Case law

S.K.W. v. STATE

508 P.3d 449 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 2022

Supp. 2019 §18 Holder v. State , 2009 OK CIV APP 1 219 P.3d 562 Olson v. … Holder v. State , 2009 OK CIV APP 1 219 P.3d 562 Olson v.

In Re Osmond

174 Okla. 561 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1935

OSBORN, V. C. J. This is an action to review a report and recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar recommending disbarment of J. W. Osmond, hereinafter referred to as respondent. … State ex rel. v. Ledbetter, 127 Okla. 85 , 200 P. 454 ; In re Green, 173 Okla. 400 , 49 P. (2d) 197 .

Kardokus v. Walsh

797 P.2d 322 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1990

Ahboah v. Housing Auth. of Kiowa Tribe, 660 P.2d 625 (Okla.1983); Goforth v. State, 644 P.2d 114 (Okla.Crim.App.1982). … Buckles v. Wil-Mc Oil Corp., 585 P.2d 1360 (Okla.1978); Layton v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, 383 P.2d 624 (Okla.1963).

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

164 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1933

No. 49 v. Wolfe County Supt., 94 Okla. 87 , 221 P. 42 . The second reason for denying the protest is equally untenable. In St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Bonaparte, 142 Okla. 177 , 286 P. 343 , has held that such a statute is unconstitutional as being in violation of section 26, art. 10, of the Constitution.

Butte v. Routh

66 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1917

Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown, 19 Okla. 77 , 91 Pac. 849 ; Taby v. McMurray, 30 Okla. 602 , 120 Pac. 664 ; Butler v. McSpadden, 25 Okla. 465 , 107 Pac. 170 ; Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469 , 106 Pac. 957 ; Buckner v. … Co. v. Prichard, 25 Okla. 808 , 108 Pac. 360 ; School Dist. v. Shelton, 26 Okla. 229 , 109 Pac. 67 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 962 ; Flanagan v. Davis, 27 Okla. 422 , 112 Pac. 990 ; Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v.

City of Ponca City v. Edwards

460 P.2d 418 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1969

Lee v. Norick, Okl., 447 P.2d 1015 . The municipal parking facility is to be a downtown Ponca City parking lot in accordance with Resolution No. 2478 of the Board of Commissioners of the City of Ponca City. … In Pitts v. Allen, 138 Okl. 295 , 281 P. 126 , we held that a city charter provision prevails over a conflicting state statute in a case involving a public utility.

Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.

732 P.2d 438 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1986

Brown, Scott D. Boughton, Brown and Lockhart, Oklahoma City, for appellant Cotton Petroleum Corp. Gretchen Hoover, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Leslie Wilson Pepper, Asst. Gen. … Queen City Lodge No. 197, I.O.O.F., Okl. 131, 156 P.2d 340, 358 [1945]; Gibson v. Phillips University, 195 Okl. 456 , 158 P.2d 901, 903 [1945]; Board of Equalization v. Tulsa Pythian Benev.

State Ex Rel. Woods v. Cole

178 Okla. 567 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1936

This court held in Board of Education v. … It is held that as to certain services, and generally, the county cannot employ an attorney as in Board of Com’rs v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 P. 565 , and Board of County Com’rs v.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Huston

111 Okla. 274 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1925

Co. v. … Co. v.

Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. County Treasurer of Tulsa Co.

110 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1925

The estimate for current expenses as approved by the excise board is the basic support for the tax levy. Any tax levy in excess • of the approved estimate for current expenses is null and void. Nelson, Sheriff, v. Okla. … Co. v. Wiggins, 5 Okla. 477 , 49 Pac. 1019 ; Wiggins, Co. Treas., v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 9 Okla. 118 , 59 Pac. 248 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 35 Okla. 138 , 128 Pac. 685 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.

Mitchell v. Bruce

85 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1922

Baber v. Overton, 80 Okla. 128 194 Pac. 893 ; Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Oklahoma, 177 Pac. 570; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 Pac. 707 .

In Re Application of State

33 Okla. 797 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1912

Frankton, 142 Ind. 546 , 41 N.E. 1031 ; Board of Commissioners of Perry Co. v. Gardner, 155 Ind. 165 , 57 N.E. 908 ; Grant v. City of Davenport, 36 Iowa, 396 ; French et al. v. … Joseph Waterworks Co., 57 Or. 586 , 111 P. 864 , 112 P. 1083 ; Brown v. City of Corry, 175 Pa. 528 , 34 A. 854 ; Dallas Elect. Co. v. Dallas, 23 Tex. Civ. App. 323 , 58 S.W. 153 ; Tyler v.

Mills v. Grotheer

69 O.B.A.J. 1425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1998

Colorado Permanente Medical Group, 902 P.2d 867, 874 (Colo.Ct.App.1995) (expert’s position on board of directors of defendant’s insurer made it more probable that he was biased); Golden v. … ,” Evans, 902 P.2d at 874 , see also Barsema, 751 P.2d at 973 (expert’s position as vice president and member of board); 2) the fact that the witness is an employee of defendant’s insurer, see Charter v.

Holcombe v. Major County

173 Okla. 539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

Plaintiff cites Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County v. … However, this phase of the ease is not of importance, for it was held in Board of Commis- *541 sioncrs of Garfield Comity v.

Edmondson v. Francisco, Road Sup'r.

41 Okla. 556 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1914

In Good et al. v. … Nor is this opinion in conflict with the decision of this court in Mills v.

Special Indemnity Fund v. Scott

652 P.2d 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1982

Penney v. Crumby, 584 P.2d 1325 (Okl.1978); Special Indemnity Fund v. Lee, 550 P.2d 568 (Okl.1976); Special Indemnity Fund v. Wade, 199 Okl. 547 , 189 P.2d 609 (1948). … Penney Co. v. Crumby, 584 P.2d 1325 (Okl. 1978). 2 .

Hartley v. Riley

85 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1922

This principle of law is stated in the ease of Colonial Jewelry Company v. Brown et al., 38 Okla. 44 , 131 Pac. 1077 . … To the same effect are Kelly v. Brown, 55 Okla. 628 , 155 Pac. 590 ; Haizlip v. Whitfield, 56 Okla. 42 , 155 Pac. 863 ; Gilkeson v. Callahan, 62 Okla. 45 , 161 Pac. 789 ; Falls City Clothing Co. v.

In Re Jeter

163 Okla. 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1933

We conclude that the finding- of fact of the Board of Governors of the State Bar-is amply supported by the evidence, and we approve the same. … V. O. X. and SWINDALL. ANDREWS. McNEILL. OSBORN, BAYLESS, and BUSBY. XT., concur.

Lindsey v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORR.

593 P.2d 1088 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1979

In Cleveland Board of Education v. … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968) ; Buckley v. Coyle Public School System, 476 F.2d 92 (10th Cir.1973) ; Donahue v. Staunton, 471 F.2d 475 (7th Cir.1972) . [8] Thompson v.

Lockett v. Construction Trades Union A. F. of L.

207 Okla. 484 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1952

To support plaintiff’s contention as to the secondary boycott, he relies upon the following cases: National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. & Const. Trades Council, 71 S. … Ct. 943 , 341 U.S. 675 , International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 501, A.F. of L. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 341 U.S. 694 , 71 S. Ct. 954 , 95 L.