Case law

Application of Murga

631 P.2d 735 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1981

Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580, 586 , 72 S.Ct. 512, 517 , 96 L.Ed. 586 , 597 (1952). See also Okla.Const. art. 2, §§ 7, 20. 5 . Parra v. Page, 430 P.2d 834, 837 (Okl.Cr.1967); United States ex rel. Negron v. … Little v. County Excise Board, 161 Okl. 40, 42 , 16 P.2d 1080, 1082 (1932); Riley v. Carter, 165 Okl. 262, 262 , 25 P.2d 666, 667 (1933) (syllabus); State ex rel. Wall v.

In Re Unborn Child of Starks

72 O.B.A.J. 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 2001

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22, n. 30 , 989 P.2d 448, 456, n. 30 . … Michigan v.

Aggers v. Bridges

31 Okla. 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1912

Aggers, will take notice that he has been sued in the above named court upon an open account for board bill and on account of team work and must answer petition filed therein by said plaintiff on or before the 26th day of … Mortgage Trust Co. of Pennsylvania v. Norris, 8 Kan. App. 699 , 54 Pac. 283 ; Lindsey v. Board, 56 Kan. 630 , 44 Pac. 603 ; Spaulding et al. v.

Bush v. Bush

142 Okla. 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1930

Ed. 84 ; Towson v. Moore, 173 U. S. 17 , 19 S. Ct. 332 , 43 L. Ed. 597 ; Sawyer v. White, 122 Fed. 223 , 58 C. C. A. 587 ; Meyer v. Jacobs, 123 Fed. 900 . … The court cites and relies upon Studdard v. Wells, 120 Mo. 25 ; Taylor v. Crockett, 123 Mo. 300 ; Brown v. Fickle, 135 Mo. 405 .

S.K.W. v. STATE

508 P.3d 449 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 2022

Supp. 2019 §18 Holder v. State , 2009 OK CIV APP 1 219 P.3d 562 Olson v. … Holder v. State , 2009 OK CIV APP 1 219 P.3d 562 Olson v.

Corrigan v. Oklahoma Coal Co.

68 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1918

Ry. co. v. … 'his superior, he was required to board 'this train.

Nesbitt v. Apple

891 P.2d 1235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1995

In Kelly v. … O’Hara v.

Caldwell v. Cambron

417 P.2d 568 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1966

Brown Co. v. Clause, 205 Okl. 122 , 235 P.2d 680 , at page 685: “It was the function of the jury to properly evaluate these matters. … JACKSON, V. C. J., and DAVISON, J., concur in result. BLACKBIRD and HODGES, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part. SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION HALLEY, Chief Justice. Lonnie W. Brown, one of the attorneys for H. F.

Campbell v. Reynolds

167 Okla. 365 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 20, 1934

Reynolds to vacate the office-of member of the board of education of the-city of Maud from ward 2 of said city. … City of Sapulpa v. Harris, Judge, 143 Okla. 69 , 287 P. 1041 ; Parker v. U. S. Smelter Co., 80 Okla. 129 , 194 P. 897 . The appeal is therefore dismissed

Miles v. Parkinson

196 Okla. 414 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1946

Miles v. Parkinson et al. 193 Okla. 380 , 142 P. 2d 856 . … In Conard v. Darnell et al., 114 Okla. 48 , 242 P. 772 (cited with approval in Gragg v.

Kardokus v. Walsh

797 P.2d 322 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1990

Ahboah v. Housing Auth. of Kiowa Tribe, 660 P.2d 625 (Okla.1983); Goforth v. State, 644 P.2d 114 (Okla.Crim.App.1982). … Buckles v. Wil-Mc Oil Corp., 585 P.2d 1360 (Okla.1978); Layton v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, 383 P.2d 624 (Okla.1963).

City of Bartlesville v. Riggs

114 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1925

Davis & Younger, 18 Okla. 429 , 90 Pac. 865 ; City of Muskogee v. Rambo, 40 Okla. 672 , 138 Pac. 567 ; Hancock v. City of Muskogee 66 Okla. 195 , 108 Pac. 445 ; City of Bartlesville v. … Hall v. Sedalia, 232 Mo. 344 , 134 S. W. 650 ; McChesney v. Village of Hyde Park. 151 Ill. 634 , 37 N. E. 858 ; Fisher v. Chicago, 213 Ill. 268 , 72 N. E. 680 . “In the case of Johnson v. Duer, 115 Mo. 366 , 21 S.

BERKSON v. STATE ex rel. ASKINS AS ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS

2023 OK 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 2023

See , e.g. , Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841 Dani v. Miller , 2016 OK 35 374 P.3d 779 See , e.g. , Nicholson v. … Southon v. Okla. Tire Recyclers, LLC , 2019 OK 37 443 P.3d 566 Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7 85 P.3d 841

Gloyd v. Morris

42 Okla. 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1914

Co. v. Board of Education of City of Shawnee et al., 39 Okla. 716 , 136 Pac. 595 ; Hutchinson v. Krueger et al., 34 Okla. 23 , 124 Pac. 591 , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 315; Minnetonka Lumber Co. et al. v. … Board of Education of City of Sapulpa, 41 Okla. 541 , 139 Pac. 284 . The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

In Re Annexation of Reno Quartermaster Depot Military Reservation to Independent School District No. 34

180 Okla. 274 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1937

of public instruction of the county in which such military reservations and independent school districts are situated, upon the petition of the commanding officer of the military reservation and with the consent of the board … J., BAYLESS, V. C. X, and RILEY, BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, GIBSON, and HURST, JX, concur.

Mitchell v. Murphy

171 Okla. 326 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1935

Haskell v. McClintic-Marshall Co., 289 F. 405 ; Headley v. Aetna Insurance Company, 202 Ala. 384 , 80 So. 466 ; Imperial Motorcar Co. v. Skinner, 16 Ala. App. 443 , 78 So. 641 ; Tomlinson v. … Brown, Charles R. Bostick, and M. A. Breebenridge in the preparation of this opinion.

Childrens Home & Welfare Ass'n v. Childers

197 Okla. 243 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1946

In Hawks v. Bland, 156 Okla. 48 , 9 P. 2d 720 , we said that such gifts were “gratuitous transfers of property of the state voluntarily and without consideration.” … See, also, Carter v. Thomas, 172 Okla. 558 , 46 P. 2d 460 .

Nance v. State

122 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

Brown v. Oklahoma City, 107 Okla. 252 , 231 Pac. 855 .

Tansel v. Storm

40 Okla. 363 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1913

Jenny et al. v. Brook, 6 A. & E. (N. S.) 322, was trespass for breaking and entering plaintiff’s close and destroying his trees, bushes, shrubs, etc. … See, also, Kutz v. McCune, 22 Wis. 628 , 99 Am. Dec. 85 .

De Lozier v. Collier

104 Okla. 19 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1924

The case of Mulligan v. … In other words we seem to adhere to the common-law, and, as decided in Montgomery v.