Case law

REVOLUTION RESOURCES v. ANNECY

477 P.3d 1133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 2020

OSCN Found Document:REVOLUTION RESOURCES v. ANNECY REVOLUTION RESOURCES v. … Johnson v. Ward, 1975 OK 129 , ¶42, 541 P.2d 182 . See also O'Laughlin v.

State ex rel. Department of Corrections v. Johnson

682 P.2d 750 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1984

The Board filed a Motion for Rehearing, Reopening or Reconsideration before the State Personnel Board, alleging that the Oklahoma State Personnel Board is an agency as defined in the Oklahoma Administrative Procedures Act … In Roussel v. State ex rel.

Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.

28 Okla. 706 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

In Gowen v. … McCarthy v. Shoneman, 198 Pa. 568 ; Fuller v. Ann Arbor R. Co. (Mich.) 104 N. W. 414 ; Stamford Oil & Mill Co. v. W. T.

Coyle v. United States Gypsum Co.

64 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1917

Hutchinson v. Krueger, 34 Okla. 23 , 124 Pac. 591 , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 315, Ann. Cas. 19140, 98; Western Terra Cotta Co. et al. v. Board of Education of the City of Shawnee, 39 Okla. 716 , 136 Pac. 595 School Dist. … State Board of Public Affairs, except as the proposal and said plans and specifications shall be modified to conform to the recommendations made to the State Board of Public Affairs by the board of regents of said school.

Williams v. City of Norman

85 Okla. 230 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1921

It is held in Valley City Salt Co. v. Brown, 7 W. Va. 101 , that the expression ‘public utility’ is synonymous with ‘public use.’ * “In Aldridge v. Tuscumbia, C. & D. R. R. Co., 2 Stew. & P. (Ala.) 199, 23 Am. … To the same effect is North v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 115 ; Faulk v. Board of Co. Comm’rs, 40 Okla. 705 , 140 Pac. 777 ; Eakin et al. v. Chapman, Co. Treas., 44 Okla. 51 , 143 Pac. 21 . In Tilley V.

Globe Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

67 O.B.A.J. 1043 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1996

Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., Okl., 833 P.2d 1218, 1225-26 (1992); Silver v. Slusher, Okl., 770 P.2d 878, 884 (1989); Ricks Exploration v. Okl. … Brown, The Law of Personal Property pp. 11-12 (W. Raushenbush 3d ed. 1975). See also Perkins v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Okl., 428 P.2d 328, 330 (1967).

Myers v. Luttrell

373 P.2d 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1961

Brown, Brown & Brown, McAlester, for defendant in error. *23 PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by C.G. Myers (defendant below) from a judgment on jury verdict in favor of S.B. … In Munroe v.

Estes v. Timmons

12 Okla. 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1903

(Johnson v. Townsley, 80 U. S. 72 .) In Plummer v. Brown, 12 Pac. 464 , the supreme court of California in a case very similar to the one at bar, speaking of the decision of the officials of the land department, •say: . … Of like import will be found the decisions of Johnson v. Towsley, 13 Wall. 72; Shepley v. Cowan, 91 U. S. 330 ; Marquez v. Frisbie, 101 U. S. 473 ; Quinby v. Conlan, 104 U. S. 420 ; Lee v. Johnson, 116 U. S. 48 .

Farmers Gin Co. v. Cooper

147 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1930

The Illinois court in Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Indus. Board, 279 Ill. 11 , 116 N. … E. 684 , said: “While the Industrial Board’s findings of fact are conclusive on this court, the legal conclusions of that board, based upon ¡.heir findings, are subject to the supervision of this court.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Melson

40 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1913

See Albert Steinfield & Co. v. Wing Wong, 128 Pac. 354 ; Aris. E. R. Co. v. Globe Hardware Co., 129 Pac. 1104 ; Erickson v. State, 127 Pac. 754 . … Co. et al. v. Cluck, 97 Tex. 372 , 77 S. W. 403 , 64 L. R. A. 494, 104 Am. St. Rep. 863 , 1 Ann.

Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. Dixon

51 Okla. 722 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

Co. v. Savage, 32 Okla. 376 , 122 Pac. 656 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Brown, 32 Okla. 483 , 122 Pac. 136 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Higgs, 42 Okla. 171 , 141 Pac. 10 . … Co. v. Higgs, supra; M., K. & T. Ry.. Co. v. Savage, supra; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Brown, supra; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Smith, 41 Okla. 314 , 137 Pac. 357 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v.

Elk City v. Johnson

537 P.2d 1215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1975

In Settle v. Board of Co. … Our holding in Settle v. Board of Co. Com’rs of Muskogee, Okl., 462 P.2d 646 , to the contrary, is hereby overruled.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Marathon Oil Co.

172 Okla. 371 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1935

The record discloses that no claim was filed with the board of county commissioners until January 14, 1933. … L. 1925, this court, in Western Paint & Chemical Co. v.

Harbaugh v. Walker

178 Okla. 280 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1936

Crawford v. Board of Com’rs, 8 Okla. 450 , 58 P. 616 . In that case this court cites from the case of Wall v. Monroe Co., 103 U. S. 77 , in which Mr. … See Mays v. Board of County Com’rs of Creek County, 164 Okla. 231 , 23 P. (2d) 664 ; also, Kavanaugh v.

Reed v. City of Tulsa

397 P.2d 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1964

See Bates v. State Industrial Court, Okl., 394 P.2d 529 ; Bray v. State Industrial Court, Okl., 393 P.2d 232 ; Brookshire v. Knippers Plumbing Co., Okl., 390 P.2d 887 and related cases. … J., HALLEY, V. C. J. and DAVISON, WILLIAMS, JACKSON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur.

Colton v. Huntleigh USA Corp.

76 O.B.A.J. 1403 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 2005

Co. v. Vance, 1934 OK 412 , 35 P.2d 896 (Court Syllabus); Fifth Ave. Library Society v. Phillips, 1913 OK 687 , 136 P. 1076 (same). See Board of County Commissioners of Marshall County v. … Co. v. Brown, 1974 OK 19 , 519 P.2d 491, 495 .

Haynie v. Bryant & Parker

117 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1926

Whittingill v. Board of County Commissioners, 66 Okla. 75 , 174 Pac. 491 ; Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 Pac. 565 ; Anderson v. … Board of County Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 165 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Baker v. Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 48 Okla. 737 , 150 Pac. 714 .

Thomas v. James

69 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1918

In Clark v. Barney 24 Okla. 455 , 103 Pac. 598 , Mr. … Chief Justice Sharp of this court in Chancey v.

Bay v. Oklahoma Southern Gas, Oil & Mining Co.

13 Okla. 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

(Sproat v. Durland 2 *435 Okla. 24; Woodruff v. Wallace, 3 Okla. 355 ; Reaves v. Oliver, 3 Okla. 62 ; Littlefield v. Todd, 3 Okla. 1 ; Glover v. Swartz, 8 Okla, 642; Barnes v. Newton, 5 Okla. 428 .) … It furthermore appears from Patterson’s affidavit that the location was made by Thomas Brown and seven others on the 8th day of August, but there is no evidence that Brown and his associates ever assigned or in any manner

Wilson v. Greer

50 Okla. 387 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1915

In re Brown’s Estate, 22 Okla. 216 , 97 Pac. 613 , is cited as in point. We do not think so. … See Collins Investment Co. v. Beard, 46 Okla. 310 , 148 Pac. 846 , decided May 11, 1915. In Proctor v.