Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.73s

  • Roberts v. Mosier

    35 Okla. 691 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1913

    So, as suggested, something in the appearance, character, or history of the individual gave rise to the surname, such as his color, as black John, brown John, white John, afterwards transposed to John Brown, etc.; or it arose … See, also, Carlisle v. Peoples’ Bank, 122 Ala. 446 ; Pease v. Pease, 35 Conn. 131 ; Reddick v. State, 25 Fla. 112 ; Parmelee v. Raymond, 43 Ill. App. 609 ; Graham v. Eisner, 28 Ill. App. 269 ; Clark v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Hanes v. Coates

    193 Okla. 432 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1944

    (2) actually executed on the floor of such board or exchange, and (3) placed with or through a regular member in good standing of such board of trade or exchange. … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and HURST, JJ., concur. WELCH and DAVISON, JJ., absent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Butler

    770 P.2d 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1988

    Yamie v. Willmott, 184 Okl. 382 , 88 P.2d 325 (1939), Brown v. Barker, 35 Okl. 498 , 130 P. 155 (1913). … Brown v. Brown, 365 P.2d 385 (Okl.1961).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Spencer Development Co. v. Independent School District No. I-89

    58 O.B.A.J. 2298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1987

    No. 125 of Lincoln County v. Carrier, see note 2, supra; In re Wickstrum, 454 P.2d 660, 664 (Okla.1969); Oklahoma Farm Bureau v. State Board of Education, 444 P.2d 182, 187 (Okla.1968); Hatfield v. … In re Wickstrum, see note 5, supra; Musick v. State, 185 Okl. 140 , 90 P.2d 631, 634 (1938). . Burdick v. Independent School District, 702 P.2d 48, 53 (Okla.1985). . Board of Ed. of Ind. Sch. D. No. 48, Hughes County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Roberts

    40 Okla. 304 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1914

    See Brown v. Kimble, 5 Kan. 81; Edenfield v. Barnhart, 5 Kan. 225; Simpson v. Stein, 43 Kan. 35 , 22 Pac. 1020 ; Spaulding v. Polley, 28 Okla. 764 , 115 Pac. 864 ; Snyder v. … Elliott, 26 Okla. 856 , 110 Pac. 784 ; Simpson v. Kirschbaum, etc., 43 Kan. 36 , 22 Pac. 1018 ; Dolbee v. Hoover, 8 Kan. 124 ; Simpson v. Rothschild, 43 Kan. 33 , 22 Pac. 1019 ; Kansas Rolling Mill Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rhoton v. City of Norman

    466 P.2d 948 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1970

    Board of Education, Independent School District No. 1, Tulsa, Okla. v. Wright, Okl., 460 P.2d 422 . … Board of Education, Independent School Dist. No. 1, Tulsa, Okla. v. Wright, supra; Woods v. Perryman, Okl., 452 P.2d 588 ; Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Harris, Okl., 289 P.2d 147 ; King v. Carl B.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Culbertson v. Trope

    194 Okla. 146 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1944

    Winters v. Birch, 169 Okla. 237 , 36 P. 2d 907 ; Jepeway v. Barrett, 165 Okla. 220 , 25 P. 2d 661 . … Walters v. Rinnert, 167 Okla. 573 , 31 P. 2d 119 ; Brown v. Mudd, 173 Okla. 152 , 47 P. 2d 109 ; Swearingen v. McCartan, 186 Okla. 241 , 96 P. 2d 1061 . Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jenson v. Ward

    171 Okla. 279 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1935

    Brown and E. R. Brown. On the 2lst *281 day of November, 1913, E. R. Brown and C. E. Brown conveyed tbe land described in plaintiffs petition back to the plaintiff. … In the case of Murrow Indian Orphans’ Home v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • George v. Joint School District No. 5

    317 P.2d 251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1957

    Plaintiff asserts that our holdings in Board of Education v. Challey, 153 Okl. 273 , 5 P.2d 747 ; School District No. 36 Logan County v. Pippin, 134 Okl. 136 , 272 P. 455 ; School District No. 76 Creek County v. … Bath, 120 Okl. 204 , 250 P. 1003 ; and Barney v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ireton v. Saint Francis Hospital

    844 P.2d 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1992

    Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil Co., 394 P.2d 515, 520 (Okl.1964), Isbell v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. … Retirement and Pension Board of the Department of Public Safety, 603 P.2d 758 , 760 (Okl.1979), P & H Oilfield Service, Inc. v. Spectra Energy Corp., 823 P.2d 365 (Okl.1991), Jaco Production Company v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ford v. Coweta Hardware Co.

