Case law

In Re Assessment of Champlin Refining Co.

129 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1927

Substantially, in; principle, the same contentions were made and determined adversely in Pierce Oil Corporation v. Phoenix Ref. Co., 79 Okla. 36 , 190 Pac. 857 , affirmed in 259 U. S. 125 , 42 Sup. Ct. 440, 66 L. … Pierce Oil Corporation v. Phoenix Refining Co., supra.

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Young

107 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1924

Watson (Fla.) 62 South. 484 ; Brown v. Fessenden (Me.) 17 Atl. 709 ; State v. Barrett (Ind.) 22 N. E. 969 ; Johnson v. Hall, 101 Ga. 687 ; Probate Court v. Williams (R. I.) 73 Atl. 382, 388 . … We approve the rule announced by this court in Board of Co. Com’rs v.

McCaffrey v. Owings

110 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1925

Swan v. Bailey, 71 Okla. 30 , 174 Pac. 1065 . … Plaintiffs cite the case of Ward v. Wiggins, supra, as authority1 for the contention that the consideration in the instant case was not “fair”.

Interstate Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Oklahoma City

84 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1921

In the recent case of Morehouse v. … Swan v. Duncan, 78 Okla. 305 , 190 Pac. 678 ; Parker v. Tomm, 78 Okla. 103 , 188 Pac. 1074 .

Public Service Company of Oklahoma v. City of Tulsa

174 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1935

It is unnecessary to discuss such cases, 'as City of Pawhuska v. … Hume v. Wyand, 68 Okla. 261 , 173 P. 813 .

Cherokee Public Service Co. v. Harry Cragin Lbr. Co.

174 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1935

The service company next contends that a resolution of the board of directors prevented debts in excess of $500 being incurred by its officers or agents without the approval of the board. … Co. v. Bishop Mfg. Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 235 S. W. 850 ; Barber v. Stromberg-Carlson Telephone Mfg. Co., 81 Neb. 517 , 116 N. W. 157 ; Edwards v. Plains Light & Water Co., 49 Mont. 535 , 143 P. 962 . See Barnes et al. v.

Reed v. Ross

194 Okla. 195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1944

Board of County Commissioners of Greer County v. Gregory et al., 15 Okla. 208 , 81 P. 422 ; Tonini et al. v. Board of County Commissioners et al., 100 Okla. 246 , 229 P. 263 . … In Southern Surety Co. v.

City of Holdenville v. Lawson

40 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1913

Board of County Commissioners of Fountain County, 46 Ind. 380 ; Board of County Commissioners of Cass County v. Ross et al., 6 Ind. 404 ; Smith v. Mayor and Council of Sacramento City et al., 13 Cal. 531 ; Hornblower v. … Duden, 35 Cal. 664 ; Huffman v. Board of County Commissioners of Greenwood County, 23 Kan. 281 ; Roper v. Tozan of Laurinburg (N. C.) Am. & Eng. Corporation Cases, vol. 7, p. 130.

300 Pin Ball, Slot or Marble Machines v. State ex rel. Mills

264 P.2d 337 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1953

Brett, County Attorney, v. … In the body of that opinion, we find the following: “Section 973, supra, provides for a court hearing without a jury, which was approved as constitutional in Moore v.

Cobb v. Alberti

38 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1913

Plaintiffs brought this proceeding in the court below to obtain an injunction restraining defendants as members, of the board of county commissioners of Kay county from attempting to carry out orders made by said board creating … Gilbert v. City of New Haven, 40 Conn. 102 ; section 1306, Page & Jones on Taxation by Assessment. The judgment of the trial court, denying to plaintiffs the injunction sought, is accordingly affirmed.

Ten Cate v. Sharp

8 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1899

(McCreary v. Hart, 39 Kan. 218 , 17 Pac. 839 ; Field v. Kinnear, 5 Kan. 138 ; Owen v. Owen, 9 Kan. 96 ; Atyeo v. Kelsey, 13 Kan. 216 ; City of Sedan v. Church, 29 Kan. 192 ; Brown v. … It was said in City of Sedan v.

Woods v. Ft. Smith & Western Ry. Co.

96 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

Co. v. Johnson, 25 Okla. 760 , 107 Pac. 662 ; M., O. & G. Ry. v. Brown, 41 Okla. 70 , 136 Pac. 1117 . … Coalgate Co. v. Isherwood (Ind. Ter.) 104 S. W. 565 ; Capps v. Vasey Bros., 23 Okla. 554 , 101 Pac. 1043 ; Welch v. Evans Bros. Const. Co. (Ala.) 60 South. 517 ; Wynn v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Thrash v. Thrash

809 P.2d 665 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1991

He cites Kissinger v. Kissinger, 692 P.2d 71 (Okla.App.1984) which concluded that the holding of McNeal v. … Brown v. Brown, 607 P.2d 1358, 1359 (Okla.1980). The record does not reveal how the trial court calculated the amount of the arrearage.

Moorehead v. Davis

13 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

In the case of Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company v. … To the same effect is the Northern Assurance Company v. Grand View Building Association, 183 U. S. 308 .

Nelson v. Carter Oil Co.

191 Okla. 388 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1942

O’Neal, 185 Okla. 547 , 94 P. 2d 909 ; Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. … Murray, 167 Okla. 460 , 30 P. 2d 185 ; Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. State Industrial Commission, supra.

Baxley v. City of Frederick

133 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1928

Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles (Cal.) 234 Pac. 381; Zahn v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles (Cal.) 234 Pac. 388 ; Ware v. City of Wichita, supra; West v. … The case of Zahn v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles, supra, likewise was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, and is found in 274 U. S. 325 .

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. State Ex Rel. Horton

185 Okla. 324 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1939

The opinion in State v. … The board of county commissioners made an estimate of the salary fund, which was raised by the county excise board, and the railroad contended the excise board had no authority to increase the levy.

Shawnee-Tecumseh Traction Co. v. Wollard

54 Okla. 432 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1915

City of Shawnee et al. v. … Co. v.

Walker v. Chambers

93 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

An appeal was taken from this order oraniz-ing union graded school district No. 2 to the «board of county commissioners of Ellis county. Said board held that they had no jurisdiction of said appeal. … Supt., v. Hayes et al., 92 Okla. 32 , 117 Pac. 477 .

Tonkawa Milling Co. v. Town of Tonkawa

15 Okla. 672 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1905

(Nickum v. Burkhardy 30 Oregon, 464; Bear v. Commissioners, 121 N. C. 294 ; Davis v. Davis, 26 Cal. 23 ; Dale v. Turne, 34 Mich. 405 ; Hammerslaugh v. Chatham 84 Mo. 21 ; Dwelling House Ins. Co. v. … Johnson, 47 Kans. 5 ; Anderson v. Hubble, 93 Ind. 570 ; Independent School Dist. v. Merchants National Bank, Supreme Court of Iowa, 27 N. W. Rep. 255 ; Grey v. Pingrey, 17 Vt. 419 ; Warder et al v.