Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

2.42s

  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KOSS

    2019 OK 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 2019

    OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Oklahoma Bar Association v. Brown Discussed oscn EMAIL: webmaster@oscn.net Oklahoma Judicial Center 2100 N Lincoln Blvd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McFarland v. Atkins

    594 P.2d 758 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1978

    V. … See Holden Hospital Corporation v. Southern Illinois Hospital Corporation, 22 Ill.2d 150 , 174 N.E.2d 793 (1961); Ludlum v. Higbee, 11 N.J.Eq. 342 (1895); Clark v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dickerson v. Incorporated Town of Eldorado

    64 Okla. 142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1917

    Corbin Oil Co. et al. v. Mull et al., 123 Ky. 763 , 97 S. W. 385 ; North Healdton Oil & Gas Co. v. Skelley et al., 59 Okla. 128 , 158 Pac. 1180 . In a case involving a similar principle (M., K. & T. R. Co. v. … Co. v. Garrison, 18 Okla. 461 , 90 Pac. 730 . In First National Bank of Byars v. Griffen et al., 31 Okla. 382 , 120 Pac. 595 , 49 L. R. A. (N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • REYNOLDS v. FALLIN

    2016 OK 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 2016

    HAWKINS v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION Discussed 2007 OK 27 , 163 P.3d 512 , FENT v. CONTINGENCY REVIEW BOARD Discussed at Length 2008 OK 1 , 176 P.3d 1204 , DARROW v. INTEGRIS HEALTH, INC. … BOARD OF COM'RS OF HARMON COUNTY v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMM'N Discussed 1984 OK 12 , 679 P.2d 1296 , Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Bd. Discussed at Length Title 12.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boswell v. Chambless

    189 Okla. 112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1941

    Defendant cites, as its principal authority, City of Bartlesville v. Keeler, 107 Okla. 14 , 229 P. 450 . … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. OSBORN and BAY-LESS, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chambers v. Walker

    85 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1922

    In addition to the members of the school board, the county superintendent, Arthur Walker, is also made a party defendant. iC. S. … This was decided in the case of Fowler, County Supt. of Public Instruction, et al. v. Park et al., 79 Okla. 1 , 190 Pac. 668 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • King v. City of McAlester

    273 P.2d 139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1954

    of Education of Oklahoma City v. … McGuire v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma City v. McWilliams

    108 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1925

    The court further ordered the said defendants, the said board of city commissioners of Oklahoma City, state of Oklahoma, to pay to said plaintiff forthwith and immediately upon receipt of this writ, or cause to be paid to … Co. v. Hitchcock County et al. (Neb.) 84 N. W. 97 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jacobson-Lampkin Paving Co. v. McMichael

    277 P.2d 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1954

    The principle of law relied upon by plaintiffs is well established, Oklahoma Title Co. v. Burrus, 172 Okl. 94 , 44 P.2d 852 ; S. & J. Supply Co. v. … First State Bank of Mangum v. Lock, 113 Okl. 30 , 237 P. 606 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Speed

    55 L.R.A. 402 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1901

    (Brown v. Buck, 75 Mich. 274 , 13 Am. St. Reps. p. 445.) … Rep. 381 ; Brown v. People, 19 Ill. 614 ; Bradley v. State, ex rel. Hill, (Ga.), 50 L. R.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • In re Richardson

    199 Okla. 406 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1947

    In Herrin v. … The statements therein made were later approved by this court in Jack Lincoln Shops v. State Dry Cleaners’ Board, 192 Okla. 251 , 135 P. 2d 332 . In State v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Hardware Company v. Townsend

    494 P.2d 326 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 22, 1972

    Pirtle v. Brown, supra; Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. Prowant, 114 Okl. 35 , 243 P. 165 ; Thomas v. … Pirtle v. Brown, supra; Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. White, 141 Okl. 240 , 284 P. 889 ; Braden Co. v. Lancaster Lumber Company, 170 Okl. 30 , 38 P.2d 575 , 102 A.L.R. 230 ; Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n v. Lyon

    276 P.3d 1002 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 2012

    Fent v. Contingency Review Board, 2007 OK 27, ¶ 7 , 163 P.3d 512, 519-520 . In essence, a plaintiff who has not suffered an injury attributable to the defendant lacks standing to bring a suit. … Lujan v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST NO. 40, NOWATA CTY. v. Allen

    446 P.2d 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1968

    In Herbert v. … In Melton v. Goodman, Okl., 317 P.2d 244 , we quoted from Cook v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Standard Lbr. Co.

    175 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1935

    In support of this contention two early Kancas cases were cited, the same being Blattner v. Wadleigh, 29 P. 165 , and Newman v. Brown & Co., 27 Kan. 117 . … Defendant cites the Kansas case, Newman v. Brown & Co., supra, as authority for the proposition that the name of the owner cannot be supplied in the lien statement by amendment, but as pointed out in Whitefield v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Metal Door & Trim Co. v. Hunt

    170 Okla. 240 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1934

    v. … Having concluded that the transaction was interstate commerce, it is unnecessary for us to discuss the cases of Browning v. Waycross and General Railway Signal Co. v.

    Overruled in part by B. K. Sweeney Co. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. Ex Rel. Sringfield Insurance Co., 429 P.2d 759 (1967)Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Love v. Schmidt

    31 L.R.A.N.S. 1162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

    See, also, Brown v. O'Neal, 95 Cal. 262 , 30 Pac, 538 , 29 Am. St. Rep. 111 ; Haskell v. Greely, 3 Me. 425 ; Brown v. Graham, 24 Ill. 628 . … In Lake v. Morris, 30 Conn. 201 , plaintiff at the time of the purchase was keeping the horses of his nephew, Lake, in his stable.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Sontag

    764 P.2d 883 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 17, 1988

    Fleming v. Baptist General Convention, 742 P.2d 1087, 1097 (Okl.1987). … A Writ of Mandamus is granted hereby ordering the Nowata County Election Board to strike the name of William G.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • HARRISON v. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM

    477 P.3d 383 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 2020

    OSCN Found Document:HARRISON v. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM HARRISON v. … RANDY HARRISON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. THE OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM and THE OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT BOARD of the State of Oklahoma, Respondents/Appellees.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Meriwether v. Lovett

    166 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1933

    In the case of Board of Equalization of Carter County v. … In the case of New York Life Insurance Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County, 155 Okla. 247 , 9 P. (2d) 936 , Mr.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.