Case law

Coggeshall v. Conner

31 Okla. 113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

White v. Levant, 78 Me. 568 , 7 Atl. 539 ; Talbot v. East Machias, 76 Me. 415 ; Sikes v. Hatfield, 13 Gray (Mass.) 347 ; Walker v. Cook, 129 Mass. 578 ; Board of County Commissioners of Greer County v. … Board of County Commissioners v. Watson, supra; Throop on Public Officers (1892) section 449; Cole v. White County, 32 Ark. 45 ; Wortham v.

Mellon Company v. McCafferty

38 Okla. 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1913

The question arising upon the demurrer is identical with the point decided in Oklahoma City Mill & Elevator Company v. … See, also, Williams, County Clerk, v. Garfield Exchange Bank of Enid, post, 134 Pac. 863 . Following these- cases, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. HAYES, C.

Hamilton v. Oklahoma City

527 P.2d 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1974

Board of Commissioners v. Beaty, 67 Okl. 281 , 171 P. 34 (1918). The test for determining whether population is a reasonable basis for classification has been consistently stated by this Court as set forth in Key v. … Bell v. Crum, 188 Okl. 67 , 106 P.2d 518 (1940); Lowden v. Okla. Co. Excise Board, 186 Okl. 706 , 100 P.2d 448 (1940). *17 A classification scheme very similar to the Act in question was considered in Lowden v. Okla.

Hawkins v. Hawkins

52 Okla. 786 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1915

McKee v. Howard, 38 *789 Okla. 422, 134 Pac. 44 ; Lookabaugh v. Cooper, 5 Okla. 102 , 48 Pac. 99 ; Long v. Board of County Commissioners, 5 Okla. 128, 47 Pac. 1063 ; Anderson v. Chrisman, 37 Okla. 73 , 130 Pac. 539 . … Long v. Board of County Commissioners, supra; Anderson v. Chrisman, supra. Section 5268, Rev.

Ryan v. Bass Furniture Co.

113 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

Frisco v. Haworth, 48 Okla. 132 , 149 Pac. 1086 ; Frisco v. Thompson, 35 Okla. 138 , 128 Pac. 685 ; Frisco v. Amend, 44 Okla. 602 , 145 Pac. 1117 ; Frisco v. Tate, 35 Okla. 563 , 130 Pac. 941 ; Frisco v. … Co. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 , 209 Pac. 749 ; McGee v. School Dist., 82 Okla. 18 , 198 Pac. 61 .

State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. Western Surety Company

494 P.2d 1242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1972

Estill v. … In Morris v.

Simpson Twp. v. Hill

40 Okla. 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1913

the warrants sued upon were legally and properly issued upon accounts legally presented, audited, and allowed by the boaud of directors of said Simpson township, and that all the claims so audited and allowed by the *234 board … Else et al. v. Freeman et al., 72 Kan. 666, 83 Pac. 409 ; Allen v. Wildman, 38 Okla. 652 , 134 Pac. 1102 . The ground, therefore, upon which defendant seeks to reverse this cause, is not presented by the record.

Thrash v. Thrash

809 P.2d 665 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1991

He cites Kissinger v. Kissinger, 692 P.2d 71 (Okla.App.1984) which concluded that the holding of McNeal v. … Brown v. Brown, 607 P.2d 1358, 1359 (Okla.1980). The record does not reveal how the trial court calculated the amount of the arrearage.

Staley v. Park

125 Okla. 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1926

In the case of Perkins v. … In the case of Bocox v.

Daman v. Chamberlain

26 Okla. 631 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

In Clark et al. v. … In the case of State ex rel. v.

Vette v. Childers

102 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1924

Cruce v. … Said appraise-ments shall be made by the State Board of Agriculture.

Jordan v. Bodine

88 Okla. 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1923

, and that said board of education now intends to issue, certify, sell, and dispose of said bonds. … JOHNSON, V. C. J., and KENNAMER, NICHOLSON, COCHRAN, and BRANSON, JJ., concur.

City of Oklahoma City v. State

789 P.2d 1300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1990

Matter of Income Tax Protest, 751 P.2d 1070, 1073 (Okla.1988); Hess v. Excise Bd., 698 P.2d 930, 932 (Okla.1985). . State v. Bristow, 131 Iowa 664 , 109 N.W. 199, 200 (1906); Lumbert v. … See also, Oberlander v. Porterfield, 28 Ohio St.2d 171, 277 N.E.2d 198, 200 (1971); Rockower Bros., Inc. v. Comptroller, 240 Md. 379 , 214 A.2d 581, 586 (1965). . See, City of Bisbee v.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Evans Lumber Co.

351 P.2d 1067 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1960

Co. v. … In Waters Pierce Oil Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. National Bank of Commerce

139 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1929

Ledegar v. Bockoven, County Treas,, 77 Okla. 58 , 185 Pac. 1097 . This court in Board of Com’rs of Woods County et al. v. State ex rel. … Board of County Commissioners v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office, supra.

McDONALD v. THOMPSON

414 P.3d 367 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 2018

Further, the use of the term "all" as emphasized above necessarily implies the pay increase will be given across the board without regard to merit. … See, OCPAImpact , Inc ., v. Sheehan , 2016 OK 84 , 377 P.3d 138 (Taylor, J., with whom Kauger and Winchester, JJ., join concurring).

Woods v. Ft. Smith & Western Ry. Co.

96 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

Co. v. Johnson, 25 Okla. 760 , 107 Pac. 662 ; M., O. & G. Ry. v. Brown, 41 Okla. 70 , 136 Pac. 1117 . … Coalgate Co. v. Isherwood (Ind. Ter.) 104 S. W. 565 ; Capps v. Vasey Bros., 23 Okla. 554 , 101 Pac. 1043 ; Welch v. Evans Bros. Const. Co. (Ala.) 60 South. 517 ; Wynn v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Checotah Hardware Co. v. Hensley

42 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1914

Rep. 867 ; Hodges' Adm'x x v. South Fork, etc., Co. (Ky.) 50 S. W. 969 ; Higgins v. Lansingh, 154 Ill. 301 , 40 N. E. 362 ; Sage v. Culver, 147 N. Y. 241 , 41 N. E. 513 ; Pond v. Vermont Valley R. … But, while the petition shows that the two individual defendants are directors and dominate the board, it is not made clearly to appear by sufficient averments that a demand on the board of directors to prosecute the rights

In Re Integration of State Bar of Oklahoma

185 Okla. 505 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1939

Ward v. Harrington, 266 Ky. 41 , 98 S.W.2d 53 : Clark v. Austin (Mo.) 101 S. W.2d 977 . “The claim of inherent judicial power is no novelty. … Oklahoma Bar Association, Complainant, v. _ (the accused attorney), Respondent.

Prince v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.

139 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1929

Eleven and 47/100 per cent, of the total would amount to $5,561.6(1, which was properly apportionable to the separate school fund under the authority of Board of Education of City of Sapulpa v. Board of Co. … Treas., v. Bass Furn. Co., 113 Okla. 86 , 241 Pac. 786 : Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Co. Treas., Tulsa Co., 110 Okla. 163 , 236 Pac. 896 .