Case law

Garvin Soil Conservation District v. Davis

381 P.2d 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1963

B; and they rely principally upon Tit. 66 O.S.1951 § 57, Oklahoma City v. Wells, 185 Okl. 369 , 91 P.2d 1077 , 123 A.L.R. 662 , and Morton v. … In support of their position, plaintiffs cite City of Blackwell v. Murduck, 206 Okl. 466 , 244 P.2d 817 , Elk City v. Rice, Okl., 286 P.2d 275 , and Chandler v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, Okl., 271 P.2d 374 .

Ponca City Savings Loan Association v. York

506 P.2d 554 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1973

Petitioner applied to the Board for permission to establish a branch office in Stillwater, Oklahoma. (18 O.S.1971, § 381.-24). After due notice and hearing, The Board granted permission. … Ford v. Keen et al., 201 Okl. 613 , 208 P.2d 176 ; Pioneer Telephone and Telegraph Company v. City of Bartlesville, 27 Okl. 214 , 111 P. 207 .

Empire Refineries, Inc. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

91 Okla. 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 3, 1923

Co. v. … Eddy v. Lafayette, 163 U. S. 456 , 41 L. Ed. 225 , 16 Sup. Ct. 1082; Ganebin v. Phelan, 5 Colo. 83 ; Grady v. Richmond & D. R. Co., 116 N. C. 952 , 21 S. E. 304 .’

State v. Atlantic Oil Producing Co.

174 Okla. 61 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1935

Again, in Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. … See Wilkin v. Board of Commissioners, supra.

Carter v. City of Tulsa

201 Okla. 629 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1949

The basis of the rule announced is thoroughly explained in Payton v. City of Anadarko, 179 Okla. 68 , 64 P. 2d 878 , and Board of County Com’rs, Tulsa County, v. Bilby, 174 Okla. 199 , 50 P. 2d 398 . … This theory, so far as it re-' lates to pecuniary gain, is fully developed in Board of Commissioners v. Bilby, supra.

Finkelstein v. City of Sapulpa

106 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1925

Rep. 655; Duncan Elec. & Ice Co. v. City of Duncan, 64 Okla. 211 , 166 Pac. 1084 ; Calkins v. Ponca City, 89 Okla. 100 , 214 Pac. 188 . In Calkins v. … Calkins v.

National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Ware

169 Okla. 618 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

W. v. Brown, 94 Okla. 277 , 221 P. 1017 , this court quoted with approval from the ease of Greenwood v. Royal Neighbors, 118 Va. 329 , 87 S. … W. v.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KOSS

2019 OK 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 2019

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Oklahoma Bar Association v. Brown Discussed oscn EMAIL: webmaster@oscn.net Oklahoma Judicial Center 2100 N Lincoln Blvd.

McFarland v. Atkins

594 P.2d 758 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1978

V. … See Holden Hospital Corporation v. Southern Illinois Hospital Corporation, 22 Ill.2d 150 , 174 N.E.2d 793 (1961); Ludlum v. Higbee, 11 N.J.Eq. 342 (1895); Clark v.

REYNOLDS v. FALLIN

2016 OK 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 2016

HAWKINS v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION Discussed 2007 OK 27 , 163 P.3d 512 , FENT v. CONTINGENCY REVIEW BOARD Discussed at Length 2008 OK 1 , 176 P.3d 1204 , DARROW v. INTEGRIS HEALTH, INC. … BOARD OF COM'RS OF HARMON COUNTY v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMM'N Discussed 1984 OK 12 , 679 P.2d 1296 , Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Bd. Discussed at Length Title 12.

Dickerson v. Incorporated Town of Eldorado

64 Okla. 142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1917

Corbin Oil Co. et al. v. Mull et al., 123 Ky. 763 , 97 S. W. 385 ; North Healdton Oil & Gas Co. v. Skelley et al., 59 Okla. 128 , 158 Pac. 1180 . In a case involving a similar principle (M., K. & T. R. Co. v. … Co. v. Garrison, 18 Okla. 461 , 90 Pac. 730 . In First National Bank of Byars v. Griffen et al., 31 Okla. 382 , 120 Pac. 595 , 49 L. R. A. (N.

Pimm v. Waldron

118 Okla. 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1926

This section of the statute was adopted from the state of Kansas, and in Continental Insurance Co. v. … of county commissioners for its approval of said sale, and for an order directing that deed for said property be executed by the chairman of said board.

Boswell v. Chambless

189 Okla. 112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1941

Defendant cites, as its principal authority, City of Bartlesville v. Keeler, 107 Okla. 14 , 229 P. 450 . … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. OSBORN and BAY-LESS, JJ., dissent.

Chambers v. Walker

85 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1922

In addition to the members of the school board, the county superintendent, Arthur Walker, is also made a party defendant. iC. S. … This was decided in the case of Fowler, County Supt. of Public Instruction, et al. v. Park et al., 79 Okla. 1 , 190 Pac. 668 .

Dancy v. Owens

126 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1927

Attorney General v. … Gen. v.

Oklahoma City v. McWilliams

108 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1925

The court further ordered the said defendants, the said board of city commissioners of Oklahoma City, state of Oklahoma, to pay to said plaintiff forthwith and immediately upon receipt of this writ, or cause to be paid to … Co. v. Hitchcock County et al. (Neb.) 84 N. W. 97 .

In Re Biggers

24 Okla. 842 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1909

In the case of Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591 , 16 Sup. Ct. 644, 40 L. Ed. 819 , that court said: “* * * jn Counselman v. … In re Brown, 2 Okla. 590, 39 Pac. 469 ; sections 232, 234, 235, Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. 1903.

Jacobson-Lampkin Paving Co. v. McMichael

277 P.2d 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1954

The principle of law relied upon by plaintiffs is well established, Oklahoma Title Co. v. Burrus, 172 Okl. 94 , 44 P.2d 852 ; S. & J. Supply Co. v. … First State Bank of Mangum v. Lock, 113 Okl. 30 , 237 P. 606 .

Smith v. Speed

55 L.R.A. 402 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1901

(Brown v. Buck, 75 Mich. 274 , 13 Am. St. Reps. p. 445.) … Rep. 381 ; Brown v. People, 19 Ill. 614 ; Bradley v. State, ex rel. Hill, (Ga.), 50 L. R.

Iralson v. Stang

18 Okla. 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1907

DeLong v. Stahl, 9 Kans. 558 ; Murray v. Kelley, 23 Kans. 666 ; Jones v. Kranks, 33 Kan. 487 ; Simpson v. Gregg, 5 Neb. 237 ; State, ex rel., v. Dunterman, et al. 30 Neb. 651 ; Light v. Kennard, 10 Neb. 330 ; Turner v. … Turner, 12 Neb. 161 ; Whalem v. Brennen, 34 Neb. 129 ; Gillespie v. Brown, 16 Neb. 457 ; School Dist. No. 1. v. Bishop, et al., 46 Neb. 850 ; Abbott v. Mathews, et al., 26 Mich. 176 ; Berier v. Wright, 30 Mich. 485 .