Case law

Ex Parte Ellis

20 Okla. 507 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1908

This case is controlled by the decision in the case of Higgins v. … Brown (decided at this term of court and reported in this volume) 94 Pac. 703 , wherein it is held that an offense committed within the jurisdiction of the United States court of the Indian Territory, not of a federal character

Sutton v. Denton

55 Okla. 8 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1916

Opinion by BROWN, C. This was an action in ejectment, brought in the district court of Creek county by Harry R. Denton, the defendant in error, who will be hereinafter designated as the “plaintiff,” against F. M. … Nunn, 37 Okla. 389 , 132 Pac. 128 ; Phillips v. Byrd, 43 Okla. 556 , 143 Pac. 684 ; Sims v. Brown, 46 Okla. 767 , 149 Pac. 8776 ; Jackson v. Lair, 48 Okla. 269 , 150 Pac. 162 .

Umholtz v. City of Tulsa

565 P.2d 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1977

In Gray v. Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 312 P.2d 959 (1957), this Court stated: “A quasi-judicial duty is one lying in the judgment or discretion of an officer other than a judicial officer.” In Thompson v. … The court citing Board *23 of Regents v. Roth, supra, and Perry v.

Bowles v. City of Enid

206 Okla. 611 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1952

S. 1951 §§1001-1019, creates a “Board” known as the Planning and Resources Board. The Board is authorized to establish “ground water basins,” defining the area. … HALLEY, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, DAVISON, JOHNSON, and BINGAMAN, JJ., concur.

McIntosh v. Holtgrave

79 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1920

Such is the holding of this court in the cases of Brown v. Trent, 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 ; Elrod v. Adair, 54 Okla. 207 , 153 Pac. 660 ; Bridges v. Rea, 64 Oklahoma, 166 Pac. 416 ; Brewer v. … Commissioner Rosser, in the ease of Brown v.

Miller v. State Ex Rel. Standard Savings Ass'n

70 Okla. 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1918

Bank v. Gayle, County Treasurer, 55 Okla. 301 , 155 Pac. 552 , the principal announced is reaffirmed. But the defendant calls our attention to State ex rel. Oklahoma City Times Co. v. … In Trimmer v. State, supra, Mr. Justice Kane says in the body of the opinion: .

State Ex Rel. Howard v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

614 P.2d 45 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1980

Bancroft v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 202 Okl. 108 , 210 P.2d 666 (1949) cited in Kiddie v. Kiddie, 563 P.2d 139, 142 (Okl.1977), 85 A.L.R.3d 977, 980 . In the case of Steeley v. … Poulos v. State Board of Equalization, 552 P.2d 1134 (Okl.1975).

Nichols v. Department of Corrections

631 P.2d 746 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1981

The Oklahoma Board of Corrections may provide an insurance policy or bond to indemnify from personal civil liability each member of the Board of Corrections and any officer or employee of the Department whom the Board may … While this Court has recently held in Schrom v. Okl. Industrial Development, 536 *750 P.2d 904 (Okl.1975); State Board of Public Affairs v.

Tulsa Boiler & Mfg. Co. v. Shaffer

72 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1919

Bushnell v. … bond had been given, and if he dealt with Bradford without the required bond having been given, he did so at his peril, and must bear the burden of his loss” The above case is cited with approval in Reinhart & Donovan Co, v.

Pierce v. Otis Elevator Company

331 P.2d 481 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1958

They claimed that state courts accordingly were excluded not only from enjoining future unfair labor practices and thus colliding with the Board, as occurred in Garner v. … See also National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 1229, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 346 U.S. 464 , 74 S.Ct. 172 , 98 L.Ed. 195 .

First Nat. Bank of Leedy v. W. P. Seawell Lbr. Co.

135 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1928

In the case of Southwest National Bank v. … J., MASON, V. O. J., and HARRISON, PHELPS, HUNT, CLARK, and HEFNER, JJ., concur. Note.—See 7 C. J. p. 632, §307; p. 660, §358. See ‘Banks and Banking,” 7 C. J. §358, p. 661, n. 38.

Taylor v. Starr

109 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1924

In Young v. … Citing Bibb v. Allen, 149 U. S. 481 , 37 L. Ed. 819 , and Clews v. Jamieson, 182 U. S. 461 , 45 L. Ed. 1183 .” In Gettys v.

Baber v. Overton

80 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1921

settle the case-made, said case-made, having been signed and settled by the successor of the judge who tried the case, in the absence of a showing as to the inability of the trial judge so to do, is a nullity, following Brown … v.

Craig v. Wright

169 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

Brown v. Hawkes (1891) 2 Q. B. 718. … Brown v. Hawkes, supra; and compare sections 724 and 725, O. S. 1931; then see Newell, Id., p. 834; Bigelow, Id., pp. 284-5, and Spencer Bower on Actionable Defamation (2d Ed.) p. 22.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Busch

67 O.B.A.J. 2587 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1996

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957). … For other cases involving application to the boards of bar examiners see Clark v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, 880 F.Supp. 430 (E.D.Va.1995); Johnson v. State of Kansas, 888 F.Supp. 1073 (D.Kan.1995); Campbell v.

Pierce v. Cartwright

638 P.2d 450 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1981

In Arthur v. … See Arthur v. City of Stillwater, 611 P.2d 637, at 643 (1980).

Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. Barnett

475 P.2d 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1970

In support of this contention respondent cites and relies on the statement shown in 24 Am.Jur.2d § 45, and Long v. Bagwell, 38 Okl. 312 , 133 P. 50 , and Brown v. Massey, 19 Okl. 482 , 92 P. 246 . … In the case of Brown v. Massey, supra, the defendant’s answer prayed judgment declaring a tax deed null and void and quieting title to the property in defendants. In the case of Long v.

Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Keirsey

266 P.2d 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1954

Co. v. Brown, 46 Okl. 735 , 148 P. 1040 ; Kurn v. Immel, 184 Okl. 571 , 89 P.2d 308 . Plaintiff’s petition shows on its face that the cow was killed not by operation of the- railroad but by eating Johnson grass. … Co. v. Brown, supra. Likewise there was no duty at common law to construct cattle guards to prevent the intrusion of cattle.

Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Hackett

136 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1929

Schwartz et al. v. State et al., 70 Okla. 205 , 174 Pac. 255 ; Nash v. Denton, 59 Kan. 771 , 51 Pac. 896 . Counsel for plaintiff admits that the motion should have been sustained under authority of Schwartz et al. v. … Hinton et al. v. State ex rel. Neal, 57 Okla. 777 , 156 Pac. 161 ; Joint School District et al. v. Eirst National Bank of Kingfisher et al., 125 Okla. 243 , 257 Pac. 318 .

Sheldon v. Grand River Dam Authority

182 Okla. 24 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1938

No. 71, supra; Board of Com’rs of Grady County v. Hammerly (1922) 85 Okla. 52 , 204 P. 445 ; Robinson v. Board of Com’rs (1931) 151 Okla. 100 , 1 P. (2d) 660 ; Madden v. … Excise Board of Harmon County (1932) 160 Okla. 170 , 16 P. (2d) 259 ; White v. Infield (1926) 122 Okla. 4 , 250 P. 81 , and others.