Case law

In re the Transfers of Students from Caney Valley Independent School District No. 1-18 to School District No. 1-4

507 P.2d 543 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1973

In this connection, notice Duncan v. Askew, 207 Okl. 542 , 251 P.2d 515 . … See Turrell v. Continental Oil Company, Okl., 466 P.2d 643 , Kelley v. Bryan, Okl., 361 P.2d 1080 , and the cases cited therein.

Adamson v. Allende

170 Okla. 154 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1934

The general rule relating to such evidence is found in Western Union Telegraph v. … In the case of Folsom Morris Coal Mining Co. v.

Public Service Co. v. B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc.

68 O.B.A.J. 2213 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1997

McCrady v. Western Farmers Electric Cooperative, supra; Arthur v. Board of Com’rs of Choctaw County, 43 Okl. 174 , 141 P. 1 (Okl.1914); City of Tulsa v. Williams, 100 Okl. 116 , 227 P. 876 (Okl.1924); Sublett v. … Arthur v. Board of Com’rs., supra; Luccock v. City of Norman, supra.

State Ex Rel. Baldwin v. Ingram

164 Okla. 179 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1933

Harrison v. Harman, 115 Okla. 40 , 241 P. 476 ; McKane et al. v. Hogan, 55 Okla. 624 , 155 P. 560 ; Ledgerwood v. Neal, 60 Okla. 133 , 150 P. 292 ; Randol v. Harbour-Longmire Co., 127 Okla. 7 , 259 P. 548 . … No board of county commissioners, nor city council, nor board of trustees of any township, or town, nor district board of any school district in this state, shall make any contract with any of its members or in which any

Eureka Reserve Life Insurance v. Glazner

115 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1925

In Fullenwider v. Royal League, 180 Ill. 621 , 54 N. … In Steen v. Modern Woodman of America, 17 A. L. R. 406, citing Fullenwider v. Royal League, supra, the identical language was used. In Hobbs v. Association (Iowa) 47 N.

INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 35 OF CHEROKEE CO. v. Doty

448 P.2d 846 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1968

448 P.2d 846 (1968) INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 35 OF CHEROKEE COUNTY, Oklahoma, Petitioner, v. Laton L. DOTY, Assigned Judge of the District Court of Cherokee County, Oklahoma, and C.F. … One of Tulsa County, Oklahoma v. Clendenning, Okl., 431 P.2d 382 .

State v. Ross

76 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1919

West v. Cobb, 24 Okla. 662 , 104 Pac. 361 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 639; Montgomery v. State Election Board, 27 Okla. 324 , 111 Pac. 447 ; Smith v. Hall, 28 Okla. 435 , 114 Pac. 608 ; State ex rel. Freeling v. … Board of Education v. Best, 26 Okla. 366 , 109 Pac. 563 ; Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. St. Joseph Parochial School, 33 Okla. 755 , 127 Pac. 1087 ; Thurston v. Caldwell, 40 Okla. 206 , 137 Pac. 683 ; State ex rel. Friend v.

Dumas v. Conyer

448 P.2d 835 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1968

Secrest v. Williams (1939), 185 Okl. 449 , 94 P.2d 252 ; Midwest City v. Eckroat (1963), Okl., 387 P.2d 123 . … Murdock v. Loeffelholz (1966), Okl, 421 P.2d 236 .

Dean v. Wes Watkins Area Vocational-Technical School District, No. 25

782 P.2d 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1989

Contests of candidacy for members of the board of education shall be the same as for candidates for county office. … Contests of elections shall be allowed only in elections of members of the board of education and shall be the same as for county office.” . City of Tulsa v.

