Case law

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McAlester

39 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 6, 1913

Co. v. … Cas. 452-456, will be found more recent cases, to the same effect, upon the question of the duties of a railroad company to a person attending a passenger boarding a train. In C., R. I. & P. Co. v.

EZZELL v. LACK

480 P.3d 906 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 2021

The setting of a special municipal election, which must be conducted by the county election board under the oversight of the State Election Board, is not a matter of local concern. … It is clear that, as the Secretary of the Oklahoma County Election Board testified at length, the election board requires a minimum of 60 days to prepare adequately for an election.

Wellston Consolidated School District No. 1 v. Matthews

104 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1924

Provided, further, that the school board may I>rovide motor transportation for pupils as provided in this Act, which may be either hired or purchased by the school board of said consolidated district.” … And the portion which is especial1 v ner-tinent in this cause is. that which provides : “And in addition it shall lie the duty of said district board to provide!

Cranmer v. Williamson

8 Okla. 683 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1899

(Weber v. Dillion, 54 Pac. 894 , 7 Okla. 568 .) But, as the demurrer does not raise this question, we will not consider it. … As to the power of the territorial board of equalization to raise the valuation of any county, we entertain no doubt; but that board deals with all of the property of the county as a whole, and if, in raising the assessed

Yeager v. Shelton

29 Okla. 667 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

Yeager, against the defendants, “as and constituting the county election board of Tulsa county,” praying a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring said board and its secretary to accept and file petitioner’s nominating petition … Reece v. Cheney et al., 28 Okla. 501 . It is so ordered. All the Justices concur.

Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

206 Okla. 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1952

See Application of Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 195 Okla. 641 , 161 P. 2d 447 ; Application of Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 200 Okla. 442 , 195 P. 2d 936 ; Application of Board of Regents for … See Sheldon v. G.R.D.A., 182 Okla. 24 , 76 P. 2d 355 , and State v. G.R.D.A., 195 Okla. 8 , 154 P. 2d 946 .

Wiseman v. Boren

545 P.2d 753 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1976

McCain v. State Election Board, 144 Okl. 85 , 289 P. 759 (1930), quoted with approval in Hines v. Winters, 320 P.2d 1114 (Okl.1957); Leininger v. Ward-Beekman & Brooks, Inc., 139 Okl. 292 , 282 P. 467 (1929). … The second syllabus of this Court’s decision in State v. State Election Board of Oklahoma, 318 P.2d 422 (Okl.1957), states: “2.

City of Shawnee v. Exchange National Co.

185 Okla. 451 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1939

In the case of First National Bank in Wichita v. … WELCH, V. C. J., dissents. RILEY, J., absent.

Acevedo v. City of Muskogee

66 O.B.A.J. 1341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1995

Acevedo appealed to the City’s Merit Board (Board) arguing that he was not discharged for the reasons given by the chief of police in his termination letter. … Myers, see note 2, 461 U.S. at 143-46 , 103 S.Ct. at 1688-89 , supra; Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 572-74 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1737 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). . Waters v.

Tulsa County v. Moore

182 Okla. 330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1938

This section was construed in the case of Board of Com’rs of Canadian Co. v. … J., BAYLESS, V. C. J., and WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. RILEY and HURST, JJ., dissent.

In Re State Question No. 168

157 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

Within five days after the receipt of the notice of approval by the Attorney General, or of a revised or amended title from him, the Secretary of State shall transmit to the Secretary of the State Election Board an attested … CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Town of Wellston

47 Okla. 417 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

A. 287 ; Simons v. Wittmann, 113 Mo. App. 357 , 88 S. W. 791 . … Public Schools v. Bennett, 27 N. J. Law, 513, 517, 72 Am. Dec. 373 , 374; Tompkins v. Dudley, 25 N. Y. 272 , 82 Am. Dec. 349 ; Bartlett v. Bisbey, 27 Tex. Civ. App. 405, 408 , 66 S.

Corlee v. Cory

186 Okla. 543 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1940

The evidence discloses that Cliff Schlosser presented his separate bid for the paint work to be done on said building to the board of education of the city of El Reno, and that his bid was accepted by the board of education … WELCH, V. C. J., and CORN, GIBSON, HURST, and DANNER, JJ., concur.

Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin

127 Okla. 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1927

In the case of Mitchell v. … Baber v. Overton, 80 Okla. 128 , 194 Pac. 893 ; Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Okla. 298 , 177 Pac. 570 ; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 Pac. 707 .”

Hill v. Turnverein Germania of Oklahoma City

77 Okla. 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1920

In the case of Wade v. … Blanchard v. Reed, 67 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 644 ; Holt v. Spicer, 65 Oklahoma, 162 Pac. 686 ; Moore v. Brown, 11 How. 414 , 13 L. Ed. 751 ; 37 Cyc. 1507.

Hathaway v. MEDICAL RESEARCH & TECH. AUTH.

49 P.3d 740 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 2002

NOTES [1] The State did not seek dismissal of the action in its answer filed July 10, 2000. [2] Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 ; Neil Acquisition, LLC v. … Board of County Comm'rs, 1988 OK 15 , ¶ 10, 755 P.2d 615 . [38] Carswell v.

Cheeves v. City of Duncan

208 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1953

In support of this, proposition he relies on our opinion in Darst v. County Election Board of Craig County, 194 Okl. 469 , 152 P.2d 912 . The Darst case construed 26 O.S.1951 § 162. … Construing the election laws as applied to cities of the first class, in the case of Adair v.

Levin v. Cook

84 Okla. 55 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1921

J., section 482, pages 621, 522, and 623; Union Trust Co. v. Shelby Downard Asphalt Co., 66 Okla. 251 , 156 Pac. 903 ; Nelson v. Reynolds, 59 Okla. 168 , 158 Pac. 301 ; Brown et al. v. … J., section 987, pages 780, 781; Brown et al. v. Coppadge et al., 54 Okla. 88 , 153 Pac. 817 .

Pelican Production Corp. v. Mize

573 P.2d 703 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1977

The Board denied the variance and Pelican appealed to the District Court where, after trial de novo, judgment was entered affirming the order of the Board denying the variance. Pelican then appealed to this Court. … In Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v.

Bettis v. Cargile

34 Okla. 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1912

Devault v. Merchants’ Exch. Co., 22 Okla. 624 . 98 Pac. 342 ; Bettis v. Cargile, 23 Okla. 301, 100 Pac. 436 . … Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Martin v. Gassert, 17 Okla. 177 , 87 Pac. 586 .