Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.37s

  • Frost v. Davis

    182 Okla. 593 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1938

    The Wilson Case was cited and followed in Barber v. Brown, 55 Okla. 34 , 154 P. 1156 . In McCormick v. Hall, 337 Ill. 232 , 168 N. … See, also, Alexander v. Samuels, 177 Okla. 323 , 58 P.2d 878 . and Wells v. Brown (8 C. C. A.) 256 Fed. 852 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Cimarron Tp.

    68 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1917

    The bond is filed as an exhibit to the petition, and reads: “The Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Canadian County Board of County Commissioners, Geo. D. … (Mass.) 302; Caskie v. Harrison, 76 Va. 85 . Blankenship et al. v. Ely, 98 Va. 359 , 36 S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sartin v. Moran-Buckner Co.

    189 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1939

    As pointed out in United States Casualty Company v. Steiger, 179 Okla. 407 , 66 P. 2d 55 ; Van Orman v. Robinson, 150 Okla. 156 , 300 P. 412 ; Rialto Lead & Zinc Co. v. … three months after court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, since board was not ‘court’ within meaning of Constitution.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Bob Cason Motor Co.

    191 Okla. 332 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1942

    Liberty National Bank, 180 Okla. 44 , 67 P. 2d 790 ; Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559 , 67 P. 2d 448 ; Smith v. Aronoff, 179 Okla. 560 , 67 P. 2d 447 . The appeal is dismissed. … J., and CORN, V. C. J., absent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Drainage District No. 12 v. State Industrial Commission

    206 Okla. 460 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1952

    No. 12; Tulsa county, and board of county commissioners of Tulsa county, to review an award of the State Industrial Commission awarding compensation to Lee Roy J. … In Payton v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Coffe & Carkener v. Wilhite

    56 Okla. 394 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1916

    In Flagg v. Baldwin, 38 N. J. Eq. 219, 48 Am. … Mumford v. Canty, supra [ 50 Ill. 370 , 99 Am. Dec. 525 ] ; Story, Confl. sec. 327; Faulkner v. Hyman, 142 Mass. 53 ( 6 N. E. 846 ) ; Hill v. Spear, 50 N. H. 253, 9 Am. Rep. 205 ; Fisher v. Lord, 63 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re the Assessment of Real Property within Carter County

    363 P.2d 254 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1961

    In this appeal, plaintiff in error, or appellant, seeks reversal of the same State Board of Equalization’s order, appealed from in Board of County Com’rs of Kay County, Okl. v. … State Board of Equalization, Okl., 363 P.2d 257 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Oklahoma Press Pub. Co.'s Taxes

    200 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1948

    Hearing was had before the board of equalization on May 2, 1946, resulting in an order as shown by the minutes of the board, as follows: “Motion by J. T. … In Grubb v. Johnson Oil Refg.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Blue Grass Oil Co. v. Central Torpedo Co.

    82 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1921

    Alva Roller Mills v. Simmons, 74 Oklahoma, 185 Pac. 76 ; Hutchings v. Cobble, 30 Okla. 158 , 120 Pac. 1013 ; Murphy v. Hood, 12 Okla. 593 , 73 Pac. 261 . Section 5044, Rev. … Assn. v. Cummins, 78 Okla. 265 , 188 Pac. 1069 ; Hines v. Olsen, 78 Okla. 259 , 185 Pac. 436 ; Stone v. Stone, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 423 . For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • School District. No. 62 v. School District No. 17

    143 Okla. 136 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1930

    In the early case of Board of Education of El Reno v. … In support of tbe proposition plaintiff in error cites tbe case of Butler v. Board of County Com’rs, 57 Okla. 748 , 157 Pac. 912 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Richards v. Rose

    119 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1925

    In Coyle v. … Board of Com'rs of Kay County, 38 Okla. 370 , 132 P. 1113 , it was held that the board of county commissioners had no authority, subsequent to the filing of the petition and appointment of viewers by the district judge, to

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare Commission

    185 Okla. 177 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1939

    Williams v. State Board of Dental Examiners (Tenn.) 27 S. W. 1019 , and Bullick v. Billheimer (Ind.) 94 N. E. 763 . … Ann., secs. 26, 29), which body is also an administrative board. See Union Indemnity Co. v. Saling et al., 166 Okla. 133 , 26 P.2d 217 .

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • City of Tulsa v. Suttle

    182 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1937

    V. Suttle sued' the city of Tulsa. Okla., to recover salary as police detective officer, alleged to be due from May 7, 1934, to the date of filing the petition. An amended petition was later filed. … In City of Shawnee v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis & Young

    26 Okla. 359 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1910

    In Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brown, 14 Kan. 469 (2d Ed. 359), Mr. … The case of Railroad Co. v. Brown, 14 Kan. 469 , is in its facts very much in point.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Love v. Boyle

    72 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1919

    Squires, 14 Cal. 13 ; Fortune v. Buncombe Co., 140 N.C. 322 , 52 S.E. 950 ; State v. Anson, 132 Wis. 461 , 112 N.W. 475 . … Breene v. Howard, 67 Okla. 289 , 171 P. 30 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of Tulsa v. Langley

    196 Okla. 680 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1946

    Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Summers, 181 Okla. 312 , 73 P. 2d 409 ; O’Neil Engineering Co. v. Town of Ryan, 32 Okla. 738 , 124 P. 19 ; Herd Equipment Co. v. … Town of Eagle, 180 Okla. 172 , 68 P. 2d 420 ; Board of Education of Town of Terral v. Challey, 153 Okla. 273 , 5 P. 2d 747 ; Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okla. 164 , 292 P. 15 ; Town of Red Fork v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Colton

    4 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1896

    (Weston v. Johnson, 48 Indiana, 1; The Grover and Baker Sewing Machine Co. v. Barnes, 49 Indiana, 136; Northcutt et ux. v. Buckles et al. 60 Indiana 577.) … (Mulhall v. Mulhall, 3 Oklahoma, 252, 41 Pacific 577 ; Applegate v. Moffitt, 60 Indiana 104; Isler v. Bland, 117 Indiana 457.)

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In Re Evans

    71 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1918

    Notice of appeal was served upon Dunnington as county treasurer, upon the board of county commissioners, and upon said Evans. … This conclusion is clearly supported by the case of Kramer, County Treasurer, *89 v. Gypsy Oil Company, which we now approve, and the case of Cleveland County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • School District No. 9 v. Dickson Consolidated School Dist. No. 77

    181 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1937

    Ramsey v. County Commissioners of Payne County (1931) 149 Okla. 289 , 300 P. 389 ; see, also, to the same effect Valley Center School District No. 20 v. Hansberger (1925, Ariz.) 237 P. 957 ; State v. … J., BATLESS, V. O. J., and PHELPS and CORN. J.T.. concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Perdue v. Sapp

    205 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1951

    Perdue, from a judgment of the district court of Kingfisher county, affirming a ruling of the Kingfisher county election board in an election contest over the office of county sheriff of said county. *41 It appears from the … In Muskrat v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.