Fish v. Sims

42 Okla. 535 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1914

Rogers v. Brown, 15 Okla. 524 , 86 Pac. 443 ; Pugh v. Stigler, 21 Okla. 854 , 97 Pac. 566 ; Oklahoma Moline Plow Co. v. Smith, 41 Okla. 498 , 139 Pac. 285 ; Russell v. Glasser, 93 Mo. 353 , 6 S. W. 352 ; 31 Cyc. 678. … Hooks v. Kennard, 28 Okla. 457 , 114 Pac. 744 ; Barnett et al. v. Way et al., 29 Okla. 780 , 119 Pac. 418 ; Divine v. Harmon, 30 Okla. 820 , 121 Pac. 219 ; Bilby v. Brown, 34 Okla. 738 , 126 Pac. 1024 .

Joint School Dist. No. 105 v. First Nat. Bank of Kingfisher

125 Okla. 243 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1926

(The board of county commissioners of each county is authorized to select and designate one or more banks located in the county as county depositories. … State ex rel. v. McCloud, 64 Okla. 126 , 166 Pac. 1065 . No contention is made that the warrant was not properly deposited in the depository bank.

Limestone Rural Telephone Co. v. Best

56 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916

This court in Brewer v. … \And in Bohart v.

Hassell v. Morgan

27 Okla. 453 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

Brown et al., 19 Okla. 77; Reeves & Co. v. Brennan, 25 Okla. 514 , 106 Pac. 959 ; Buckner v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank of Shawnee et al., 25 Okla. 472 , 106 Pac. 959 ; Ellis et al. v. … Outlet et al., 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957; Butler et al. v. McSpadden, 25 Okla. 465, 107 Pac. 170 ; Butler v.

Zachary v. City of Wagoner

146 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1930

In the case of City of Sapulpa v. … City of Spokane (Wash.) 41 Pac. 888 ; Faulkner v. City of Seattle (Wash.) 53 Pac. 365 ; Joliet v. Alexander (Ill.) 62 N. E. 861 ; East Moline v. Pope (Ill.) 79 N.

Kolp v. Parsons

50 Okla. 372 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1915

Laws 1910, section 5126; Brown v. Massey, 19 Okla. 482 , 92 Pac. 246 . … Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6, Caddo County, 24 Okla. 173 , 103 Pac. 639 ; Humphrey v. Hunt, 9 Okla. 196 , 59 Pac. 971 .

CIMARRON PIPELINE CONST. v. US Fid. & Guar. Ins. Co.

848 P.2d 1161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1993

Co. v. Erwin, 145 P. at 1127. In Hubbard v. … Oklahoma Board of Public Affairs, 613 P.2d 473 (Okla. 1980); Baker v. Massey, 569 P.2d 987 (Okla. 1977); Z.D. Howard Company v. Cartwright, 537 P.2d 345 (Okla. 1975).

Miner v. Turvey Packing Company

392 P.2d 720 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1964

In Hodges v. … ” In the body of that opinion the court quotes from City of Tulsa v.

State Ex Rel. Kaler v. School District No. 35

114 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1926

Earley v. Johnson, 58 Okla. 466 , 160 Pac. 482 ; Berwyn Mercantile Co. v. Ardmore Flour & Feed Co., 100 Okla. 245 , 229 Pac. 244 ; Gardner Petroleum Co. v. Hooper, 105 Okla. 297 , 232 Pac. 949 ; Oklahoma Union Ry. … Co. v. Houk, 109 Okla. 187 , 35 Pac. 499 .

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Nelson

31 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1911

Kuhnert v. Conde, 39 Kan. 265 , 18 Pac. 193 ; Bridge v. Main St. Hotel Co. et al., 61 Pac. 754 ; Doble v. Brown et al., 20 Ind. App. 12 , 50 N. E. 38 . … Skillern et al. v. Jameson et al., 29 Okla. 84 , 116 Pac. 193 . All the Justices concur.

Bledsoe v. Green

138 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1929

This language has been construed by this court in Brown v. State Nat. Bank of Shawnee, 133 Okla. 173 , 271 Pac. 833 , decided by this court on November 29, 1927, wherein Mr. … The rule announced in Brown v. State Nat. Bank of Shawnee, supra, as follows: “It is apparent that neither ‘appraisement waived’ nor words of similar import were used in the mortgage exhibited in the judgment roll.