Case law

FARRIS v. MASQUELIER

2022 OK 91 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 2022

Sellars v. … . § 105.5 Sellars v. McCullough , 1989 OK 155 784 P.2d 1060 Bane v.

Bettis v. Cargile

34 Okla. 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1912

Devault v. Merchants’ Exch. Co., 22 Okla. 624 . 98 Pac. 342 ; Bettis v. Cargile, 23 Okla. 301, 100 Pac. 436 . … Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Martin v. Gassert, 17 Okla. 177 , 87 Pac. 586 .

In Re Arbuckle Master Conservancy Dist, District Ct., Murray Cty., No 9660

474 P.2d 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1970

Also see Green v. City of Mt. Pleasant, 256 Iowa 1184 , 131 N.W.2d 5 ; Zilesch v. Polk County, 107 Or. 659 , 215 P. 578 . The statutes refer to municipality or other local interest. … Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, Okl., 464 P.2d 748 . *393 The Arbuckle project was developed as a local project.

Wilson Co. v. Russell

144 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1930

Taylor v. … McClintock v. Parrish, 72 Okla. 260 , 180 Pac. 689 ; George W. Brown & Sons State) Bank v. Polen, 132 Okla. 121 , 270 Pac. 9 . It was also determined in the Brown Case, supra; “An absolute sale, to the exclusion of!

Knox v. Krause

140 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1929

Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Okla. 298 , 177 Pac. 670 ; Davis v. Lambard-Hart Realty & Investment Co., 88 Okla. 301 , 213 Pac. 78 ; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 Pac. 707 ; Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v.

McFarling v. Demco, Inc.

546 P.2d 625 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1976

Co. v. American Indem. Co., Mo., 440 S.W. 2d 932 ; Allstate Insur. Co. v. Smoak, 256 S.C. 382 , 182 S.E.2d 749 ; Chesapeake House, Inc. v. Lee Mut. Ins. Agency, Inc., Fla.App., 239 So.2d 602 ; Galiher v. … Coon v. Jones, Okl., 303 P. 2d 425 (1956); Smith v. Owens, Okl., 397 P.2d 673 (1965).

Darnell v. Higgins

124 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1926

Freeling v. … Commissioners of Garfield County v.

Thompson v. STATE EX REL. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF OKL. PUB. EMP. RETIR. SYS.

264 P.3d 1251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 2011

Thompson's retirement benefits. 14 In the Board's Findings of Fact, it determined that Mr. … In Woods v.

Conway v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.

669 P.2d 766 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1983

In Reirdon v. … I-95 of Grant City v.

Pancoast v. Eldridge

178 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1935

Brown, deceased, covering his accounts from the date of his appointment on January 3, 1925, to December 10, 1932.' … J., OSBORN, V. O. J., and RILEY, WELCH, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Bilby v. Cochran

47 Okla. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1915

BROWN, J. Suit was instituted in the district court by defendants in error against plaintiff in error, N. V. Bilby, upon a promissory note. The petition was styled “G. C. Cochran and C. W. … V. Bilby.”

Mitchell v. Bruce

85 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1922

Baber v. Overton, 80 Okla. 128 194 Pac. 893 ; Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Oklahoma, 177 Pac. 570; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 Pac. 707 .

Blake v. Metz

136 Okla. 146 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1929

In Glover et al. v. Warner, supra, a quotation from Farmers & Merchants Bank of Phoenix, Ariz., v. … “And section 9969, Id , provides chac: “ ‘The remedies of resort to the boards and appeal therefrom shall be the sole remedies for the correction of assessment or equalization.’ ” In view of the rule announced in Blake v.

Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. Blake

133 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1928

of 13.71 mills, and that the excessive mil age levied and collected resulted from the fact that the balance sheet of the estimate approved by the excise board did not reflect the true financial condition of the county on … No 'extended discussion of the question here presented is necessary for the reason that it has recently been determined by this court adversely to plaintiff's contention in the case of Albrecht v. Jones, Co.

Bagby v. Trustees of the Claremore Junior College Authority

525 P.2d 1355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1974

The acceptance of the beneficial interest in the trust was made by the Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County. … Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of Highways (1963), Okl., 385 P.2d 868 ; and Edwards v. Hanna Lumber *1357 Company (1966), Okl., 415 P.2d 980 .

Chetopa Motor Co. v. Douglas

132 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1928

In the case of Federal National Bank v. … In the case of McIver v.

Whitson v. City of Ada

171 Okla. 491 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1935

Lackey et al. v. State ex rel. Grant, 29 Okla. 255 , 116 P. 913 ; State ex rel. Burns v. Linn, 49 Okla. 526 , 153 P. 826 , Ann Cas. 1918B, 139; Bodine v. Oklahoma City, 97 Okla. 106 , 187 P. 209 ; Owen et al. v. … Seminole Townsite Co. v. Town of Seminole, 35 Okla. 554 , 130 P. 1098 ; Santa Rosa, etc., v. Central Street Ry. Co., 4 Cal. Unrep. 950 , 38 P. 986 , City of Atchison v.

Practical Products Corp. v. Brightmire

63 O.B.A.J. 3499 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1992

United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co., 113 F.2d 194, 200 (10th Cir.1940); Bd. of Educ. of Indep. School Dist. No. 20 v. Adams, 465 P.2d 464, 467 (Okla.1970). … Spiller v. Massey & Moore, 406 P.2d 467, 473 (Okla.1965); Jones v. Goldberger, 323 P.2d 344, 347 (Okla.1958).

Bd. of County Com. of Caddo County v. Novy

298 P.2d 1046 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1956

Petitti v. State, 2 Okl.Cr. 131 , 100 P. 1122, 1123 . … Livingston v. Livingston, 213 N.C. 797 , 197 S.E. 597 . The entry of-judgment upon the second verdict was error. Abraham v. Superior Court, 50 R.I. 207 , 146 A. 617 , 66 A.L.R. 533 ; Murry v.

Nesbitt v. Apple

891 P.2d 1235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1995

In Kelly v. … O’Hara v.