Case law

Melton v. A. C. F. Wrigley, Inc.

365 P.2d 557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1961

State Industrial Commission, 156 Okl. 160 , 9 P.2d 933 ; Mobley v. Brown, 151 Okl. 167 , 2 P. 2d 1034 , 83 A.L.R. 1014 . … Skelly Oil Company v. Waters, supra; Rider v. Bob Pliner Service Station, Okl., 321 P.2d 378 ; Plaza Grill v. Webster, 182 Okl. 533 , 78 P.2d 818 ; Mobley v. Brown, supra, Hurley v.

Smith v. Young & Schiffer

13 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1903

The same question was before this court in the case of Watkins v. … We have carefully re-examined the case of Watkins v. Grieser, supra, and are fully satisfied with the decision and opinion in that case.

Wallace v. L. D. Clark & Son

74 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1918

In support of the doctrine announced by the defendant in error, the following authorities are cited: Brown v. Baird, 5 Okla. 133 , 48 Pac. 180 ; Brown v. Davidson, 42 Okla. 598 , 142 Pac. 387 ; Talley v. … Co. v. Brown et al., 28 Okla. 436 , 114 Pac. 1102 , 34 L. R. A. (N.

Kiowa County Bank v. Horart Ice & Coal Co.

18 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1907

Sawyer Lumber Co. v. Champlin Lumber Co. 16 Okla. 90 ; Crossly, et al. v. Couch, 15 Okla. 622 ; Rogers v. Brown, 15 Okla. 524 ; Refs v. Gray, 15 Okla. 484 ; Garretson v. Witherspoon, 15 Okla. 473 ; Hanover Bank v. … Henke, 15 Okla. 631 ; Exendine v. Goldstine, 14 Okla. 100 ; Frame v. Ryel, 14 Okla. 536 . From an examination of the record it appears that the judgment is probably correct and that no injustice has been done.

Overstreet v. Keith

185 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1939

Our present interpretation of “the commencement of proceedings” is supported by what was said in Green v. … WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

In Re Stolper

185 Okla. 459 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1939

The Board of Governors of the State Bar have recommended that J. H. Stolper be disbarred. … J., WELCH, V. O. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, CORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. GIBSON and DANNER, JJ., absent.

Connor v. Tailor & Leaverette

33 Okla. 733 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1912

It is insisted by plaintiff in error that the execution was not issued upon a final judgment, citing Houston v. Brown, 5 Ind. T. 361 , 82 S. W. 775 , and Case v. Ingle, 2 Ind. T. 309 , 51 S. W. 958 . … . * * * ” In the opinion it is said: “In the case of Kountz v. S. Brown et al., 16 B. Mon. [Ky.] 585, suit was brought against the owners of a steamboat for damage done to a wharf boat.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Melson

40 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1913

See Albert Steinfield & Co. v. Wing Wong, 128 Pac. 354 ; Aris. E. R. Co. v. Globe Hardware Co., 129 Pac. 1104 ; Erickson v. State, 127 Pac. 754 . … Co. et al. v. Cluck, 97 Tex. 372 , 77 S. W. 403 , 64 L. R. A. 494, 104 Am. St. Rep. 863 , 1 Ann.

Adams v. Adams

30 Okla. 327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1911

Reavis v. Reavis, 1 Scam. (Ill.) 242; Deenis v. Deenis, 79 Ill. 74 ; Spitler v. Spitler, 108 Ill. 120 ; Edwards v. Edwards, 84 *332 Ala. 361, 3 South. 896 ; McDonald v. McDonald, 117 Iowa, 307 , 90 N. … In Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 324 , cited and approved in Ecker v.

Calkins v. Ponca City

89 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1923

Kansas v. McAleer, 31 Mo. App. 433 . … Pine City v. Munch (Minn.) 6 L. R. A. 763.

High Hill Rural Development Club Ex Rel. Davis v. Great American Insurance Co.

428 P.2d 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1967

In Merritt Independent School District No. 2 v. Jones, 207 Okl. 376 , 249 P.2d 1007 , we held that land owned by a school district -is held as a public trust and may be disposed of only in a manner provided by law. … If the school boards of the annexing districts by affirmative action could not have encumbered or disposed of this building, except as provided by law, the school boards •could not dispose of the building by inaction.

Wilhite v. Mansfield

23 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1909

In the case of Winslow v. … See Nance v. Southern Ry. Co. (N. C.) 63 S. E. 116 .

Brunson v. Com'rs of Land Office

145 Okla. 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1930

The Supreme Court of the United States was considering a similar question in Ward v. Board of County Commissioners of Love County, 253 U. S. 17 , 64 L. … State ex rel. v. Cruce et al., 31 Okla. 486 , 122 Pac. 237 .

Boy Scouts of America, Inc. v. Thompson

380 P.2d 705 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1963

In Wilson v. … And in Pitney v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 136 N.J.L. 157 , 55 A.2d 6 , the court after reciting prior adjudication of tax valuation and citing Tait v. Western Maryland R.

Perdue v. Sapp

205 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1951

Perdue, from a judgment of the district court of Kingfisher county, affirming a ruling of the Kingfisher county election board in an election contest over the office of county sheriff of said county. *41 It appears from the … In Muskrat v.

Owens v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

283 P.2d 827 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1954

Three different Boards of Commissioners were appointed and filed their reports. … Supply Co. v.

First National Bank of Washington v. Haines

76 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1919

Smith et al. v. La Fayette & Bro., 29 Okla. 671 , 119 Pac. 979 ; First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. Rogers, 24 Okla. 357 , 103 Pac. 582 ; Hoblitt et al. v. … In Ferguson v. Twisdale et al. (N. C.) 49 S.

Bank of Indian Territory v. Eckles

19 Okla. 159 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

In Scott v. Tyler; 14 Barb. (N. Y.) 202, “incur” is held to mean “to become liable for.” In Flanagan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. (Iowa) 50 N. W. 60 : “To become liable for.” In Beckman v. Van Dolsen, 24 N. Y. … In Deyo v. Stewart, 4 Denio (N. Y.) 101: “Brought on himself.” In Ashe v. Young, 68 Tex. 123 , 3 S. W. 454 : “Brought on, occasioned, or *164 caused.”

In Re Kimble

193 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1943

It is disclosed that a copy of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of the Board of Bar Governors was mailed to respondent May 13, 1938, and a transcript of all proceedings before the Board of Governors … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., dissent.

School District No. 9 v. Dickson Consolidated School Dist. No. 77

181 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1937

Ramsey v. County Commissioners of Payne County (1931) 149 Okla. 289 , 300 P. 389 ; see, also, to the same effect Valley Center School District No. 20 v. Hansberger (1925, Ariz.) 237 P. 957 ; State v. … J., BATLESS, V. O. J., and PHELPS and CORN. J.T.. concur.