    49 Okla. 523 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1915

    In Ackerman v. C. C. … Brown v. Dunckel, 46 Mich. 29 , 8 N. W. 537 . We have examined the other assignments of error,, and find them to be without merit. For the reason stated, the judgment of the court, below is affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Zinc Company v. Thomas

    554 P.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1976

    This conclusion rests upon our decision in Brown Bros. v. Parks, 176 Okl. 615 , 56 P.2d 883 , which announced these rules: “1. … Circumstances disclosed bring this case within the rule stated in Brown Brothers v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • King v. J. E. Crosbie, Inc.

    191 Okla. 525 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1942

    City of Tulsa v. Frye, 165 Okla. 302 , 25 P. 2d 1080 ; Lewis v. City of Tulsa, 179 Okla. 176 , 64 P. 2d 675 ; Sanders v. First Nat. Bank of Pauls Valley, 183 Okla. 112 , 80 P. 2d 207 ; City of Norman v. … In the early case of City of Hugo v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • American Railway Express Co. v. Morris

    129 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1928

    MASON, V. C. J. This is an appeal bj the American Railway Express Company from a judgment in the principal sum of $1,500 -obtained against it by Thomas J. Morris in the district court of Stephens county. … Co. v. State of Washington, 270 U. S. 87 , 46 Sup. Ct. Rep. 279, considered and construed a statute of the state of Washington very similar to ours.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Union Mutual Insurance Company v. Hill

    356 P.2d 336 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1960

    Matherly v. Hamer, 174 Okl. 403 , 50 P.2d 619 ; Fox v. Dunning, 124 Okl. 228 , 255 P. 582 ; Getman-MacDonell-Summers Drug Co. v. Acosta, 162 Okl. 77 , 19 P.2d 149 ; Kaw Boiler Works v. … In Yellow Cab Co. et al. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Incorporated Town of Ryan v. Town of Waurika

    29 Okla. 655 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

    Nichols v. Board of County Canvassers, 129 N. Y. 395 , 29 N. E. 327 , 14 L. R. A. 624. See, also, the following authorities: Wright v. State Board of Canvassers, 76 S. Car. 574, 57 S. E. 536 ; Major v. … In Londoner v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. State Bank of Commerce

    123 Okla. 127 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1926

    Bank of Commerce of Ralston v. Gaskill, 44 Okla. 728 , 145 Pac. 1131 ; Frick-Reid Supply Co. v. Hunter, 47 Okla. 151 , 148 Pac. 83 ; Case v. Posey, 55 Okla. 163 , 154 Pac. 1165 ; Remarkis v. … Fonville, 19 Okla. 283 , 91 Pac. 902 ; Guss v. Federal Trust Co., 19 Okla. 138 , 91 Pac. 1045 . See Eves Tall Chief v. Aaron, 87 Okla. 230 , 209 Pac. 915 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Childers

    196 Okla. 339 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1945

    State Board of Affairs, 194 Okla. 495 , 153 P. 2d 235 ; Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U. S. 388 , 55 S. Ct. 241 , 79 L. Ed. 446 ; 42 Am. Jur., Public Administrative Law, sec. 44. … E. 2d 807 ; State Highway Board v. Gates, 110 Vt. 67 , 1 Atl. 2d 825. Plaintiff and intervener rely principally upon the case of Peabody v. Russell, 302 Ill. 111 , 134 N. E. 150 , 20 A. L.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Langston City v. Gustin

    191 Okla. 93 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1942

    The defendants adversely affected by the portion of the decision determining Brown’s superior rights as against them have not. … Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Williamson v. Longmire

    281 P.2d 949 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1955

    See Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okl. 169 , 170 P.2d 200 ; Taylor v. Langley, 188 Okl. 646 , 112 P.2d 411 . … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.