Case law

Waggoner v. Johnston

408 P.2d 761 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1965

Crosbie, Inc., 182 Okl. 327 , 77 P.2d 547 (Involving a bill in the nature of interpleader); Board of Education of City of Atchison v. Scoville, 13 Kan. 17 . … Co., v. Brown, 119 F.Supp. 920 (M.D.Ala.), in which the exact contention espoused by the Waggoners in this case was advanced, provides a thorough analysis of the right to a jury trial in interpleader actions.

Tindall Motor Co., Inc. v. Mankin

184 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1938

There had been a broken board for sometime. Q. As foreman, what did you do about that board, if anything? A. I reported it to Mr. Oorey, the agent. Q. When did you report it to Mr. Oorey, the agent? A. … Therefore, the case of Peet v. Remington, etc., Co., 83 N. Y.

U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Cook

105 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

The board of education of ‘the city of Tulsa entered into a written contract with the Latimer Rouch Construction Company for the erection of certain school buildings in the city of Tulsa. … The plaintiffs, having in mind the case of Hutchinson v. Krueger, 34 Okla. 23 , 124 Pac. 591 , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 315, Ann. Cas. 1914-C, 98, considered the bond as executed as being insufficient in form.

Fulkerson v. Johnson

138 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1929

Nixon v. Gen. Explosive Co., 87 Okla. 88 , 209 Pac. 428 ; Schuber v. McDuffie, 67 Okla. 160 , 169 Pac. 642 ; Lee v. U. S., 7 Okla. 558 , 54 Pac. 792 ; Doorley v. Burford & George Mfg. Co., 5 Okla. 594 , 49 Pac. 936 . … The question was before this court in Glasser v.

ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.

415 P.3d 521 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 2018

Supp. 2013 § 106 ; *532 Brown v. Claims Mgmt. … Brown , 2017 OK 13 at ¶ 22, 391 P.3d 111 ; TWA v.

Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Adams

27 Okla. 496 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

Speaking of similar conditions, the court in Brown v. … Co. v. Randolph, supra, and Collins v. Ins.

In Re Integration of State Bar of Oklahoma

185 Okla. 505 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1939

Ward v. Harrington, 266 Ky. 41 , 98 S.W.2d 53 : Clark v. Austin (Mo.) 101 S. W.2d 977 . “The claim of inherent judicial power is no novelty. … Oklahoma Bar Association, Complainant, v. _ (the accused attorney), Respondent.

Sharp v. Choctaw Ry. & Lighting Co.

34 Okla. 730 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1912

Ten Cate v. Sharp, 8 Okla. 300 , 57 Pac. 645 ; Yarnell v. Kilgore, 15 Okla. 591 , 82 Pac. 990 ; Trower v. Roberts, 17 Okla. 641 , 89 Pac. 1113 ; Citizens’ State Bank v. … Anthony v. Eddy, 5 Kan. 127 ; Field v. Kinnear, 5 Kan. 233, 238 ; Owen v. Owen, 9 Kan. 91 ; Atyeo v. Kelsey, 13 Kan. 212 ; Brown v. Atchison, etc., Ry. Co., 29 Kan. 186 ; City of Sedan v.

In Re Daniel's Omitted Property

108 Okla. 195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1924

Justice Kane said in Anderson v. … The state has cited the opinion of a divided .court in the case of State v.

Cox v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

197 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1946

Tharel v. Board, 188 Okla. 184 , 107 P. 2d 542 . Apparently the Tax Commission governed its action by that rule of law. … City of Jacksonville, 50 Ill. 39 , prohibiting beer; Brown v.

IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION

2023 OK 65 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 2023

The Board of Governors have determined that the members set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, have not paid their dues and/or expense charges for the year as provided in the Rules. … Higgins 420 S Lawton Ave Apt 517 Tulsa, OK 74127-8929 OBA # 14351 Robert Earl Jones Jr. 1819 Rolling Hills St Norman, OK 73072-6707 OBA # 11125 Theodore Koss Jr. 10604 Admiral Dr Oklahoma City, OK 73162-6806 OBA # 5240 John V.

Moorehead v. Davis

13 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

In the case of Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company v. … To the same effect is the Northern Assurance Company v. Grand View Building Association, 183 U. S. 308 .

Snow v. Cody

96 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1923

See Bank of Perry v. Cooke, 3 Okla. 534 , 41 Pac. 628 ; Citizens' State Bank v. Brown, 110 Minn. 176 , 124 N. W. 990 . … In Kane v. Lodor, 56 N. J.

Van Antwerp v. Garnett

174 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1935

In support of this contention the defendants cite in their brief and rely on the following cases: Brown et al. v. Kemmerer, 140 Okla. 140 , 282 P. 297 ; Hancock v. … Oklahoma Farm Mortgage Co. v. Hatcher, 106 Okla. 262 , 234 P. 203 . This court held in Miller v.

Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.

66 O.B.A.J. 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1995

NTC of America, see note 7, supra at 806; Leonhardt Enter, v. Houseman, 562 P.2d 515, 517 (Okla.1977); Swyden Const. Co. v. White, 383 P.2d 674, 675 (Okla. 1963). In Brown v. … See e.g., Reynolds Elec. & Eng'g Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board, 55 Cal. Rptr. 248, 252 , 65 Cal.2d 429 , 421 P.2d 96, 100 (1967); Mattel v. Pittman Const.

Southwestern Osteopathic Sanitarium v. Davis

115 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1926

A. of Omaha v. … In Washburn College v.

Chickasha Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

528 P.2d 1384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1974

Equitable Royalty Corporation v. State, Okl., 352 P.2d 365 . … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and IRWIN, HODGES, LAVENDER, BARNES and SIMMS, JJ., concur.

Mellon Company v. McCafferty

38 Okla. 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1913

The question arising upon the demurrer is identical with the point decided in Oklahoma City Mill & Elevator Company v. … See, also, Williams, County Clerk, v. Garfield Exchange Bank of Enid, post, 134 Pac. 863 . Following these- cases, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. HAYES, C.

Coggeshall v. Conner

31 Okla. 113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

White v. Levant, 78 Me. 568 , 7 Atl. 539 ; Talbot v. East Machias, 76 Me. 415 ; Sikes v. Hatfield, 13 Gray (Mass.) 347 ; Walker v. Cook, 129 Mass. 578 ; Board of County Commissioners of Greer County v. … Board of County Commissioners v. Watson, supra; Throop on Public Officers (1892) section 449; Cole v. White County, 32 Ark. 45 ; Wortham v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Sheets

54 Okla. 586 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

the defendant received him as a passenger on one of its trains, and for a valuable consideration undertook to safely transport him from the town of Mineo to the town of Union in the State of Oklahoma; that after he had boarded … In Noble v. A., T. & S. F. Ry.