Case law

Sand Springs Home v. State

168 Okla. 323 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1933

See, also, Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Sisters of the Sorrowful Mother, 141 Okla. 32 . 283 P. 984 ; Beta Theta Pi Corporation v. … Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County, 108 Okla. 78 , 234 P. 354 ; Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden de Predicadores, 263 U. S. 578 .

Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A. v. Southwestern Bank & Trust Co.

68 O.B.A.J. 995 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1997

See also Brown v. Ford, Okl., 905 P.2d 223, 228 (1995); Simpson v. Dixon, Okl., 853 P.2d 176, 183 (1993); Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., Okl., 833 P.2d 1218, 1229 (1992); Johnson v. … Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County, 185 Okl. 111 , 90 P.2d 442, 446 (1939); Maule, supra note 7 at 203 n. 30; Dabney, supra note 7 at 1095-1096 (Opala, J., concurring).

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Perkins

115 Okla. 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1925

Co. v. … The case of Hines v.

Wilkin-Hale Bank v. Herstein

48 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

In Michie on Banks and Banking, section 102 (5b) it is said: “The president of the bank is generally, if not always, a member of the board of directors, and chosen by the board from their own number. … The board of directors had no knowledge of such unauthorized acts, and therefore could not have ratified them. Western National Bank v. Armstrong, 152 U. S. 346 , 14 Sup. Ct. 572, 38 L. Ed. 470 .

State Ex Rel. Owen v. Carter

77 Okla. 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1919

Louthan, 35 Okla. 407 ; Board of County Commissioners of Beaver County v. Culwell, 41 Okla. 712 ; Privett v. Board of County Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 523 ; Carrico et al. v. … Couch et al., 45 Okla. 672 ; and Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v.

James v. State Ex Rel. Finney

160 Okla. 99 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1932

The question here presented has been decided adversely to the contention of defendants in Arnold v. Board of Com’rs of Creek County, 124 Okla. 42 , 254 P. 31 , wherein it was held: “Section 185, C. O. … J„ CLARK, V. O. J., and HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, MeNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ„ concur.

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Young

107 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1924

Watson (Fla.) 62 South. 484 ; Brown v. Fessenden (Me.) 17 Atl. 709 ; State v. Barrett (Ind.) 22 N. E. 969 ; Johnson v. Hall, 101 Ga. 687 ; Probate Court v. Williams (R. I.) 73 Atl. 382, 388 . … We approve the rule announced by this court in Board of Co. Com’rs v.

Oklahoma City v. Griffin

403 P.2d 463 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1965

Short v. … For examples of this, see Bell v. Crum, 188 Okl. 67 , 106 P.2d 518 , and Lowden v. Oklahoma County Excise Board, 186 Okl. 706 , 100 P.2d 448 .

BURNS v. CLINE

2014 OK 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 2014

OSCN Found Document:BURNS v. CLINE OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar Help Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only BURNS v. … Pettigrew, D.O., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners, and Greg Mashburn, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Cleveland, Garvin, and McClain Counties, Appellees

Heiman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

62 O.B.A.J. 869 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1991

Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422, 428 , 102 S.Ct. 1148, 1154 , 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1982). 10 . See Mennonite Board of Missions v. … Hough v. Hough, Okl., 772 P.2d 920, 921 (1989); Mayhue v. Mayhue, Okl., 706 P.2d 890 , 893 n. 8 (1985); Scoufos v. Fuller, Okl., 280 P.2d 720, 723 (1955). 12 . Mennonite Board of Missions v.

Holland v. Minnehoma Oil & Gas Co.

184 Okla. 640 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1939

The case of Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 98 Fed.2d 375, was appealed to the Supreme Court and decided in National Labor Relations Board v. … WELCH, V. C. J., and DAVISON, J., absent.

Regents of the State University v. Trapp, Auditor

28 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1911

The aggregate amount of these claims is the sum of $2,-235.70, for which aggregate amount an account in favor of the local treasurer of the board of regents has been approved by the State Board of Public Affairs for the purpose … In State v. Holder, 16 Miss. 158 , a very similar constitutional provision was considered as applied to an act somewhat similar to the act under consideration in the instant case.

S.K.W. v. STATE

2022 OK 39 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 2022

L . v. … Holder v. State , , , and Olson v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Grimes

354 P.2d 1080 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1960

Grimes v. … Grimes v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 903 , 75 S.Ct. 580 , 99 L.Ed. 1240 .

Holmes v. State ex rel. Trimble

406 P.2d 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1965

P(-) called the court clerk— * * V * * * I told the voice that indicated that he was Dr. P(-) * * * that he would need to send to Judge Brown a certifí-cate stating Mr. … And, in Ramer v. State ex rel.

Williams v. City of Durant

201 Okla. 113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1949

However, in City of Bristow v. … In Morris v.

Damon Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. Hoffman

169 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1934

In the case of Modern Brotherhood of America v. … For authority see Baxter v. Chelsea Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Mass.) 79 Am. Dec. 730 ; Mulrey v. Shawmut Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Mass.) 81 Am.

Bearden Co. v. City of Tulsa

471 P.2d 449 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1970

law requires the judgment of experts, citing Claxton v. … BERRY, V. C. J., and DAVISON, WILLIAMS, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON, LAVENDER and McINERNEY, JJ., concur.

C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley

142 Okla. 8 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

Treas., v. … Treas., v.

Gay v. Thomas

5 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1896

In Cheaney v. … Kelley v.