Case law

In Re Osmond

174 Okla. 561 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1935

OSBORN, V. C. J. This is an action to review a report and recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar recommending disbarment of J. W. Osmond, hereinafter referred to as respondent. … State ex rel. v. Ledbetter, 127 Okla. 85 , 200 P. 454 ; In re Green, 173 Okla. 400 , 49 P. (2d) 197 .

Kardokus v. Walsh

797 P.2d 322 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1990

Ahboah v. Housing Auth. of Kiowa Tribe, 660 P.2d 625 (Okla.1983); Goforth v. State, 644 P.2d 114 (Okla.Crim.App.1982). … Buckles v. Wil-Mc Oil Corp., 585 P.2d 1360 (Okla.1978); Layton v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, 383 P.2d 624 (Okla.1963).

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

164 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1933

No. 49 v. Wolfe County Supt., 94 Okla. 87 , 221 P. 42 . The second reason for denying the protest is equally untenable. In St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Bonaparte, 142 Okla. 177 , 286 P. 343 , has held that such a statute is unconstitutional as being in violation of section 26, art. 10, of the Constitution.

Butte v. Routh

66 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1917

Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown, 19 Okla. 77 , 91 Pac. 849 ; Taby v. McMurray, 30 Okla. 602 , 120 Pac. 664 ; Butler v. McSpadden, 25 Okla. 465 , 107 Pac. 170 ; Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469 , 106 Pac. 957 ; Buckner v. … Co. v. Prichard, 25 Okla. 808 , 108 Pac. 360 ; School Dist. v. Shelton, 26 Okla. 229 , 109 Pac. 67 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 962 ; Flanagan v. Davis, 27 Okla. 422 , 112 Pac. 990 ; Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v.

Paine v. City of Guymon

199 Okla. 336 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1947

In Warren v. … Co. v. City of Wetumka, supra.

State Ex Rel. Woods v. Cole

178 Okla. 567 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1936

This court held in Board of Education v. … It is held that as to certain services, and generally, the county cannot employ an attorney as in Board of Com’rs v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 P. 565 , and Board of County Com’rs v.

Mitchell v. Bruce

85 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1922

Baber v. Overton, 80 Okla. 128 194 Pac. 893 ; Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Oklahoma, 177 Pac. 570; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 Pac. 707 .

Pine v. Baker

76 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1919

And the case of Henig v. Gilmore (Kan.) 6 Pac. 304 , holding to the same effect. The case of Olen v. … This court in the case of Town of Afton v.

J. Crouch & Son v. Huber

87 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1922

Moore et al. v. Kelly, 57 Okla. 348 , 157 Pac. 81 . Also by other courts, see Brown v. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co., 128 U. S. 403 , 32 L. Ed. 468 ; Thayer v. Star Mining Co., 105 Ill. 540 ; Cughan v. … W. 1088 ; Kansas Lumber Co. v. Horrigan, 36 Kan. 387 , 13 Pac. 564 ; Barber Medicine Co. v. Bradley, 48 Okla. 82 , 150 Pac. 127 ; Brown v. Gordon-Tiger Mining & Reduction Co.

Commercial Investment Trust v. Ferguson

96 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1923

Perry v. Snyder, 75 Okla. 24 , 181 Pac. 147 . … Fullerton-Stuart Lumber Co. v. Badger, 59 Okla. 135 , 158 Pnc. 370; Young v. Missouri, O. & G. R. Co., 44 Okla. 611 , 145 Pac. 1118 ; Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Taylor v.

City of Ponca City v. Edwards

460 P.2d 418 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1969

Lee v. Norick, Okl., 447 P.2d 1015 . The municipal parking facility is to be a downtown Ponca City parking lot in accordance with Resolution No. 2478 of the Board of Commissioners of the City of Ponca City. … In Pitts v. Allen, 138 Okl. 295 , 281 P. 126 , we held that a city charter provision prevails over a conflicting state statute in a case involving a public utility.

Holcombe v. Major County

173 Okla. 539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

Plaintiff cites Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County v. … However, this phase of the ease is not of importance, for it was held in Board of Commis- *541 sioncrs of Garfield Comity v.

Edmondson v. Francisco, Road Sup'r.

41 Okla. 556 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1914

In Good et al. v. … Nor is this opinion in conflict with the decision of this court in Mills v.

Special Indemnity Fund v. Scott

652 P.2d 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1982

Penney v. Crumby, 584 P.2d 1325 (Okl.1978); Special Indemnity Fund v. Lee, 550 P.2d 568 (Okl.1976); Special Indemnity Fund v. Wade, 199 Okl. 547 , 189 P.2d 609 (1948). … Penney Co. v. Crumby, 584 P.2d 1325 (Okl. 1978). 2 .

Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. County Treasurer of Tulsa Co.

110 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1925

The estimate for current expenses as approved by the excise board is the basic support for the tax levy. Any tax levy in excess • of the approved estimate for current expenses is null and void. Nelson, Sheriff, v. Okla. … Co. v. Wiggins, 5 Okla. 477 , 49 Pac. 1019 ; Wiggins, Co. Treas., v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 9 Okla. 118 , 59 Pac. 248 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 35 Okla. 138 , 128 Pac. 685 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.

Clark v. Holmes

31 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

Parke v. Brown et al., 12 Ill. App. 291 , was error to reverse a decree -pro confesso. … See, also, Leforce v. Haymes, 25 Okla. 190 , 105 Pac. 644 ; Wheatland Grain, etc., Co. v.

In Re Jeter

163 Okla. 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1933

We conclude that the finding- of fact of the Board of Governors of the State Bar-is amply supported by the evidence, and we approve the same. … V. O. X. and SWINDALL. ANDREWS. McNEILL. OSBORN, BAYLESS, and BUSBY. XT., concur.

City of Oklahoma City v. Haskell, Governor

27 Okla. 495 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

On the Governor’s refusal to appoint the board of appraisers provided for, this action was brought to secure a writ of mandamus to compel him to do so. … Attorney General v. A. H. Huston (infra), an opinion of tins court recently delivered, and it would be of no practical value to further discuss or reiterate the reasoning of that case.

Lindsey v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORR.

593 P.2d 1088 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1979

In Cleveland Board of Education v. … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968) ; Buckley v. Coyle Public School System, 476 F.2d 92 (10th Cir.1973) ; Donahue v. Staunton, 471 F.2d 475 (7th Cir.1972) . [8] Thompson v.

Adair v. Clay

780 P.2d 650 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1989

Board of Com’rs of Oklahoma County v. Ryan, 107 Okla. 278 , 232 P. 834 (1925); Board of Com’rs v. Hammerly, 85 Okla. 53 , 204 P. 445 (1922). … Bd. of Equal, v. School Dist. No. 1, supra; Continental Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 570 P.2d 315, 319 (Okla.1977) and Blake v.