therefore, the case of Peet v. Remington, etc., Co., 83 N. Y.

Harn v. State Ex Rel. Williamson

184 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1939

Carter v. Davis, 141 Okla. 172 , 284 P. 3 . … WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

Seidenbach's v. Loveless

338 P.2d 882 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1959

Citing IS O.S.1951 § 237; Colonial Jewelry Co. v. Bridges, 43 Okl. 813 , 144 P. 577 . … Colonial Jewelry Co. v. Brown, 38 Okl. 44 , 131 P. 1077 ; J. M. Hoard, Jr., Co. v. Grand Rapids Showcase Co., 74 Okl. 111 , 173 P. 844 ; Yeager v. Jackson, 162 Okl. 207 , 19 P.2d 970 .

Bilby v. Brockman

55 Okla. 714 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

Jenings v. Brown, 20 Okla. 294 , 94 Pac. 557 . … Yarbrough v. Spalding, 31 Okla. 806 , 123 Pac. 843 ; Rice v. Anderson, 39 Okla. 279 , 134 Pac. 1120 ; Scott v. Brakel, 43 Okla. 655 , 143 Pac. 510 ; Gilbert v. Brown, 44 Okla. 194 , 144 Pac. 359 .

Tonkawa Milling Co. v. Town of Tonkawa

15 Okla. 672 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1905

(Nickum v. Burkhardy 30 Oregon, 464; Bear v. Commissioners, 121 N. C. 294 ; Davis v. Davis, 26 Cal. 23 ; Dale v. Turne, 34 Mich. 405 ; Hammerslaugh v. Chatham 84 Mo. 21 ; Dwelling House Ins. Co. v. … Johnson, 47 Kans. 5 ; Anderson v. Hubble, 93 Ind. 570 ; Independent School Dist. v. Merchants National Bank, Supreme Court of Iowa, 27 N. W. Rep. 255 ; Grey v. Pingrey, 17 Vt. 419 ; Warder et al v.

Young v. J. A. Young MacHine & Supply Co.

203 Okla. 595 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1950

Co. v. Anadarko Producers’ Gas & Oil Co. et al., 115 Okla. 127 , 241 P. 493 ; 53 C. J. S., Liens, sec. 2. As to this principle of law, in National Cash Register Co. v. … DAVISON, C.J., ARNOLD, V. C. J., and GIBSON, LUTTRELL, HALLEY, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

Shick v. Enid Clinic

184 Okla. 484 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1939

Mainard v. Fowler, 171 Okla. 582 , 42 P.2d 878 ; Culbertson v. Mann, 30 Okla. 249 , 120 P. 918 ; Harrah State Bank v. School Dist. No. 70, Oklahoma County, 47 Okla. 593 , 149 P. 1190 . … Oilton State Bank v. Ross, 108 Okla. 24 , 234 P. 567 ; D’Yarmett v. Cobe, 51 Okla. 113 , 151 P. 589 .

Beveridge v. Fairfax Oil Corporation

177 Okla. 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1936

OSBORN, V. 0. J. J. L. … In the case of American Oil & Refining Co. v.

Veazey Drug Co. v. Bruza

169 Okla. 418 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1934

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. McHan, 162 Okla. 8 , 18 P. (2d) 875 ; Rorabaugh-Brown D. G. Co. v. Matthews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 . … Mobley v. Brown, 151 Okla. 167 , 2 P. (2d) 1034 ; Havens v. State Industrial Commission, 156 Okla. 160 , 9 P. (2d) 933 ; Crown Drug Co. v. Hofstrom, 158 Okla. 27 , 12 P. (2d) 519 ; Spivey & McGill v.