Case law

Globe Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

67 O.B.A.J. 1043 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1996

Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., Okl., 833 P.2d 1218, 1225-26 (1992); Silver v. Slusher, Okl., 770 P.2d 878, 884 (1989); Ricks Exploration v. Okl. … Brown, The Law of Personal Property pp. 11-12 (W. Raushenbush 3d ed. 1975). See also Perkins v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Okl., 428 P.2d 328, 330 (1967).

Estes v. Timmons

12 Okla. 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1903

(Johnson v. Townsley, 80 U. S. 72 .) In Plummer v. Brown, 12 Pac. 464 , the supreme court of California in a case very similar to the one at bar, speaking of the decision of the officials of the land department, •say: . … Of like import will be found the decisions of Johnson v. Towsley, 13 Wall. 72; Shepley v. Cowan, 91 U. S. 330 ; Marquez v. Frisbie, 101 U. S. 473 ; Quinby v. Conlan, 104 U. S. 420 ; Lee v. Johnson, 116 U. S. 48 .

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Melson

40 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1913

See Albert Steinfield & Co. v. Wing Wong, 128 Pac. 354 ; Aris. E. R. Co. v. Globe Hardware Co., 129 Pac. 1104 ; Erickson v. State, 127 Pac. 754 . … Co. et al. v. Cluck, 97 Tex. 372 , 77 S. W. 403 , 64 L. R. A. 494, 104 Am. St. Rep. 863 , 1 Ann.

Elk City v. Johnson

537 P.2d 1215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1975

In Settle v. Board of Co. … Our holding in Settle v. Board of Co. Com’rs of Muskogee, Okl., 462 P.2d 646 , to the contrary, is hereby overruled.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Marathon Oil Co.

172 Okla. 371 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1935

The record discloses that no claim was filed with the board of county commissioners until January 14, 1933. … L. 1925, this court, in Western Paint & Chemical Co. v.

Harbaugh v. Walker

178 Okla. 280 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1936

Crawford v. Board of Com’rs, 8 Okla. 450 , 58 P. 616 . In that case this court cites from the case of Wall v. Monroe Co., 103 U. S. 77 , in which Mr. … See Mays v. Board of County Com’rs of Creek County, 164 Okla. 231 , 23 P. (2d) 664 ; also, Kavanaugh v.

In Re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.

43 Okla. 307 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1914

The State Board of Equalization found the value of its property for purposes of taxation to be $538,350. … Const., makes it the duty of the State Board of Equalization to ‘assess all railroad and public service corporation property.’

Colton v. Huntleigh USA Corp.

76 O.B.A.J. 1403 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 2005

Co. v. Vance, 1934 OK 412 , 35 P.2d 896 (Court Syllabus); Fifth Ave. Library Society v. Phillips, 1913 OK 687 , 136 P. 1076 (same). See Board of County Commissioners of Marshall County v. … Co. v. Brown, 1974 OK 19 , 519 P.2d 491, 495 .

Farmers Gin Co. v. Cooper

147 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1930

The Illinois court in Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Indus. Board, 279 Ill. 11 , 116 N. … E. 684 , said: “While the Industrial Board’s findings of fact are conclusive on this court, the legal conclusions of that board, based upon ¡.heir findings, are subject to the supervision of this court.

Thomas v. James

69 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1918

In Clark v. Barney 24 Okla. 455 , 103 Pac. 598 , Mr. … Chief Justice Sharp of this court in Chancey v.

Williams v. City of Norman

85 Okla. 230 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1921

It is held in Valley City Salt Co. v. Brown, 7 W. Va. 101 , that the expression ‘public utility’ is synonymous with ‘public use.’ * “In Aldridge v. Tuscumbia, C. & D. R. R. Co., 2 Stew. & P. (Ala.) 199, 23 Am. … To the same effect is North v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 115 ; Faulk v. Board of Co. Comm’rs, 40 Okla. 705 , 140 Pac. 777 ; Eakin et al. v. Chapman, Co. Treas., 44 Okla. 51 , 143 Pac. 21 . In Tilley V.

Pelican Production Corp. v. Mize

573 P.2d 703 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1977

The Board denied the variance and Pelican appealed to the District Court where, after trial de novo, judgment was entered affirming the order of the Board denying the variance. Pelican then appealed to this Court. … In Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v.

Wyatt-Doyle & Butler Engineers, Inc. v. City of Eufaula

71 O.B.A.J. 2580 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 2000

Del City v. FOP, Lodge No. 114, 1993 OK 169, ¶ 5 , 869 P.2d 309 . … Wyatt-Doyle cites City of Tulsa v. Langley, 1946 OK 123, ¶ 52 , 168 P.2d 116, 123 , and Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v.

Gardner v. Jones

309 P.2d 731 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1956

In Patterson v. Hughes and Bramble v. … Under this Court’s decision in Rucker v. Burke, 170 Okl. 243 , 39 P.2d 6 , and Gilbert v.

Dabney v. Hooker

121 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1926

The State Election Board, upon a canvass of the returns, issued its certificate of nomination to Dabney. … Jarman v. Mason, 102 Okla. 278 , 229 Pac. 459 ; Landsdon v. State Board (Idaho) 111 Pac. 133 ; State ex rel. Hatfield v. Carrington (Iowa) 190 N. W. 390 ; Bradley v. Board (Mich.) 117 N. W. 649 ; State v. Woodruff (N.

Carter v. State Ex Rel. Taylor

77 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1919

Respondent also cites Kearney v. Board of State Tax Commissioners (Mich.) 155 N. … Bashford v.

Scott v. Abraham

60 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1916

Continental Gin Co. v. De Bord, 34 Okla. 66 , 123 Pac. 159 ; Brown et al. v. Trent. 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 ; Sockey v. Winstock, 43 Okla. 758 , 144 Pac. 372 ; Elrod v. Adair, 54 Okla. 207 , 153 Pac. 666 . … v.

Thomas v. Wagoner

197 Okla. 662 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1946

In said primary, both of said candidates received the same number of votes, and the county election board then proceeded to select Wagoner as the winner, by lot. … Title 11, § 23b; Constitution of Oklahoma, art. 23, § 10; Allison v. Massey, 108 Okla. 140 , 235 P. 192 ; Whaley v. Cotton, 114 Okla. 274 , 246 P. 629 . The judgment of the trial court is therefore reversed.

Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Transit Lines, Inc. v. Baker

393 P.2d 868 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1964

In Redman et al. v. … J., HALLEY, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, JACKSON and IRWIN, JJ., concur

In Re Williams

172 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

Respondent further contends that: “The findings and recommendations of the *610 Board of Governors is wholly unjustified and not sustained- by. competent evidence.” .. … J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. WELCH, J., absent.